Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.advocacy > #149507 > unrolled thread

Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-16 08:50 -0700
    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-16 09:40 -0700
    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-16 18:57 +0200
      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-16 10:02 -0700
        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-10-16 13:56 -0400
      Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-18 14:02 +0200
        Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-18 14:10 +0200
        Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-19 11:18 +1300
          Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-19 19:47 -0400
            Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 07:16 +0000
              Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 12:47 -0400
                Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 09:54 -0700
                Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 10:01 -0700
                Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 19:10 +0000
                  Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 21:16 +0200
                    Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 15:42 -0400
                    Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 13:56 -0700
                      Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 07:20 +0000
                        Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-21 12:48 -0700
                        Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-22 12:02 -0400
            Re: Apple iPhone Duo preorder frenzy (was Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster) Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 01:01 -0700
    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-17 08:43 +0000
      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-17 13:06 -0400
        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-17 21:07 +0000
          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-17 21:40 -0400
            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-17 21:13 -0700
              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-18 15:10 +0000
                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-18 08:15 -0700
                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 13:06 -0400
                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 19:13 +0200
                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 13:26 -0400
                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 19:43 +0200
                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 15:02 -0400
                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 21:10 +0200
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 15:28 -0400
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 12:32 -0700
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 21:42 +0200
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-10-20 17:33 -0400
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 17:45 -0400
                                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 14:55 -0700
                                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 07:29 +0000
                                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 12:33 -0400
                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-21 18:47 +0200
                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 13:35 -0400
                                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-21 19:43 +0200
                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-21 18:55 +0200
                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 13:33 -0400
                                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-21 19:38 +0200
                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-21 12:30 -0700
                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 21:36 +0000
                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 18:23 -0400
                                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-22 20:05 +0000
                                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-23 13:26 -0400
                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 10:46 -0700
                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 19:52 +0200
                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 19:55 +0200
                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 11:36 -0700
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 21:05 +0200
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 12:18 -0700
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Nick Charles <none@none.none> - 2026-10-20 19:11 +0000
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 12:17 -0700
                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 15:11 -0400
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 21:21 +0200
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 15:36 -0400
                                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 21:54 +0200
                                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 17:55 -0400
                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 20:10 +0200
                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 15:19 -0400
                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-20 21:38 +0200
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 17:50 -0400
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 14:56 -0700
                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 22:30 +0000
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 20:56 -0400
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 07:20 +0000
                                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 12:44 -0400
                                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 19:06 +0000
                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 17:06 -0400
                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 20:54 +0000
                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 14:12 -0700
                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 17:52 -0400
                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 22:30 +0000
                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 20:56 -0400
                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 07:09 +0000
                                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 13:04 -0400
                                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-21 19:12 +0200
                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 13:58 -0400
                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 12:26 -0700
                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-21 21:56 +0200
                                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 17:10 -0400
                                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 15:32 -0700
                                          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-22 12:51 +0200
                                            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-22 12:00 -0400
                                              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-22 18:06 +0200
                                                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-23 13:02 -0400
                                                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-23 19:15 +0200
                                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-23 13:33 -0400
                                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-23 10:55 -0700
                                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster John Bokma <contact@johnbokma.com> - 2026-10-23 20:16 +0200
                                                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-23 11:18 -0700
                                                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-24 10:09 -0400
                                                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-23 10:55 -0700
                                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-21 21:21 +0000
                                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-21 17:50 -0400
                                      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-22 19:51 +0000
                                        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-23 12:58 -0400
                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> - 2026-10-21 10:47 +1300
                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 10:27 -0700
            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-18 06:43 +0000
              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-19 19:32 -0400
                Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 06:31 +0000
                  Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 13:13 -0400
                    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-20 10:18 -0700
        Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> - 2026-10-18 14:11 -0700
          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 11:08 -0400
            Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2026-10-20 12:03 -0400
              Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-20 13:39 -0400
          Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Tom Elam <thomas.e.elam@gmail.com> - 2026-10-20 11:12 -0400
    Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2026-10-23 09:50 +0200
      Re: Apple's iPhone Duo Repair Prices Are Out, and Dropping This $2,000 Foldable Could Be a Financial Disaster Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> - 2026-10-23 12:50 -0400

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

#149652

Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>>> For the Windows newsgroup, I'm testing all the free no-registration LLMs,
>>> where I am scheduled to test easemate today, so this is the first query:
>>> <https://www.easemate.ai/webapp/chat?from=ai-chat>
>>> 
>>> Pops this query into that LLM and tell us what you get as the output? 
>> 
>> Lol. Asking an LLM is the refuge of those who can't support their own
>> arguments.
> 
> And yet, I've been proving this claim for a decade, well before LLMs Chris.

