Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #9127

Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal)

From Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net>
Newsgroups comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal)
Date 2012-04-10 14:46 -0700
Organization lined up neatly
Message-ID <jm29n9$5td$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References <4f845cfa$0$11841$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 2012-04-10 16:16:56 +0000, Warren Oates said:

> This is a commercial replacement for iCal. Our iCal is totally corrupt
> (events are "bleeding through" from month to month, making it unusable).
> I've tried various "cleaning" programs, removing duplicate items and so
> on, to no avail. I've tried "deleting" events older than x days, to no
> avail. iCal just generally sucks.

Have you tried deleting the entire calendar rather than just events?
> 
> The BusyCal trial version (30 days) seems to eliminate the problem, and
> the application seems much faster and is easier to look at and generally
> better designed, and it responds to Sync Services quickly.

It uses the iCal calendars.  Now that you've used it, perhaps it's 
cleaned up whatever was bugging your iCal calendar and you can use iCal 
again?
> 
> Anyone had any experience with it?

I have it and use it.  Got it as part of one of those 10 app bundles, 
so it was a super cheap deal.  It wasn't the app that I'd actually 
bought the bundle for, so for me, it was effectively a freebie, and, I 
think, a win.

My experience so far is that I like it a lot better than iCal.

Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 12:16 -0400
  Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-10 14:46 -0700
    Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 20:05 -0400
    Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-11 10:29 +0200
      Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2012-04-11 12:20 -0400
      Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-11 11:56 -0700
        Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-12 19:13 +0200
      Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "Ed H." <fake@notreal.net> - 2012-04-26 22:53 -0500
  Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2012-04-11 02:10 +0000
    Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 07:02 -0400
  Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Mike Lane <mike.lane.usenet@ntlworld.co.uk> - 2012-04-11 07:55 +0100
    Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2012-04-11 15:27 +0000
    Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2012-04-11 17:25 +0000
      Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2012-04-12 01:54 +0000
  Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Simon1952@canada.com - 2012-04-11 09:29 -0600
  Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2012-04-11 12:17 -0400

csiph-web