Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #18823 > unrolled thread

Newsreaders

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps

Contents

  Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-27 09:41 -0700
    Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 11:56 -0500
    Re: Newsreaders Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-10-27 13:01 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 12:36 -0500
        Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 14:41 -0500
          Re: Newsreaders snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 19:58 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 15:05 -0500
              Re: Newsreaders snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 20:42 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders dorayme <dorayme@optusnet.com.au> - 2013-10-28 10:23 +1100
    Re: Newsreaders Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2013-10-27 19:57 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 20:03 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 10:58 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders for Mac OS X Mavericks snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-10-27 22:11 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders for Mac OS X Mavericks Whiskers <catwheezel@operamail.com> - 2013-10-27 23:31 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders for Mac OS X Mavericks »Q« <boxcars@gmx.net> - 2013-10-27 19:46 -0500
              Re: Newsreaders for Mac OS X Mavericks Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-11-01 16:55 +0100
      Re: Newsreaders gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-10-27 19:16 -0700
        Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:21 -0500
      Re: Newsreaders Bob Harris <nospam.News.Bob@remove.Smith-Harris.us> - 2013-10-28 03:05 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-28 05:05 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 12:32 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-28 12:48 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 13:45 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-28 15:19 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:26 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-28 16:17 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 21:19 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 22:48 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 07:44 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 23:19 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 05:00 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 07:47 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 09:03 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-29 09:42 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 20:47 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 04:56 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 21:43 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-11-01 16:48 +0100
                      Re: Newsreaders Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2013-11-02 11:14 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-30 20:11 +0100
        Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-30 14:45 -0500
    Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 10:58 +1300
    Re: Newsreaders M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-10-27 19:24 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-27 23:42 +0000
        Re: Newsreaders M-M <nospam.m-m@ny.more> - 2013-10-27 20:09 -0400
          Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 19:16 -0500
          Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-28 00:16 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:11 -0500
            Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-28 13:54 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 09:01 -0500
                Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-28 08:51 -0700
                Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:09 +1300
                  Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 20:44 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-30 20:04 +0100
                    Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-31 18:49 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-30 20:02 +0100
                  Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-30 14:44 -0500
                  Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 08:52 +1300
                  Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-30 12:56 -0700
                  Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-30 20:18 +0000
                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 23:24 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-31 05:25 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-31 17:18 +0100
                          Re: Newsreaders Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-10-31 17:57 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-31 18:22 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders Jesse <jesse.rehmer@blueworldhosting.com> - 2013-10-31 14:48 -0500
                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-31 21:26 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-28 08:44 -0700
        Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 01:26 +0000
          Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 21:04 -0500
            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 02:11 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Lloyd  E Parsons <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-27 22:01 -0500
                Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 03:40 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-28 17:26 +1300
                    Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:17 -0500
                  Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:16 -0500
                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-28 13:39 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-28 08:43 -0500
    Re: Newsreaders Ted Lee <tmplee@mr.net> - 2013-10-27 20:30 -0500
      Re: Newsreaders AV3 <arvimide@earthlink.net> - 2013-10-28 11:02 -0400
    Re: Newsreaders Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-10-28 00:48 -0400
      Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-30 19:39 +0100
    Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-28 15:16 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 15:21 +0000
      Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-28 08:31 -0700
        Re: Newsreaders Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2013-10-28 08:57 -0700
          Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-29 05:25 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 09:22 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2013-10-28 21:22 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 13:29 +1300
              Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 01:43 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 05:04 +0000
                  Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 18:25 +1300
                    Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 01:33 -0400
                    Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 05:37 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-29 19:25 +1300
                        Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 07:25 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2013-10-29 04:07 -0400
                            Re: Newsreaders Martin Τrautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> - 2013-10-29 09:00 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 10:24 +1300
                                Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-30 19:33 +0100
                          Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 09:26 +1300
                        Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-30 19:32 +0100
                          Re: Newsreaders Michelle Steiner <michelle@michelle.org> - 2013-10-30 12:00 -0700
                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 19:43 +0000
                          Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-10-30 21:53 -0400
                    Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-29 21:35 +0000
                      Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-29 16:28 -0700
                        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 13:33 +1300
                          Re: Newsreaders bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> - 2013-10-29 23:14 -0700
                            Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 21:43 +1300
                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 12:39 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
                              Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-31 09:31 +1300
                            Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-31 08:52 +1300
                        Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 19:36 +1300
                          Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 12:42 +0000
                            Re: Newsreaders Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-10-30 19:23 +0100
                              Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-31 18:49 +0000
                        Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-30 14:39 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
              Re: Newsreaders Erilar <drache@chibardun.netinvalid> - 2013-10-29 17:01 +0000
                Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-30 09:29 +1300
          Re: Newsreaders "D.F. Manno" <dfmanno@mail.com> - 2013-10-30 16:44 -0400
            Re: Newsreaders Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> - 2013-10-30 23:22 +0000
            Re: Newsreaders Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2013-10-31 13:15 +1300
    Re: Newsreaders "J.P. Kuypers" <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> - 2013-10-29 10:10 +0100
      Re: Newsreaders Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> - 2013-10-29 08:36 -0500
        Re: Newsreaders jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2013-10-30 10:25 +1300
      Re: Newsreaders spamfalle2@arcor.de (Marc Stibane) - 2013-11-05 20:31 +0100

Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

#19053

Lewis wrote:

>
> Geeks, obviously, use version numbers.
>

Which RFC is that in?