A genuine proof only needs doing once. You've spent a decade proving
nothing. The EU now has the data which evidences why you're wrong. 

Take a Class A 5,000 mAh phone and compare it to a Class C 5,000 mAh model.
What do you get?

Hint: about 15-20% less endurance. 

Comparing best with worst - just within the 5,000 mAh models - is about 50%
different. 

Using battery capacity as the main criterion is one dimensional thinking
aka "brain dead". 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149658

Chris wrote:
>> And yet, I've been proving this claim for a decade, well before LLMs Chris.
> 
> A genuine proof only needs doing once. You've spent a decade proving
> nothing. The EU now has the data which evidences why you're wrong. 
> 
> Take a Class A 5,000 mAh phone and compare it to a Class C 5,000 mAh model.
> What do you get?
> 
> Hint: about 15-20% less endurance. 
> 
> Comparing best with worst - just within the 5,000 mAh models - is about 50%
> different. 
> 
> Using battery capacity as the main criterion is one dimensional thinking
> aka "brain dead".

Hi Chris,

You saw the results in this thread below, Chris. yet, you say they're wrong. 

 Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,uk.telecom.mobile
 Subject: EU standards compare Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max & Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra battery lifetime
 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 23:30:04 -0600
 Message-ID: <10rsggs$2vhk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>

There is an intelligent reason I refer to you as a religious zealot, Chris.

Your firmly held belief system is built on Apple's marketing claims & nothing else.

There is no way to prove anything factual to you religious zealot nutcases.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149661

Maria Sophia <mariasophia@comprehension.com> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
>>> And yet, I've been proving this claim for a decade, well before LLMs Chris.
>> 
>> A genuine proof only needs doing once. You've spent a decade proving
>> nothing. The EU now has the data which evidences why you're wrong. 
>>
>> Take a Class A 5,000 mAh phone and compare it to a Class C 5,000 mAh model.
>> What do you get?
>> 
>> Hint: about 15-20% less endurance. 
>> 
>> Comparing best with worst - just within the 5,000 mAh models - is about 50%
>> different. 
>> 
>> Using battery capacity as the main criterion is one dimensional thinking
>> aka "brain dead".
> 
> Hi Chris,
> 
> You saw the results in this thread below, Chris. yet, you say they're wrong. 

Yes. As per usual you're making invalid assumptions. 

>  Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,uk.telecom.mobile
>  Subject: EU standards compare Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max & Samsung Galaxy
> S26 Ultra battery lifetime
>  Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2026 23:30:04 -0600
>  Message-ID: <10rsggs$2vhk$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
> 
> There is an intelligent reason I refer to you as a religious zealot, Chris.
> 
> Your firmly held belief system is built on Apple's marketing claims & nothing else.
> 
> There is no way to prove anything factual to you religious zealot nutcases.

Projection. You wouldn't recognise a fact if it shat on your bed. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149674

Chris wrote:
>> There is no way to prove anything factual to you religious zealot nutcases.
> 
> Projection. You wouldn't recognise a fact if it shat on your bed.

These are facts using similar phones which we chose blind in April, before
we ran the calculations based only EU specifications, which we agreed on.

 iPhone 17 Pro Max hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 18.87 hours
 Samsung S26 Ultra hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 21.82 hours
     *Winner = Samsung (+15.6%)*

 iPhone 17 Pro Max endurance per charge = 53 hours
 Samsung S26 Ultra endurance per charge = 55 hours
     *Winner = Samsung (+3.8%)*

  iPhone 17 Pro Max efficiency (hrs/Ah) = 11.04
  Samsung S26 Ultra efficiency (hrs/Ah) = 11.33
     *Winner = Samsung (+2.6%)*

  iPhone 17 Pro Max calendar life (calculated) = ~6.05 years
  Samsung S26 Ultra calendar life (calculated) = ~7.53 years
     *Winner = Samsung (24.5%)*

Why do you think, given Apple's brilliant marketing spews efficiency 12
times in every 9-page iPhone datasheet, that this iPhone sucks compared to
this comparable Samsung?

