Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #19469 > unrolled thread

Guess what?

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps

Contents

  Guess what? Like-GlobalMarket <jinzichina@gmail.com> - 2013-11-20 23:29 -0800
    Re: Guess what? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-11-21 08:06 -0800
      Re: Guess what? Davoud <star@sky.net> - 2013-11-21 11:11 -0500
        Re: Guess what? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-11-21 08:50 -0800
          Re: Guess what? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-21 13:07 -0500
            Re: Guess what? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-11-21 12:06 -0800
              Re: Guess what? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-21 20:13 -0500
                Re: Guess what? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-11-21 23:08 -0800
                  Re: Guess what? Wes Groleau <Groleau+news@FreeShell.org> - 2013-11-23 00:53 -0500
                    Re: Guess what? gtr <xxx@yyy.zzz> - 2013-11-23 10:14 -0800
    What? Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> - 2013-11-23 05:47 -0800
      Re: What? Michael Vilain <vilain@NOspamcop.net> - 2013-11-23 11:45 -0800
        Re: What? Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-11-24 17:59 +0100
          Re: What? PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2013-11-24 18:58 -0500
          Re: What? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-11-25 16:50 -0500
          Re: What? John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> - 2013-11-26 08:23 -0800
            Re: What? isw <isw@witzend.com> - 2013-11-26 09:40 -0800
            Re: What? PhillipJones <pjonescet@comcast.net> - 2013-11-26 18:00 -0500
            Re: What? Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2013-11-26 21:01 +0100
        Re: What? Alan Browne <alan.browne@FreelunchVideotron.ca> - 2013-11-25 16:49 -0500

#19469 — Guess what?

Will water leak out from the cup?The answer is NO! How miraculous,aha?The product looks like tea set with holes, which is applied with pierced decoration. Want to have one? Click here:
http://like.globalmarket.com/signin.html?src=https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/comp.sys.mac.apps&time=2013.11.21 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#19471

On 2013-11-21 07:29:25 +0000, Like-GlobalMarket said:

> Will water leak out from the cup?The answer is NO! How 
> miraculous,aha?The product looks like tea set with holes, which is 
> applied with pierced decoration. Want to have one? Click here:
> http://like.globalmarket.com/signin.html?src=https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/comp.sys.mac.apps&time=2013.11.21 
> 

Clicking there produces an opportunity to signin to a website where I 
have no membership.  You're really new at this spam thing, aren't you?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19472

> You're really new at this spam thing, aren't you?

I would say that you are the one who seems new at the spam business. Do
you think that the spammer is hanging around this newsgroup with bated
breath, waiting for someone to respond? Are you lonely with no one to
talk to?

-- 
I agree with almost everything that you have said and almost everything that
you will say in your entire life.

usenet *at* davidillig dawt cawm

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19475

On 2013-11-21 16:11:50 +0000, Davoud said:

>> 
>> You're really new at this spam thing, aren't you?
> 
> I would say that you are the one who seems new at the spam business.

But I'm not in the spam business.  I'm in the commenting on nothing in 
particular business.

> Do you think that the spammer is hanging around this newsgroup with bated
> breath, waiting for someone to respond?

No, but on the very off chance that he is, I figured he should know his 
link is probably not doing what he intended it to.

> Are you lonely with no one to talk to?

No.  Are you angry about something?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19479

On 11-21-2013, 11:50, gtr wrote:
> No, but on the very off chance that he is, I figured he should know his
> link is probably not doing what he intended it to.

Why would you want to do him any favors?  If he doesn't reel in enough 
suckers, he'll stop spamming.

-- 
Wes Groleau

  Guidelines for judging others:
  1. Don't attribute to malice that which
     can be adequately explained by stupidity.
  2. Don't attribute to stupidity that which
     can be adequately explained by ignorance.
  3. Don't attribute to ignorance that which
     can be adequately explained by misunderstanding.
  4. Don't attribute to misunderstanding that which
     can be adequately explained by alcohol.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19481

On 2013-11-21 18:07:19 +0000, Wes Groleau said:

> On 11-21-2013, 11:50, gtr wrote:
>> No, but on the very off chance that he is, I figured he should know his
>> link is probably not doing what he intended it to.
> 
> Why would you want to do him any favors?  If he doesn't reel in enough 
> suckers, he'll stop spamming.