:-)

-- 
Paul Sture

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19139

Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> wrote:
> Lewis wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Geeks, obviously, use version numbers.
>> 
> 
> Which RFC is that in?
> 
> :-)

I dom't recall being classified as a geek very often. . .

-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19031

bill van <billvan@delete.shaw.ca> wrote:
> In article <slrnl70agp.16qu.g.kreme@jaka.local>,
>  Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> 
>> In message <291020131825107266%YourName@YourISP.com> 
>>   Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>> In article <slrnl6ugfn.37j.t-usenet@ID-685.user.individual.de>, Martin
>>> rautmann <t-usenet@gmx.net> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 01:43:48 +0000 (UTC), Lewis wrote:
>>>>>  In message <291020131329139978%YourName@YourISP.com> 
>>>>>    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
>>>>>> easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
>>>>>> rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
>>>>>> silly codenames fit.
>>>>> 
>>>>>  The codenames are the names most people know. They are much easier for
>>>>>  people to keep track of than a number.
>>>> 
>>>> I can't. Maybe I'm more the numbers guy, remembering that I jumped from
>>>> 6.0.8 via 7.0.1 til 7.6.1 to 10.3, upgrading until 10.6.8 and now maybe
>>>> waiting for 10.9.1 to jump in again. 
>>>> 
>>>> Tell me, which one was Capone?
>> 
>>> Exactly. Most normal people use numbers to indicate a series, not
>>> random silly names.
>> 
>> First, if you ask regular people what OS version they have they are FAR
>> more likely to tell you the name than the number. If you press for the
>> number, chances are very good they have no idea. Second, this is even
>> true for some abnormal people.
> 
> I must be abnormally abnormal. Within a few months of installing each 
> big cat OS I've forgotten which cat it was. But 10.6.8, which I've been 
> running for a couple of years, is top of mind and tip of tongue for me; 
> I don't have to think about it.
> 
> My wife, whose iMac runs the same OS, remembered Snow Leopard and 10.6, 
> but not the .8 part. 
> 
> I have a feeling that it's a very individual thing and that we tend to 
> assume that the way we remember it ourselves is the normal way.
> 
I think you're right.  I've never been sure which cat name I'm actually
using.


-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18973

Lewis <g.kreme@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> In message <291020131329139978%YourName@YourISP.com> 
>   Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
>> They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
>> easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
>> rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
>> silly codenames fit.
> 
> The codenames are the names most people know. They are much easier for
> people to keep track of than a number.

I question "most".  I think it's just a marketing ploy.

-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18974

Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> In article <slrnl6tlnt.b0i.mr@irc.sandman.net>, Sandman
> <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>> In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck
>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is Mavericks a new OS?
>>>> 
>>>> Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
>>>> 
>>>>> Did they run out of cats?
>>>> 
>>>> Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
>>> 
>>>  I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)
>> 
>> And Lynx or Ocelot :)
> 
> One of the big(ish) rumours at the beginning of the year was that Mac
> OS X 10.9 would be called Lynx.  :-)
> 
> Apple simply ran out of big cat names. Coming down from Lion (or
> Mountain Lion) to Lynx might have been considered to be sending the
> wrong "message" about it being less powerful or some such marketing /
> pshco-babble nonsense.
> 
> They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
> easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
> rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
> silly codenames fit.

That would be much more logical.  It took me a while to figure out why
people were talking about stray cattle here.
-- 
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist with iPad

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18981

In article <l4opl8$ltb$5@dont-email.me>, Erilar
<drache@chibardun.netinvalid> wrote:

> Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
> > In article <slrnl6tlnt.b0i.mr@irc.sandman.net>, Sandman
> > <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> >> In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>, Savageduck
> >> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Is Mavericks a new OS?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Did they run out of cats?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
> >>> 
> >>>  I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)
> >> 
> >> And Lynx or Ocelot :)
> > 
> > One of the big(ish) rumours at the beginning of the year was that Mac
> > OS X 10.9 would be called Lynx.  :-)
> > 
> > Apple simply ran out of big cat names. Coming down from Lion (or
> > Mountain Lion) to Lynx might have been considered to be sending the
> > wrong "message" about it being less powerful or some such marketing /
> > pshco-babble nonsense.
> > 
> > They should just get rid of the silly names completely. It's much
> > easier to know that "Mac OS X 10.9" is newer than "Mac OS X 10.6",
> > rather than trying to figure out where in the timeline the different
> > silly codenames fit.
> 
> That would be much more logical.  It took me a while to figure out why
> people were talking about stray cattle here.