Where exactly did Apple cheap out?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149676

On 21/10/2026 19:04, Maria Sophia wrote:

>   iPhone 17 Pro Max hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 18.87 hours
>   Samsung S26 Ultra hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 21.82 hours
>       *Winner = Samsung (+15.6%)*

However, in the real world and not the back of a napkin:

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max	 17:58h	24:26h	15:33h	25:41h	12:08h	17:58h
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 16:23h	37:44h	13:01h	24:48h	9:42h	16:23h

For shit and giggles, let's add the more recent model as well:

Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max	 19:20h	31:23h	17:13h	26:12h	12:09h	19:20h

-- 
Static tumblelog generator: https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog/
Available as Python or Perl. Example tumblelog: https://plurrrr.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149686

John Bokma wrote:
>>   iPhone 17 Pro Max hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 18.87 hours
>>   Samsung S26 Ultra hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 21.82 hours
>>       *Winner = Samsung (+15.6%)*
> 
> However, in the real world and not the back of a napkin:
> 
> Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max	 17:58h	24:26h	15:33h	25:41h	12:08h	17:58h
> Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 16:23h	37:44h	13:01h	24:48h	9:42h	16:23h
> 
> For shit and giggles, let's add the more recent model as well:
> 
> Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max	 19:20h	31:23h	17:13h	26:12h	12:09h	19:20h

For some strange reason, even after discussing this topic on the Apple and
Android newsgroups for about a decade, some people just can't get into
their heads that battery lifetime is measured in years, not in hours.

Sigh... they prove me right every time... 

Apple religious zealot nutcases defend Apple to the death, no matter what,
using the first inane excuse that they can possibly think of, even when
their argument is the wrong metric (i.e., hours versus years).

What's no longer astounding, you can explain that an hour isn't the same as
a year for a decade, and still, the Apple religious zealots don't get it.

Reminds me of when Snit claimed a megabit was the same as a decibel, simply
because he saw a moving graph, so, to Apple zealots, that's the same thing!

 *Snit video purportedly proving that a decibel is a megabitperseconde!*
 <https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo>
 *It's a fact iOS devices can't even graph Wi-Fi signal strength over time*
 <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/PZuec56EWB0>

<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149689

On Oct 21, 2026 at 10:58 AM, Maria Sophia wrote in
11baugk$22l6$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com:
> John Bokma wrote:
>>> iPhone 17 Pro Max hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 18.87 hours
>>> Samsung S26 Ultra hrs of runtime per charge cycle = 21.82 hours
>>> *Winner = Samsung (+15.6%)*
>> 
>> However, in the real world and not the back of a napkin:
>> 
>> Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 17:58h 24:26h 15:33h 25:41h 12:08h 17:58h
>> Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra 16:23h 37:44h 13:01h 24:48h 9:42h 16:23h
>> 
>> For shit and giggles, let's add the more recent model as well:
>> 
>> Apple iPhone 18 Pro Max 19:20h 31:23h 17:13h 26:12h 12:09h 19:20h
> 
> For some strange reason, even after discussing this topic on the Apple
> and Android newsgroups for about a decade, some people just can't get
> into their heads that battery lifetime is measured in years, not in
> hours.

Both matter.

I want my phone to go all day, and not have to replace the battery
often.

Simple.

> 
> Sigh... they prove me right every time...
> 
> Apple religious zealot nutcases defend Apple to the death, no matter
> what, using the first inane excuse that they can possibly think of,
> even when their argument is the wrong metric (i.e., hours versus
> years).
> 
> What's no longer astounding, you can explain that an hour isn't the
> same as a year for a decade, and still, the Apple religious zealots
> don't get it.
> 
> Reminds me of when Snit claimed a megabit was the same as a decibel,
> simply because he saw a moving graph, so, to Apple zealots, that's the
> same thing!

Yet you cannot quote me saying such a thing.
> 
> *Snit video purportedly proving that a decibel is a
> megabitperseconde!* <https://youtu.be/7QaABa6DFIo>
> *It's a fact iOS devices can't even graph Wi-Fi signal strength over
> time*
> <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/PZuec56EWB0>
> 
> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/PZuec56EWB0>
> 
Look at the video. It says no such thing. You simply fail to understand
what you see and hear and read.


