Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware > #71492 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Louis Ohland <ohland@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2026-08-01 07:40 -0500 |
| Last post | 2026-08-01 07:40 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
Deviate DEV129.DGS [Bad DEV129, Naughty DEV129, you MUST be punished!] Louis Ohland <ohland@charter.net> - 2026-08-01 07:40 -0500
| From | Louis Ohland <ohland@charter.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2026-08-01 07:40 -0500 |
| Subject | Deviate DEV129.DGS [Bad DEV129, Naughty DEV129, you MUST be punished!] |
| Message-ID | <114kpgl$us8$1@csiph.com> |
While waiting for power and network to be restored, I had looked through some refdisks. 7080a - DEV129.DGS 31,608, 1990-06-29 70486 - DEV129.DGS 37,417, 1990-06-27 RFP75 - DEV129.DGS 37,527, 1990-09-18 Applying my MENSA-class intellect... I see a pattern. The 7080 lacks an actual processor board and is @ 6KB smaller. The 70486 and P75 BOTH have an actual processor board, and BOTH DEV129.DGS are within @ 100 Bytes of each other. Part of the difference should be due to different POS values. My SWAG is that they are closest, byte-wise.
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.ibm.ps2.hardware
csiph-web