Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #1214 > unrolled thread

SharedUnixLib

Back to article view | Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer

Contents

  SharedUnixLib Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-12-21 21:05 +0000
    Re: SharedUnixLib David Pitt <pittdj@pittdj.co.uk> - 2011-12-22 07:36 +0000
    Re: SharedUnixLib wpb <w.blatchley@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-22 11:08 -0800
      Re: SharedUnixLib Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2011-12-22 20:25 +0000
        Re: SharedUnixLib wpb <w.blatchley@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-27 09:18 -0800
          Re: SharedUnixLib Chris Gransden <chrisg@care4free.net> - 2011-12-28 11:25 +0000
            Re: SharedUnixLib wpb <w.blatchley@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-28 10:52 -0800
              Re: SharedUnixLib wpb <w.blatchley@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-28 12:46 -0800
      Re: SharedUnixLib Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-12-22 21:21 +0000
    Re: SharedUnixLib John Tytgat <this@is.invalid> - 2011-12-30 14:18 +0100
      Re: SharedUnixLib Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> - 2011-12-31 15:09 +0000
        Re: SharedUnixLib Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-12-31 16:28 +0000

#1214 — SharedUnixLib

Does anyone know where version 1.13 of the sharedUnixLib can be
found? The latest I have is 1.11, and searching via Google leads only
to links to 1.11. The latest Netsurf comes with version 1.10 of the
library.

However, I have been trying to run software that is asking for
version 1.13.

-- 
Chris Johnson

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1215

In message <52453e6575chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net>
  Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+news@spamcop.net> wrote:

> Does anyone know where version 1.13 of the sharedUnixLib can be
> found? The latest I have is 1.11, and searching via Google leads only
> to links to 1.11. The latest Netsurf comes with version 1.10 of the
> library.

> However, I have been trying to run software that is asking for
> version 1.13.

It might be worth asking on the gccsdk list, I did find a reference to 
SharedUnixLib 1.13 in a thread "VFP in GCC 4.6".

http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc@gccsdk.riscos.info/msg01435.html


-- 
David Pitt

MessengerPro 6 on an ARMini running RISC OS 5

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1219

On Dec 21, 10:05 pm, Chris Johnson <chrisjohnson+n...@spamcop.net>
wrote:
> Does anyone know where version 1.13 of the sharedUnixLib can be
> found? The latest I have is 1.11, and searching via Google leads only
> to links to 1.11. The latest Netsurf comes with version 1.10 of the
> library.
>
> However, I have been trying to run software that is asking for
> version 1.13.
>
> --
> Chris Johnson

Try here: ftp://www.a4com.dyndns.org/pub/Beagle/

Just found it the other day. Hoped it would fix a bug. Didn't ;(

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1220

wpb <w.blatchley@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Try here: ftp://www.a4com.dyndns.org/pub/Beagle/
> 
> Just found it the other day. Hoped it would fix a bug. Didn't ;(

What was the bug, OOI?

SharedUnixLib is tiny, it doesn't actually do very much.  But certain
functions have to be in a module rather than in application space, so
they're in SUL.  It doesn't contain the whole library functionality like
SharedCLibrary does.

Theo

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1228

On Dec 22, 9:25 pm, Theo Markettos <theom+n...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
wrote:

> What was the bug, OOI?

A bit obscure, but completely repeatable. I was trying to check out
the IconV sources via svn into a TBAFS archive. Here are the moments
before the bang:

*svn co svn://svn.netsurf-browser.org/trunk/iconv
A    iconv/test
A    iconv/test/iconv.c
[...snipped...]
A    iconv/test/GNU/EUC-JISX0213.TXT
A    iconv/test/GNU/CP437.TXT

Fatal signal received: Aborted

Stack backtrace:

Running thread 0x3f5a3c
  (  4b6250) pc:   1bba24 lr:   23f980 sp:   4b6254
__write_backtrace()
  (  4b62f4) pc:   23f4e4 lr:    124bc sp:   4b62f8
__unixlib_raise_signal()
  (  4b6304) pc:    12498 lr:    1b424 sp:   4b6308  raise()
  (  4b6318) pc:    1b3f0 lr:    510e0 sp:   4b631c  abort()
  (  4b6330) pc:    510d0 lr:   14f3d4 sp:   4b6334
^abort_on_pool_failure()
  (  4b6360) pc:   14f2b8 lr:    4faf8 sp:   4b6364  apr_palloc()
  (  4b6388) pc:    4fad4 lr:    507f0 sp:   4b638c  ^my__realloc()
  (  4b63ac) pc:    50728 lr:   34a000 sp:   4b63b0
svn_stringbuf_ensure()
  (  4b63f8) pc:   349f4c lr:    81aa4 sp:   4b63fc
^convert_to_stringbuf()
  (  4b6434) pc:    81a50 lr:    82164 sp:   4b6438
^convert_cstring()
  (  4b6464) pc:    820d0 lr:   17dbfc sp:   4b6468
svn_utf_cstring_from_utf8()
  (  4b6494) pc:   17db7c lr:   2059d4 sp:   4b6498
svn_path_cstring_from_utf8()
  (  4b6534) pc:   2058a8 lr:   2d99a8 sp:   4b6538
svn_io_open_unique_file2()
  (  4b65d8) pc:   2d9934 lr:    a228c sp:   4b65dc
svn_io_copy_file()
  (  4b6634) pc:    a2150 lr:   169c1c sp:   4b6638
svn_subst_copy_and_translate3()
  (  4b6694) pc:   16995c lr:   16b98c sp:   4b6698
svn_wc_translated_file2()
  (  4b66f0) pc:   16b810 lr:   2ab050 sp:   4b66f4
^file_xfer_under_path()
  (  4b6740) pc:   2aaf40 lr:    90e04 sp:   4b6744
^log_do_file_xfer()
  (  4b6778) pc:    90b04 lr:   265cdc sp:   4b677c  ^start_handler()
  (  4b679c) pc:   265ca0 lr:   25e5b0 sp:   4b67a0
^expat_start_handler()
  (  4b6838) pc:   25d884 lr:   25d394 sp:   4b683c  ^doContent()
  (  4b6864) pc:   25d354 lr:   1564b4 sp:   4b6868
^contentProcessor()
  (  4b68a0) pc:   1563ec lr:   1563b0 sp:   4b68a4  XML_ParseBuffer()
  (  4b68d0) pc:   156298 lr:   2a38b0 sp:   4b68d4  XML_Parse()
  (  4b690c) pc:   2a3880 lr:    ae8dc sp:   4b6910  svn_xml_parse()
  (  4b6974) pc:    ae638 lr:    aebf4 sp:   4b6978  ^run_log()
  (  4b6994) pc:    aebcc lr:   330818 sp:   4b6998  svn_wc__run_log()
  (  4b69fc) pc:   330420 lr:    534c4 sp:   4b6a00
^close_directory()
  (  4b6a28) pc:    53448 lr:   186514 sp:   4b6a2c
^close_directory()
  (  4b6a5c) pc:   186474 lr:   1a3460 sp:   4b6a60
^ra_svn_handle_close_dir()
  (  4b6acc) pc:   1a32f0 lr:   186ae8 sp:   4b6ad0
svn_ra_svn__drive_editorp()
  (  4b6b14) pc:   186a94 lr:   186bc0 sp:   4b6b18
svn_ra_svn_drive_editor2()
  (  4b6b40) pc:   186b84 lr:    ad0b0 sp:   4b6b44
svn_ra_svn_drive_editor()
  (  4b6b6c) pc:    acffc lr:   26f3f8 sp:   4b6b70
^ra_svn_finish_report()
  (  4b6c38) pc:   26ed78 lr:   16ff7c sp:   4b6c3c
svn_wc_crawl_revisions2()
  (  4b6cf4) pc:   16faac lr:   1746e4 sp:   4b6cf8
svn_client__update_internal()
  (  4b6d78) pc:   1742f4 lr:   174aec sp:   4b6d7c
svn_client__checkout_internal()
  (  4b6db4) pc:   174a90 lr:   17b46c sp:   4b6db8
svn_client_checkout2()
  (  4b6e38) pc:   17b018 lr:   2b3834 sp:   4b6e3c
svn_cl__checkout()
  (  4b6fe4) pc:   2b1ee4 lr:    ea308 sp:   4b6fe8  main()
  (  4b6ff4) pc:    ea2f0 lr:     adc8 sp:   4b6ff8  _main()

*

It always dies after the iconv/test/GNU/CP437.TXT file, and always
after a long time of just sitting there (a few minutes). Although the
long delay is still there if I check out to IDEFS (a9home) instead of
TBAFS, it doesn't crash.