-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at
peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149697

On 21/10/2026 19:58, Maria Sophia wrote:

> For some strange reason, even after discussing this topic on the Apple and
> Android newsgroups for about a decade,

You still don't have a clue... That's not a strange reason, that's just 
plain ignorance on your side.

-- 
Static tumblelog generator: https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog/
Available as Python or Perl. Example tumblelog: https://plurrrr.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149700

John Bokma wrote:
>> For some strange reason, even after discussing this topic on the Apple and
>> Android newsgroups for about a decade,
> 
> You still don't have a clue... That's not a strange reason, that's just 
> plain ignorance on your side.

Only you Apple nutcases can't comprehend an hour isn't the same as a year.

And you only make that absurd mistake when defending Apple to the death.

Using the first absurdly inane excuse that pops into your head.

You prove me right about you with every post. 

Sigh... 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149709

On Oct 21, 2026 at 2:10 PM, Maria Sophia wrote in
11bb9on$1kr$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com:
> John Bokma wrote:
>>> For some strange reason, even after discussing this topic on the
>>> Apple and Android newsgroups for about a decade,
>> 
>> You still don't have a clue... That's not a strange reason, that's
>> just plain ignorance on your side.
> 
> Only you Apple nutcases can't comprehend an hour isn't the same as a
> year.

You are the only one who seems confused about that. Seriously, quote
ANYONE else who showed any confusion. If you cannot, well, then it is
you.
> 
> And you only make that absurd mistake when defending Apple to the
> death.

But you cannot quote it.
> 
> Using the first absurdly inane excuse that pops into your head.
> 
> You prove me right about you with every post.
> 
> Sigh...
> 



-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at
peace with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149721

On 21/10/2026 23:10, Maria Sophia wrote:
> John Bokma wrote:
>>> For some strange reason, even after discussing this topic on the Apple and
>>> Android newsgroups for about a decade,
>>
>> You still don't have a clue... That's not a strange reason, that's just
>> plain ignorance on your side.
> 
> Only you Apple nutcases can't comprehend an hour isn't the same as a year.

Once again, your so called kill time ASSumes that a battery is perfect. 
It isn't.

-- 
Static tumblelog generator: https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog/
Available as Python or Perl. Example tumblelog: https://plurrrr.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149733

John Bokma wrote:
>> Only you Apple nutcases can't comprehend an hour isn't the same as a year.
> 
> Once again, your so called kill time ASSumes that a battery is perfect. 
> It isn't.


You prove me right every time you Apple religious zealots defend Apple.

Every absurd excuse is the first inane thought that pops into your head.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149735

On 22/10/2026 18:00, Maria Sophia wrote:
> John Bokma wrote:
>>> Only you Apple nutcases can't comprehend an hour isn't the same as a year.
>>
>> Once again, your so called kill time ASSumes that a battery is perfect.
>> It isn't.

[nothing]

Still foaming at the mouth, I see. And still wrong.

-- 
Static tumblelog generator: https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog/
Available as Python or Perl. Example tumblelog: https://plurrrr.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149763

John Bokma wrote:
> And still wrong.

Your only argument (to defend Apple to the death) is all facts are wrong?

You Apple religious zealot nutcases prove me right about you in every post.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149764

On 23/10/2026 19:02, Maria Sophia wrote:
> John Bokma wrote:
>> And still wrong.
> 
> Your only argument (to defend Apple to the death) is all facts are wrong?

Your napkin calculations of so called kill time are practically wrong, 
making your whole argument using them wrong.

-- 
Static tumblelog generator: https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog/
Available as Python or Perl. Example tumblelog: https://plurrrr.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149767

John Bokma wrote:
>> Your only argument (to defend Apple to the death) is all facts are wrong?
> 
> Your napkin calculations of so called kill time are practically wrong, 
> making your whole argument using them wrong.

You Apple nutcases prove me right about you every time you post. 

It's easy to tell you have no education because you saying everything is
wrong is not how you pass a test. Even in high school, you'd flunk out.

When a normal person claims a calculation is wrong, they give what they
think is the correct calculation, but not you Apple religious zealots.

All you Apple religiouz zealots simply say any calcualtion which doesn't
show Apple in a good light... is wrong... 

