Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #2890 > unrolled thread
| Started by | ultramagnus_tcv <mikew@thecomputervalet.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-08-08 14:00 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-08-08 21:25 -0500 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer
ProTERM alteration? ultramagnus_tcv <mikew@thecomputervalet.com> - 2016-08-08 14:00 -0500
Re: ProTERM alteration? D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-08-08 19:20 +0000
Re: ProTERM alteration? ultramagnus_tcv <mikew@thecomputervalet.com> - 2016-08-08 18:49 -0500
Re: ProTERM alteration? Hugh Hood <hughhood@earthlink.net> - 2016-08-08 21:25 -0500
| From | ultramagnus_tcv <mikew@thecomputervalet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 14:00 -0500 |
| Subject | ProTERM alteration? |
| Message-ID | <noaksc$dsr$1@dont-email.me> |
I posted a version of this message to Facebook the other day, but it got little traction. I am curious if anyone here knows something more. My basic question is this: Has the ProTERM source been released to attempt modifications? Over in the Commodore world, the terminal program StrikeTerm (and Novaterm, I believe) allows one to populate the phone book with hostnames or IP addresses. In StrikeTerm, F5 will bring up the phone book and tapping a letter will cause StrikeTerm to "dial" the BBS via hostname. (e.g. atdt bbs.fozztexx.com) The hardware I use to connect to my home network provides the necessary firmware for TCP/IP connectivity. Over the last few months, I've been using a combination of tcpser and ProTERM 3.2 on a //e to connect to telnet hosted BBSs. However, ProTERM can't dial via its internal phone book as StrikeTerm does. It seems as if ProTERM accepts storing an entry with an alphanumeric "phone number." But ProTERM never connects to a BBS dialed this way. There are ways around this, of course. If you put ProTERM online and type "atdt hostname" at the terminal, you get connected just as easily. However, it would be nice to use the on-board phone book to store favorite BBSs and dial quickly. I haven't done extensive testing. For instance, I assume that since ProTERM isn't managing a connection to a BBS "dialed" via the phonebook that it's not actually passing "atdt hostname" to tcpser. Flipping on the debug argument in tcpser would reveal what it's seeing. If ProTERM is passing the dial string correctly but asserting a "hang up" when it doesn't see a carrier, that would be another necessary alteration either in ProTERM or, perhaps, via tcpser's arguments. I'm curious about any opinions here. Cheers, Mike Whalen
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1470684042@macgui.com> |
| In reply to | #2890 |
ultramagnus_tcv wrote: > > My basic question is this: Has the ProTERM source been released to > attempt modifications? Do you remember reading this post by Hugh Hood to csa2 earlier this year? http://macgui.com/usenet/?group=1&id=280461 If I'm not mistaken, Jerry Cline is the man you should ask: http://localbiziness.com/biz/pat--jerry-cline-ff135f844 -- ]DF$ The Marina IP stack for Apple II-- http://marina.a2hq.com/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | ultramagnus_tcv <mikew@thecomputervalet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 18:49 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <nob5pj$99h$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2892 |
On 2016-08-08 19:20:44 +0000, D Finnigan said: > Do you remember reading this post by Hugh Hood to csa2 earlier this year? > http://macgui.com/usenet/?group=1&id=280461 No, I didn't but I am not quite as a regular reader than most. The good news is that there may be no modification needed. I realized that I had been playing it safe by using the Null Modem driver. The Dial items clearly didn't work with that. However, switching to the Hayes Smartmodem 2400 driver and removing the init string (not needed for tcpser) worked fine! There is one BBS that doesn't seem to work this way, but I am speaking to the Sysop about it. m
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hugh Hood <hughhood@earthlink.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-08-08 21:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <D-qdneRiMp9wozTKnZ2dnUU7-bXNnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #2894 |
Mike, I'm glad you figured it out. When I saw your initial request yesterday, I supposed that it was probably just ProTERM's masking out of non-numeric characters entered for a dialing number in its 'phone book', and would be an easy 3 or 4 byte patch. But today I tried it with alpha characters and it accepted (and saved) them so I knew it would take a little bit more detective work inside the ProTERM code to see exactly what was going on. Fortunately, you discovered that as long as you stay away from the Null Modem/Null Modem(RTS/CTS) drivers, it _will_ send whatever you put in the 'phone number' field. I'll make a note for future reference. Thanks. Hugh Hood On 8/8/2016 6:49 PM, ultramagnus_tcv wrote: > On 2016-08-08 19:20:44 +0000, D Finnigan said: > >> Do you remember reading this post by Hugh Hood to csa2 earlier this year? >> http://macgui.com/usenet/?group=1&id=280461 > > > No, I didn't but I am not quite as a regular reader than most. > > The good news is that there may be no modification needed. I realized > that I had been playing it safe by using the Null Modem driver. The Dial > items clearly didn't work with that. However, switching to the Hayes > Smartmodem 2400 driver and removing the init string (not needed for > tcpser) worked fine! There is one BBS that doesn't seem to work this > way, but I am speaking to the Sysop about it. > > m >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.apple2.programmer
csiph-web