At least we can be thankful that Apple is (so far) fairly consistent.
Unlike Windows where they can't decide whether to use numbers (3.1, 8),
years (95, 2000), or names (XP, Vista).  :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19073

In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
 Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

> Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> said:
> > On 2013-10-28 15:16:28 +0000, Erilar said:
> > 
> >> Is Mavericks a new OS?
> > 
> > Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
> > 
> >> Did they run out of cats?
> > 
> > Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
> 
> I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)

Or "Cougar." Or "Ocelot."

-- 
D.F. Manno | dfmanno@mail.com
GOP delenda est!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19083

In message <dfmanno-89641F.16444530102013@news.albasani.net> 
  D.F. Manno <dfmanno@mail.com> wrote:
> In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:

>> Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> said:
>> > On 2013-10-28 15:16:28 +0000, Erilar said:
>> > 
>> >> Is Mavericks a new OS?
>> > 
>> > Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
>> > 
>> >> Did they run out of cats?
>> > 
>> > Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
>> 
>> I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)

> Or "Cougar."

0% chance they would ever use that one.

> Or "Ocelot."

Ocelot was always the name of the next unreleased version :)

-- 
In the 60's, people took acid to make the world appear weird. Now the
world is weird and people take Prozac to make it appear normal.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19092

In article <dfmanno-89641F.16444530102013@news.albasani.net>, D.F.
Manno <dfmanno@mail.com> wrote:

> In article <2013102808574249220-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom>,
>  Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> 
> > Michelle Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> said:
> > > On 2013-10-28 15:16:28 +0000, Erilar said:
> > > 
> > >> Is Mavericks a new OS?
> > > 
> > > Yes.  It's OS X 10.9
> > > 
> > >> Did they run out of cats?
> > > 
> > > Apparently so, according to what they said at the WWDC in June.
> > 
> > I guess they missed "Civet". ;-)
> 
> Or "Cougar." Or "Ocelot."

Technically a Cougar and a Mountain Lion are the same animal, so they
could use Cougar for a very minor update to Mountain Lion, but not
really for a full version number update.  :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18958

In article (Dans l'article) <l4jfnl$995$1@dont-email.me>, Michelle
Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> wrote (écrivait) :

> So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on Mavericks? 
>  Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?

MacSOUP ?

Some French speaking Useneters swear by it.

-- 
Jean-Pierre Kuypers

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18963

In article <291020131010406196%Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid>,
J.P. Kuypers <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> wrote:

> In article (Dans l'article) <l4jfnl$995$1@dont-email.me>, Michelle
> Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> wrote (écrivait) :
> 
> > So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on Mavericks? 
> >  Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?
> 
> MacSOUP ?
> 
> Some French speaking Useneters swear by it.

There's no accounting for taste is there?  :)

-- 
Lloyd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#18988

Lloyd <lloydp21@live.com> wrote:

> In article <291020131010406196%Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid>,
> J.P. Kuypers <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> wrote:
> 
> > In article (Dans l'article) <l4jfnl$995$1@dont-email.me>, Michelle
> > Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> wrote (écrivait) :
> > 
> > > So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on Mavericks?
> > >  Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?
> > 
> > MacSOUP ?
> > 
> > Some French speaking Useneters swear by it.
> 
> There's no accounting for taste is there?  :)

I shun you sir! :-p

Regards,
 Jamie Kahn Genet
-- 
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19261

J.P. Kuypers <Jean-Pierre.Kuypers@adresse.invalid> wrote:
> In article (Dans l'article) <l4jfnl$995$1@dont-email.me>, Michelle
> Steiner <email@michelle@michelle.org> wrote (écrivait) :

>> So what is the consensus for a newsreader to replace MTNW on
>> Mavericks? Thoth, Unison, Hogwasher, something else?
> MacSOUP ?
> Some French speaking Useneters swear by it.

Some german too...
Especially since Stefan changed the keyboard handling last month.
Finally! I begged him for months to do that. MacBook keyboards no longer
sport an enter key, which was very essential for fast reading. Now you
can also use the key above the right shift and left of the return key to
achieve that function.

Go grab the new version 2.8.4 here:
  <http://www.haller-berlin.de/macsoup/download.html>


-- 
In a world without walls and fences,
   who needs windows and gates?

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 7 of 7 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps

csiph-web