So it's some interaction of !svn (v 1..4.4 - the latest I think) and
TBAFS. It seems like a memory exhaustion issue, and, in hindsight, is
probably nothing to do with SUL at all, but perhaps to do with the
remainder of the statically linked UnixLib. Or a bug in !svn. Or a bug
in TBAFS.

WPB

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1229

In article
<496a425e-d674-4ee7-a0fc-a1cca2c4cc26@c6g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>,
   wpb <w.blatchley@yahoo.com> wrote:

> So it's some interaction of !svn (v 1..4.4 - the latest I think) and
> TBAFS. It seems like a memory exhaustion issue, and, in hindsight, is
> probably nothing to do with SUL at all, but perhaps to do with the
> remainder of the statically linked UnixLib. Or a bug in !svn. Or a bug
> in TBAFS.

There's a newer version of subversion (1.6.12) on riscos.info you could
try. 

http://www.riscos.info/packages/DevelopmentDetails.html#Subversion

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1230

On Dec 28, 12:25 pm, Chris Gransden <chr...@care4free.net> wrote:

> There's a newer version of subversion (1.6.12) on riscos.info you could
> try.
>

Great! Thanks - I'll give it a try!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1231

On Dec 28, 7:52 pm, wpb <w.blatch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Dec 28, 12:25 pm, Chris Gransden <chr...@care4free.net> wrote:
>
> > There's a newer version of subversion (1.6.12) on riscos.info you could
> > try.
>
> Great! Thanks - I'll give it a try!

Update: That worked. Great stuff! In an ideal world, I'd track down
the bug I was seeing before, but there are too many other bugs in the
world that need attention! Cheers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1221

In article
<2a01845f-51fd-4b64-9321-30346e143865@z1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>,
   wpb <w.blatchley@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Try here: ftp://www.a4com.dyndns.org/pub/Beagle/

> Just found it the other day. Hoped it would fix a bug. Didn't ;(

Thanks for that.

-- 
Chris Johnson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1232

On 12/21/2011 10:05 PM, Chris Johnson wrote:
> Does anyone know where version 1.13 of the sharedUnixLib can be
> found? The latest I have is 1.11, and searching via Google leads only
> to links to 1.11. The latest Netsurf comes with version 1.10 of the
> library.
>
> However, I have been trying to run software that is asking for
> version 1.13.

Please note that SharedUnixLibrary v1.13 is not an official released 
version and might cause compatibility problems in the future.  The 
latest version released is v1.11 and v1.12 is queued for the next GCCSDK 
release.

John.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1236

In message <jdkdoe$f72$1@dont-email.me>
          John Tytgat <this@is.invalid> wrote:

> On 12/21/2011 10:05 PM, Chris Johnson wrote:
> > Does anyone know where version 1.13 of the sharedUnixLib can be
> > found? The latest I have is 1.11, and searching via Google leads only
> > to links to 1.11. The latest Netsurf comes with version 1.10 of the
> > library.
> >
> > However, I have been trying to run software that is asking for
> > version 1.13.
> 
> Please note that SharedUnixLibrary v1.13 is not an official released 
> version and might cause compatibility problems in the future.  The 
> latest version released is v1.11 and v1.12 is queued for the next GCCSDK 
> release.

JOOI: who created v1.13, and why?  What does it offer that 1.10 or 1.11
don't?

Dave

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1237

In article <bf1a444a52.davehigton@dsl.pipex.com>,
   Dave Higton <davehigton@dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
> JOOI: who created v1.13, and why?  What does it offer that 1.10 or
> 1.11 don't?

I think it is for use with binaries compiled for BB and using the new
hardware FP, but I could have misunderstood.

-- 
Chris Johnson

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.sys.acorn.programmer

csiph-web