Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.laptops > #182
| From | wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.laptops |
| Subject | Proper security (Was Re: Oh, God) |
| Date | 2011-05-03 20:25 +0000 |
| Organization | Public Access Networks Corp. |
| Message-ID | <ippoc4$l49$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <55a0fff7-e1b7-499f-865c-b6ee68cddc37@r4g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <ionn5v$v0i$1@dont-email.me> <ip4tvm$lhj$3@reader1.panix.com> <ipd2n4$d0t$1@dont-email.me> |
In article <ipd2n4$d0t$1@dont-email.me>, Ryan P. <rdeletepaque@wi.rr.comm> wrote: >> >> How do you run 2K or XP and not be administrator? Well, I suppose > > That's why most people don't do it. Proper security policy would >involve you logging out of your regular user account, and logging on as >an administrator, doing what you need to do, and then logging off and >back on to your user account. Proper security includes not causing so much pain that your policies drive users to non-compliance. If security prevents work from being done 50% of your users will not do any work, and the other 50% will ignore policy. 100% of the security team will have monster.com as their home page. Windows security is not proper security because to maintain good posture requires that you dispense with getting anything useful done. (I'm talking about consumer desktops here. They're actually very good on the server side.) Any organization that deliberately chooses to annoy and antagonize users to convince 3rd party developers to use a different file system layout needs to get their glass navels polished. > > Yes, its annoying to have to switch accounts in order to change screen >resolution or install (or uninstall) anything, but its far more secure. It's much LESS secure because people will not perform actions required for adequate security (such as software updates) and because people will work around the roadblock by exploiting ways to elevate their priveleges or disregard permissions. Perfect security causes 0 pain to legitimate users and 100% pain to intruders. You're suggesting that a guard dog that bites everybody is OK because you can always throw steaks at it until you can sneak by. --- I once worked for an agency that would not allow their computers to connect to any network but one they'd vetted, would not allow you to change settings on their computers, required staff members to travel extensively, and required staff members to use electronic systems to work and communicate while traveling. See the problem? Was this good security or not?
Back to comp.sys.laptops | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Ron <ryon@dslnorthwest.net> - 2011-04-16 15:57 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Pen <nospam@spam.none> - 2011-04-16 19:22 -0400
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Ron <ryon@dslnorthwest.net> - 2011-04-16 17:51 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? retsuhcs@xinap.moc (Mike S.) - 2011-04-17 01:30 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Bob Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 05:47 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Ron <ryon@dslnorthwest.net> - 2011-04-17 17:30 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? BJ <backroadjunkie@sbcglobal.net> - 2011-04-17 04:26 -0500
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Ron <ryon@dslnorthwest.net> - 2011-04-17 17:22 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Pen <nospam@spam.none> - 2011-04-17 20:45 -0400
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? "~misfit~" <sore_n_happy@nospamyahoo.com.au> - 2011-04-18 21:05 +1200
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Charlie Hoffpauir <invalid@invalid.com> - 2011-04-18 11:35 -0500
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? lmarco@panix.com (Lou Marco) - 2011-04-20 06:55 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Ron <ryon@dslnorthwest.net> - 2011-04-21 17:20 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? lmarco@panix.com (Lou Marco) - 2011-04-25 22:49 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? "Ryan P." <rdeletepaque@wi.rr.comm> - 2011-04-17 10:14 -0500
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Ron <ryon@dslnorthwest.net> - 2011-04-17 17:57 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? "Ryan P." <rdeletepaque@wi.rr.comm> - 2011-04-18 19:10 -0500
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? schotty456_at_gmail_dot_com@foo.com (schotty456) - 2011-04-19 15:29 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? Bob Villa <pheeh.zero@gmail.com> - 2011-04-19 09:31 -0700
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? lmarco@panix.com (Lou Marco) - 2011-04-20 07:02 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? "BillW50" <BillW50@aol.kom> - 2011-04-19 12:00 -0500
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? lmarco@panix.com (Lou Marco) - 2011-04-20 07:09 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? "Ryan P." <rdeletepaque@wi.rr.comm> - 2011-04-20 17:36 -0500
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? lmarco@panix.com (Lou Marco) - 2011-04-25 22:52 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? "Ryan P." <rdeletepaque@wi.rr.comm> - 2011-04-28 20:02 -0500
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-02 12:49 -0700
Proper security (Was Re: Oh, God) wrat@panix.com (the wharf rat) - 2011-05-03 20:25 +0000
Re: Proper security (Was Re: Oh, God) Robert Sneddon <fred@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-05-05 13:14 +0100
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? lmarco@panix.com (Lou Marco) - 2011-04-20 06:58 +0000
Re: Oh, God-- What To Do Now? dg <david.goodnow@gmail.com> - 2011-04-21 18:35 -0700
csiph-web