I'm just a helpful guy, I guess.

Wait a minute, you're saying that spammers can be stopped if there 
stupid enough? I'll have to think about the logic of that.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19490

On 11-21-2013, 15:06, gtr wrote:
> Wait a minute, you're saying that spammers can be stopped if there
> stupid enough? I'll have to think about the logic of that.

They do it because they send millions for free, and the hundred suckers 
that respond get him enough money to make him thinking he should do it 
again.  If he screws up his website AND nobody tells him, or any other 
situation keeps him from getting anything at all, then he'll decide it 
wasn't worth the time to type the spam.

-- 
Wes Groleau

  Guidelines for judging others:
  1. Don't attribute to malice that which
     can be adequately explained by stupidity.
  2. Don't attribute to stupidity that which
     can be adequately explained by ignorance.
  3. Don't attribute to ignorance that which
     can be adequately explained by misunderstanding.
  4. Don't attribute to misunderstanding that which
     can be adequately explained by alcohol.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19496

On 2013-11-22 01:13:54 +0000, Wes Groleau said:

> On 11-21-2013, 15:06, gtr wrote:
>> Wait a minute, you're saying that spammers can be stopped if there
>> stupid enough? I'll have to think about the logic of that.
> 
> They do it because they send millions for free, and the hundred suckers 
> that respond get him enough money to make him thinking he should do it 
> again.  If he screws up his website AND nobody tells him, or any other 
> situation keeps him from getting anything at all, then he'll decide it 
> wasn't worth the time to type the spam.

That's one view.  I am of the opinion that in the end spammer's NEVER 
get what they want and that's why they ALWAYS go away.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19530

On 11-22-2013, 02:08, gtr wrote:
> On 2013-11-22 01:13:54 +0000, Wes Groleau said:
>
>> On 11-21-2013, 15:06, gtr wrote:
>>> Wait a minute, you're saying that spammers can be stopped if there
>>> stupid enough? I'll have to think about the logic of that.
>>
>> They do it because they send millions for free, and the hundred
>> suckers that respond get him enough money to make him thinking he
>> should do it again.  If he screws up his website AND nobody tells him,
>> or any other situation keeps him from getting anything at all, then
>> he'll decide it wasn't worth the time to type the spam.
>
> That's one view.  I am of the opinion that in the end spammer's NEVER
> get what they want and that's why they ALWAYS go away.

How do you know they go away?  I haven't seen the spam slow down recently.

-- 
Wes Groleau

You always have time for what you do first.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19545

On 2013-11-23 05:53:45 +0000, Wes Groleau said:

> On 11-22-2013, 02:08, gtr wrote:
>> On 2013-11-22 01:13:54 +0000, Wes Groleau said:
>> 
>>> On 11-21-2013, 15:06, gtr wrote:
>>>> Wait a minute, you're saying that spammers can be stopped if there
>>>> stupid enough? I'll have to think about the logic of that.
>>> 
>>> They do it because they send millions for free, and the hundred
>>> suckers that respond get him enough money to make him thinking he
>>> should do it again.  If he screws up his website AND nobody tells him,
>>> or any other situation keeps him from getting anything at all, then
>>> he'll decide it wasn't worth the time to type the spam.
>> 
>> That's one view.  I am of the opinion that in the end spammer's NEVER
>> get what they want and that's why they ALWAYS go away.
> 
> How do you know they go away?  I haven't seen the spam slow down recently.

My mileage varies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19537 — What?

Chicken butt? :P
-- 
"The eyeless ant asked God, 'Give me eye-lashes.'" --Georgian Proverb
    /\___/\         Ant(Dude) @ http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
   / /\ /\ \                Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
  | |o   o| |
     \ _ /        If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
      ( )         If e-mailing, then axe ANT from its address if needed.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19548 — Re: What?

In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
 Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:

> Chicken butt? :P

Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".  
It was her favorite part of the chicken.

-- 
DeeDee, don't press that button!  DeeDee!  NO!  Dee...
[I filter all Goggle Groups posts, so any reply may be automatically ignored]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19569 — Re: What?

Michael Vilain wrote:

> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>  Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>
>> Chicken butt? :P
>
> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".  
> It was her favorite part of the chicken.

My parents called it the "Parson's nose" and it was always regarded as
inedible, so went in the dog.