               You don't say how.
               You don't say why.

You certainly don't provide any "corrected" calculations.

     *You just say every fact about Apple you don't like... is wrong.*

Why must you Apple religious zealot nutjobs prove me right all the time?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149769

On Oct 23, 2026 at 10:33 AM, Maria Sophia wrote in
11bg5oq$857$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com:
> John Bokma wrote:
>>> Your only argument (to defend Apple to the death) is all facts are
>>> wrong?
>> 
>> Your napkin calculations of so called kill time are practically
>> wrong, making your whole argument using them wrong.
> 
> You Apple nutcases prove me right about you every time you post.
> 
> It's easy to tell you have no education because you saying everything
> is wrong is not how you pass a test. Even in high school, you'd flunk
> out.
> 
> When a normal person claims a calculation is wrong, they give what
> they think is the correct calculation, but not you Apple religious
> zealots.
> 
> All you Apple religiouz zealots simply say any calcualtion which
> doesn't show Apple in a good light... is wrong...
> 
> You don't say how.
> You don't say why.
> 
> You certainly don't provide any "corrected" calculations.
> 
> *You just say every fact about Apple you don't like... is wrong.*
> 
> Why must you Apple religious zealot nutjobs prove me right all the
> time?
> 

GIGO

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace
with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149770

On 23/10/2026 19:33, Maria Sophia wrote:

[..]> It's easy to tell you have no education because you saying 
everything is
> wrong is not how you pass a test. Even in high school, you'd flunk out.
> 
> When a normal person claims a calculation is wrong, they give what they
> think is the correct calculation, but not you Apple religious zealots.

I clearly stated that your calculation is wrong because it doesn't take 
into account the temperature, the natural aging of the battery, 
non-linearity of aging, and how it is *actually* used.

[snip, rest of childish insults]

"
Sure. Here’s what’s wrong with the “Kill Time = Total Life Cycles / 
Daily Cycles” calculation when it comes to real-world battery usage:

1. It ignores calendar aging entirely
Batteries degrade even when not being used — the chemistry inside the 
electrolyte and electrodes breaks down over time regardless of cycle 
count. As we discussed earlier: a 1-year-old battery with 150 cycles 
will almost always outperform a 5-year-old battery with the same 150 
cycles. Your formula (1,200 cycles ÷ 0.436/day ≈ 7.5 years) implicitly 
assumes only cycles matter — but by 7.5 years, the battery will have 
aged chemically regardless of whether it ever actually reaches 1,200 cycles.

2. “Daily cycles” derived from the EU endurance test is an unrealistic 
proxy for real usage
The 55-hour figure comes from a standardized lab test (continuous use 
until full depletion in one go). Nobody uses a phone for 55 hours 
straight and then charges once. Most people charge daily, often 
overnight, with a partial discharge (say, 60% down to 100%, not 0% to 
100%). That shifts real-world cycle accumulation in two opposing ways 
the formula doesn’t capture:

More frequent partial charges can be less stressful per cycle than one 
deep full discharge (partial cycles count only partially toward a “full” 
cycle).
But sitting at 100% overnight more often increases degradation from high 
state-of-charge exposure — something the formula doesn’t account for at all.

3. 80% capacity isn’t “death” — it’s an arbitrary industry threshold
“Kill time” implies the battery stops functioning at that point. It 
doesn’t — the phone keeps working fine well past 80%, often for years, 
just with noticeably shorter battery life per day. There’s no hard 
“death” cliff at cycle 1,200; degradation is continuous, not a sudden 
drop-off.

4. Degradation isn’t linear
The cycle rating (1,200 to 80%) reflects an average under controlled 
test conditions (fixed temperature, fixed charging protocol). In 
practice, degradation often accelerates past a certain point — 
especially from heat and fast charging — rather than proceeding evenly 
the way the formula implies.

5. Usage patterns vary significantly over a device’s lifetime
A new device often gets heavier use (novelty effect), seasons change 
heat exposure, and software updates shift power draw — so “daily cycles” 
isn’t the constant the formula treats it as.

