Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #1306
| From | Jeff Blakeney <CUTjeffrey_blakeney@yahoo.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.apple2.programmer |
| Subject | Re: 80 column card RAM disk |
| Date | 2014-09-02 07:53 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lu4b31$m60$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <96730f4e-8bc7-4603-9159-2f1dbbaaf37f@googlegroups.com> <1lrcf76.xrclj41u5dr3tN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> <1lrcgip.y6uy66xszhbtN%dempson@actrix.gen.nz> |
On 01/09/2014 7:44 PM, David Empson wrote: > One other point I forgot to mention: I expect that the main reason > blocks 4-7 are reserved is to deal with software which expects most of > those to be the root directory and volume bitmap, and so that some of > the memory addresses line up nicely (once you get beyond the complex > remapping). Except that one every other ProDOS volume that is less than 2 MB in size, the first block available for storing files is block 7, not block 8, so I still don't understand why block 7 is marked as used. Perhaps simply because they needed to drop another block as they didn't have another 512 byte chunk of memory to use so tossed a coin to determine whether to drop block 7 or block 125. Or perhaps someone said that the first 7 blocks were already used (blocks 0 to 6) and someone else assumed that meant that the first available block would be 8. :)
Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
80 column card RAM disk ivan@ivanx.com - 2014-09-01 15:05 -0700
Re: 80 column card RAM disk dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-09-02 11:41 +1200
Re: 80 column card RAM disk dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-09-02 11:44 +1200
Re: 80 column card RAM disk Jeff Blakeney <CUTjeffrey_blakeney@yahoo.ca> - 2014-09-02 07:53 -0400
Re: 80 column card RAM disk Jeff Blakeney <CUTjeffrey_blakeney@yahoo.ca> - 2014-09-02 07:46 -0400
Re: 80 column card RAM disk dempson@actrix.gen.nz (David Empson) - 2014-09-03 14:15 +1200
Re: 80 column card RAM disk Jeff Blakeney <CUTjeffrey_blakeney@yahoo.ca> - 2014-09-02 22:36 -0400
Re: 80 column card RAM disk Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net> - 2014-09-05 14:27 -0700
Re: 80 column card RAM disk Jeff Blakeney <CUTjeffrey_blakeney@yahoo.ca> - 2014-09-01 20:09 -0400
csiph-web