Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #8896 > unrolled thread

Microsoft Word 1.0

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.apps

Contents

  Microsoft Word 1.0 Mulder <nil.bureau.bitbucket@gmail.com> - 2012-04-04 07:47 -0700
    Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Guenther Fischer <never@spam.invalid> - 2012-04-05 13:13 +0200
      Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 sbt <dogbreath@chaseabone.com.invalid> - 2012-04-05 13:06 -0700
        Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-04-05 16:26 -0400
          Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2012-04-05 15:12 -0700
            Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Erik Richard Sørensen <tulle@tulle.dk> - 2012-04-06 00:25 +0200
              Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2012-04-05 22:35 +0000
                Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Erik Richard Sørensen <tulle@tulle.dk> - 2012-04-06 01:12 +0200
              Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Paul Magnussen <magiconinc@earthlink.net> - 2012-04-06 11:40 -0700
                Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Phillip Jones <pjones1@kimbanet.com> - 2012-04-06 22:09 -0400
                  Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-04-06 23:12 -0400
                    Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2012-04-07 04:36 +0000
                    Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Erik Richard Sørensen <tulle@tulle.dk> - 2012-04-07 13:18 +0200
                      Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-04-07 12:25 +0100
                      Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2012-04-07 17:14 +0000
                        Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Erik Richard Sørensen <tulle@tulle.dk> - 2012-04-07 19:41 +0200
                  Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-07 16:25 +1200
                    Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 PhillipJones <pjones1@kimbanet.com> - 2012-04-07 10:26 -0400
                      Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-04-07 17:39 +0100
                        Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 PhillipJones <pjones1@kimbanet.com> - 2012-04-07 18:20 -0400
                          Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-04-07 19:18 -0400
                            Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 jamiekg@wizardling.geek.nz (Jamie Kahn Genet) - 2012-04-08 15:33 +1200
        Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Guenther Fischer <never@spam.invalid> - 2012-04-06 02:27 +0200
    Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2012-04-05 05:21 -0700
    Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> - 2012-04-05 12:44 +0000
      Re: Microsoft Word 1.0 Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> - 2012-04-05 15:54 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#9061

In article <jlqej6$9cl$3@news.albasani.net>, PhillipJones
<pjones1@kimbanet.com> wrote:

> >> > *cough* *hack* *choke* You LIKED Word 6???
> >>
> >> Yes. Even though it looked a carbon copy of the windows 95 version it
> >> worked great except for Mail merge. One feature I miss to this day, if
> >> you clicked ¶ button each Paragraph had a little Black square beside
> >> it. click on that square you could format the entire paragraph with
> >> out formatting the whole document. That has never returned.
> >
> > I thought the black square meant something like: keep with next paragraph.
> >
>   If you double clicked on it. it would select that specific entire 
> paragraph  without having to click at beginning hold shift key and click 
> again at the end. Then they removed the little Black squares.

triple click to select a paragraph. no need for black squares.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9064

nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

> In article <jlqej6$9cl$3@news.albasani.net>, PhillipJones
> <pjones1@kimbanet.com> wrote:
> 
> > >> > *cough* *hack* *choke* You LIKED Word 6???
> > >>
> > >> Yes. Even though it looked a carbon copy of the windows 95 version it
> > >> worked great except for Mail merge. One feature I miss to this day, if
> > >> you clicked ¶ button each Paragraph had a little Black square beside
> > >> it. click on that square you could format the entire paragraph with
> > >> out formatting the whole document. That has never returned.
> > >
> > > I thought the black square meant something like: keep with next paragraph.
> > >
> >   If you double clicked on it. it would select that specific entire
> > paragraph  without having to click at beginning hold shift key and click
> > again at the end. Then they removed the little Black squares.
> 
> triple click to select a paragraph. no need for black squares.

Bet me to it - this works in many word processors.
-- 
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8962

In article <050420121306167202%dogbreath@chaseabone.com.invalid>, sbt
<dogbreath@chaseabone.com.invalid> wrote:

> In article <050420121313474077%never@spam.invalid>, Guenther Fischer
> <never@spam.invalid> wrote:
> 
> > In article
> > <62280271-0b5c-4b1f-a20b-1c45c992d3c2@r9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> > Mulder <nil.bureau.bitbucket@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm looking for a copy of Microsoft Word 1.0 for the Mac. It
> > > originally came on a 3.5" floppy disk, and I just need the actual
> > > program from it.
> > > 
> > > Please, if anybody has it, let me know.
> > 
> > This original was copy protected. It did only run on the original 800k
> > disk. There have been some patches, but they needed a copy of the
> > program.
> > I did throw away my original around 1980 after the third replacement by
> > Microsoft (wear out of the media). Each replacement was waiting 2-3
> > weeks for a new one. This was no fun at all and one of the reasons, why
> > we all hated Bill Gates.
> 
> Minor correction, but that was a 400K disk. The 800K disks didn't
> appear until the MacPlus and Mac 512Ke the following year. MS Word 1.0
> wasn't really very good, not nearly as usable as the 1.05 release that
> held sway for a while.

You are right. I used a German version, which was newer than English
1.00. Anyway, the program was easy to use and it worked fine - but I
hated the copy protection and the permanent disk swapping...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8917

In article 
<62280271-0b5c-4b1f-a20b-1c45c992d3c2@r9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
 Mulder <nil.bureau.bitbucket@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm looking for a copy of Microsoft Word 1.0 for the Mac. It
> originally came on a 3.5" floppy disk, and I just need the actual
> program from it.
> 
> Please, if anybody has it, let me know.

The earliest I have is Microsoft Word 3.01. Sorry.

-- 
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8918

Mulder wrote:
> I'm looking for a copy of Microsoft Word 1.0 for the Mac. It
> originally came on a 3.5" floppy disk, and I just need the actual
> program from it.

Google for "Microsoft Word 1.0 sit". You'll find it.

Geoff.

-- 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson,  N3OWJ/4X1GM
My high blood pressure medicine reduces my midichlorian count. :-(

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#8948

In article <slrnjnr4n0.cau.gsm@cable.mendelson.com>,
 "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> wrote:

> Mulder wrote:
> > I'm looking for a copy of Microsoft Word 1.0 for the Mac. It
> > originally came on a 3.5" floppy disk, and I just need the actual
> > program from it.
> 
> Google for "Microsoft Word 1.0 sit". You'll find it.

Well it's certainly not showing up in my search results for "Microsoft 
Word 1.0 sit". If you are talking about the torrents that show up in the 
list, you should give them a closer look. They aren't what you might 
assume.

-- 
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.apps

csiph-web