Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.programmer > #260
| From | Matthew Wightman <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.programmer |
| Subject | Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? |
| Date | 2011-04-30 11:09 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ipgn55$kdi$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <op.vupcgvdvn5ksl5@richard> <ipfapn$r1g$1@dont-email.me> <op.vuqvirovn5ksl5@richard> |
On 30/04/2011 10:33, Richard Russell wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 22:32:35 +0100, Matthew Wightman > <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As far as I can tell, the document you describe is the Brandy Basic >> "Basic V Guide". It can be found as "basic" in the docs directory of >> the Brandy distribution available on SourceForge > > Interesting. There's no mention of Brandy by name in the file. > > Are you suggesting that LIBRARY LOCAL was a feature devised specifically > for Brandy, or that it was originally intended for ARM BASIC but > abandoned or removed for some reason? At the time of my previous post, I was guessing. I've now seen http://www.apdl.co.uk/riscworld/volume1/issue7/brandy/index.htm (An article in RISCWorld about Brandy Basic by Dave Daniels) which mentions that libraries having private variables is a Brandy extension. > > Given that Brandy doesn't in general extend the language (apart from the > longer strings) it seems somewhat strange to me that this one feature > would have been added. If the intention had been to extend BBC BASIC, > many other (arguably more valuable) additions could have been > implemented at the same time. Looking through the Brandy documentation, there do seem to be a number of other extensions, in addition to the ones mentioned in the article. -- Matthew Wightman
Back to comp.sys.acorn.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2011-04-29 14:44 +0100
Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? Matthew Wightman <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 22:32 +0100
Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? "Richard Russell" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2011-04-30 10:33 +0100
Re: What happened to LIBRARY LOCAL? Matthew Wightman <matthew.wightman@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 11:09 +0100
csiph-web