Bottom line: the formula treats battery wear as a simple, linear, 
time-independent cycle problem, when in reality it’s a combination of 
cycle wear and calendar aging and temperature/charging behavior — three 
factors that compound each other, not cleanly divide into one tidy number.
"



-- 
Static tumblelog generator: https://github.com/john-bokma/tumblelog/
Available as Python or Perl. Example tumblelog: https://plurrrr.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149771

On Oct 23, 2026 at 11:16 AM, John Bokma wrote in
11bg89n$224co$1@dont-email.me:
> On 23/10/2026 19:33, Maria Sophia wrote:
> 
> [..]> It's easy to tell you have no education because you saying
> everything is
>> wrong is not how you pass a test. Even in high school, you'd flunk
>> out.
>>
>> When a normal person claims a calculation is wrong, they give what
>> they think is the correct calculation, but not you Apple religious
>> zealots.
> 
> I clearly stated that your calculation is wrong because it doesn't
> take into account the temperature, the natural aging of the battery,
> non-linearity of aging, and how it is *actually* used.

And he snipped it all.
> 
> [snip, rest of childish insults]
> 
> "
> Sure. Here's what's wrong with the "Kill Time = Total Life Cycles /
> Daily Cycles" calculation when it comes to real-world battery usage:
> 
> 1. It ignores calendar aging entirely
> Batteries degrade even when not being used — the chemistry inside the
> electrolyte and electrodes breaks down over time regardless of cycle
> count. As we discussed earlier: a 1-year-old battery with 150 cycles
> will almost always outperform a 5-year-old battery with the same 150
> cycles. Your formula (1,200 cycles ÷ 0.436/day ≈ 7.5 years) implicitly
> assumes only cycles matter — but by 7.5 years, the battery will have
> aged chemically regardless of whether it ever actually reaches 1,200
> cycles.
> 
> 2. "Daily cycles" derived from the EU endurance test is an unrealistic
> proxy for real usage The 55-hour figure comes from a standardized lab
> test (continuous use until full depletion in one go). Nobody uses a
> phone for 55 hours straight and then charges once. Most people charge
> daily, often overnight, with a partial discharge (say, 60% down to
> 100%, not 0% to 100%). That shifts real-world cycle accumulation in
> two opposing ways the formula doesn't capture:
> 
> More frequent partial charges can be less stressful per cycle than one
> deep full discharge (partial cycles count only partially toward a
> "full" cycle). But sitting at 100% overnight more often increases
> degradation from high state-of-charge exposure — something the formula
> doesn't account for at all.
> 
> 3. 80% capacity isn't "death" — it's an arbitrary industry threshold
> "Kill time" implies the battery stops functioning at that point. It
> doesn't — the phone keeps working fine well past 80%, often for years,
> just with noticeably shorter battery life per day. There's no hard
> "death" cliff at cycle 1,200; degradation is continuous, not a sudden
> drop-off.
> 
> 4. Degradation isn't linear
> The cycle rating (1,200 to 80%) reflects an average under controlled
> test conditions (fixed temperature, fixed charging protocol). In
> practice, degradation often accelerates past a certain point —
> especially from heat and fast charging — rather than proceeding evenly
> the way the formula implies.
> 
> 5. Usage patterns vary significantly over a device's lifetime A new
> device often gets heavier use (novelty effect), seasons change heat
> exposure, and software updates shift power draw — so "daily cycles"
> isn't the constant the formula treats it as.
> 
> Bottom line: the formula treats battery wear as a simple, linear,
> time-independent cycle problem, when in reality it's a combination of
> cycle wear and calendar aging and temperature/charging behavior —
> three factors that compound each other, not cleanly divide into one
> tidy number. "

More evidence / reasoning than he ever shares.

-- 
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace
with you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#149782

John Bokma wrote:
>> When a normal person claims a calculation is wrong, they give what they
>> think is the correct calculation, but not you Apple religious zealots.
> 
> I clearly stated that your calculation is wrong because it doesn't take 
> into account the temperature, the natural aging of the battery, 
> non-linearity of aging, and how it is *actually* used.

Again you prove me right, for a whole bunch of reasons, not the least of
which is all the numbers used were published for benchmark conditions, but
even more importantly, show us YOUR NUMBERS that show EU numbers as wrong.

                             You didn't,
                               becasue
                              You can't. 

I always wonder what kind of strange people you zealots are, where I think
you hang out with other zealots who don't expect your idiocy to make sense.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 5 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 4 [5] 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.mac.advocacy

csiph-web