-- 
Paul Sture

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19585 — Re: What?

Paul Sture wrote:
> Michael Vilain wrote:
>
>> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>>   Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>>
>>> Chicken butt? :P
>>
>> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".
>> It was her favorite part of the chicken.
>
> My parents called it the "Parson's nose" and it was always regarded as
> inedible, so went in the dog.
>
We always called the part that went over the fence last.
  Its basically skin and Fat.

-- 
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.      "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net    mailto:pjonescet@comcast.net

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19596 — Re: What?

On 2013.11.24, 11:59 , Paul Sture wrote:
> Michael Vilain wrote:
>
>> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>>   Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>>
>>> Chicken butt? :P
>>
>> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".
>> It was her favorite part of the chicken.
>
> My parents called it the "Parson's nose" and it was always regarded as
> inedible, so went in the dog.

Lucky dog.  It's really the 'tail' of the bird.  Skin around fat and 
bone.  Very edible.


-- 
"The radio was once expected to promote international understanding and 
co-operation;
it has turned out to be a means of insulating one nation from another."
                                                  -George Orwell, 1945

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19615 — Re: What?

On 11/24/13   PDT, 8:59 AM, Paul Sture wrote:
> Michael Vilain wrote:
>
>> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>>   Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>>
>>> Chicken butt? :P
>>
>> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".
>> It was her favorite part of the chicken.
>
> My parents called it the "Parson's nose" and it was always regarded as
> inedible, so went in the dog.

Small dog?
Reason I ask is I grew up being told that our dogs would choke on 
chicken bones. (or could).

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19616 — Re: What?

In article <l72huj$hjt$6@dont-email.me>,
 John McWilliams <jpmcw@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 11/24/13   PDT, 8:59 AM, Paul Sture wrote:
> > Michael Vilain wrote:
> >
> >> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
> >>   Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Chicken butt? :P
> >>
> >> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".
> >> It was her favorite part of the chicken.
> >
> > My parents called it the "Parson's nose" and it was always regarded as
> > inedible, so went in the dog.
> 
> Small dog?
> Reason I ask is I grew up being told that our dogs would choke on 
> chicken bones. (or could).

Whether you call it "Parson's Nose" or "Last Part of the Bird Over the 
Fence", it doesn't have any bones.

I toss it in the pot with the neck and other trimmings to make stock for 
the gravy.

Isaac

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19623 — Re: What?

John McWilliams wrote:
> On 11/24/13   PDT, 8:59 AM, Paul Sture wrote:
>> Michael Vilain wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>>>   Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chicken butt? :P
>>>
>>> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".
>>> It was her favorite part of the chicken.
>>
>> My parents called it the "Parson's nose" and it was always regarded as
>> inedible, so went in the dog.
>
> Small dog?
> Reason I ask is I grew up being told that our dogs would choke on
> chicken bones. (or could).
>
If there is any bone it very small. Its mostly skin and Fat the Tail 
feathers grow here.

-- 
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T.      "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net    mailto:pjonescet@comcast.net

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19626 — Re: What?

John McWilliams wrote:

> On 11/24/13   PDT, 8:59 AM, Paul Sture wrote:
>> Michael Vilain wrote:
>>
>>> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>>>   Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Chicken butt? :P
>>>
>>> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".
>>> It was her favorite part of the chicken.
>>
>> My parents called it the "Parson's nose" and it was always regarded as
>> inedible, so went in the dog.
>
> Small dog?
> Reason I ask is I grew up being told that our dogs would choke on 
> chicken bones. (or could).

Gristle rather than bone I think.  We too avoided giving chicken bones
to dogs.  We were told that chicken bones are prone to splintering and
that's where they are dangerous for dogs.

It's advice I followed when I had a dog myself.

-- 
Paul Sture

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#19595 — Re: What?

On 2013.11.23, 14:45 , Michael Vilain wrote:
> In article <xdGdnUOVSdZLLA3PnZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
>   Ant <ant@zimage.comANT> wrote:
>
>> Chicken butt? :P
>
> Nana always called it the "Pope's nose".
> It was her favorite part of the chicken.

Yep - I have dibs on it.


-- 
"The radio was once expected to promote international understanding and 
co-operation;
it has turned out to be a means of insulating one nation from another."
                                                  -George Orwell, 1945

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps

csiph-web