Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.apple2.programmer > #2889
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.apple2.programmer |
| Subject | Re: identifying enhanced IIe |
| Date | Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:20:38 -0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Mac GUI |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <dog_cow-1470676837@macgui.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ff0256c8-5fe7-4706-b3a3-325ed518d807@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Mon, 8 Aug 2016 17:20:38 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ac9e0e4d7dd3957fb97803ee6801bab8"; logging-data="25425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190kBoAnO6+4q10VOwSITok" |
| User-Agent | Mac GUI Usenet |
| In-Reply-To | <ff0256c8-5fe7-4706-b3a3-325ed518d807@googlegroups.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:GfiDPqQVjEqNewrNdj753K2wBHE= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.sys.apple2.programmer:2889 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Mark Lemmert wrote: > Does anyone know if the following is a valid test to determine whether an > Apple IIe is enhanced or unenhanced? It seem like it should work, but I > want to double check. Here is an oldie but a goodie: http://macgui.com/usenet/?group=7&id=9234#msg Also, how strict is your definition of enhanced IIe? Do you want the royal flush: 65C02, 1985 firmware, and updated video ROM? Or just the 65C02? -- ]DF$ The Marina IP stack for Apple II-- http://marina.a2hq.com/
Back to comp.sys.apple2.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
identifying enhanced IIe Mark Lemmert <mark.lemmert@gmail.com> - 2016-08-07 16:27 -0700
identifying enhanced IIe Antoine Vignau <antoine.vignau@laposte.net> - 2016-08-07 20:35 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe qkumba <peter.ferrie@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 07:55 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe Mark Lemmert <mark.lemmert@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 18:34 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe John Brooks <jbrooks@blueshiftinc.com> - 2016-08-09 21:16 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe Mark Lemmert <mark.lemmert@gmail.com> - 2016-11-03 18:47 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2016-11-03 23:00 -0400
Re: identifying enhanced IIe 6502workshop@gmail.com - 2016-11-05 08:27 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe Mark Lemmert <mark.lemmert@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 18:32 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-08-08 17:20 +0000
Re: identifying enhanced IIe Michael Pohoreski <michael.pohoreski@gmail.com> - 2016-08-08 16:05 -0700
Re: identifying enhanced IIe roger.shimada@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 09:44 -0800
Re: identifying enhanced IIe roger.shimada@gmail.com - 2016-11-06 10:02 -0800
Re: identifying enhanced IIe 6502workshop@gmail.com - 2016-11-07 10:44 -0800
Re: identifying enhanced IIe D Finnigan <dog_cow@macgui.com> - 2016-11-07 20:27 +0000
Re: identifying enhanced IIe roger.shimada@gmail.com - 2016-11-08 19:39 -0800
Re: identifying enhanced IIe "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net> - 2016-11-10 03:24 -0600
Re: identifying enhanced IIe Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2016-11-10 09:39 -0500
Re: identifying enhanced IIe "Bill Buckels" <bbuckels@mts.net> - 2016-11-10 11:55 -0600
Re: identifying enhanced IIe Steve Nickolas <usotsuki@buric.co> - 2016-11-10 13:04 -0500
csiph-web