Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.apps > #9127
| From | Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.apps |
| Subject | Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) |
| Date | 2012-04-10 14:46 -0700 |
| Organization | lined up neatly |
| Message-ID | <jm29n9$5td$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <4f845cfa$0$11841$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> |
On 2012-04-10 16:16:56 +0000, Warren Oates said: > This is a commercial replacement for iCal. Our iCal is totally corrupt > (events are "bleeding through" from month to month, making it unusable). > I've tried various "cleaning" programs, removing duplicate items and so > on, to no avail. I've tried "deleting" events older than x days, to no > avail. iCal just generally sucks. Have you tried deleting the entire calendar rather than just events? > > The BusyCal trial version (30 days) seems to eliminate the problem, and > the application seems much faster and is easier to look at and generally > better designed, and it responds to Sync Services quickly. It uses the iCal calendars. Now that you've used it, perhaps it's cleaned up whatever was bugging your iCal calendar and you can use iCal again? > > Anyone had any experience with it? I have it and use it. Got it as part of one of those 10 app bundles, so it was a super cheap deal. It wasn't the app that I'd actually bought the bundle for, so for me, it was effectively a freebie, and, I think, a win. My experience so far is that I like it a lot better than iCal.
Back to comp.sys.mac.apps | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 12:16 -0400
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-10 14:46 -0700
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2012-04-10 20:05 -0400
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-11 10:29 +0200
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2012-04-11 12:20 -0400
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Bread <BreadWithSpam@Fractious.net> - 2012-04-11 11:56 -0700
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Paul Sture <paul@sture.ch> - 2012-04-12 19:13 +0200
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "Ed H." <fake@notreal.net> - 2012-04-26 22:53 -0500
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2012-04-11 02:10 +0000
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Warren Oates <warren.oates@gmail.com> - 2012-04-11 07:02 -0400
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Mike Lane <mike.lane.usenet@ntlworld.co.uk> - 2012-04-11 07:55 +0100
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2012-04-11 15:27 +0000
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Patty Winter <patty1@wintertime.com> - 2012-04-11 17:25 +0000
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) "John Varela" <newlamps@verizon.net> - 2012-04-12 01:54 +0000
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Simon1952@canada.com - 2012-04-11 09:29 -0600
Re: BusyCal (replacement for iCal) Fred Moore <fmoore@gcfn.org> - 2012-04-11 12:17 -0400
csiph-web