Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: Remove all standard library functions that depend on intmax_t |
| Date | 2020-05-08 21:42 +0200 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <r94co0$dd0$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | <r90pk2$kcn$1@solani.org> <87r1vvti6o.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> |
Am 08.05.20 um 01:54 schrieb Keith Thompson: > > Do you have a reference to this? Did they really decide to remove > intmax_t altogether? > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2498.pdf (dated > 2020-02-29) is a proposal to keep (u)intmax_t but deprecate library > functions that depend on them. Removing (u)intmax_t altogether would > break existing code. > > See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/PreFreiburg2020.htm > for some other similar proposals. > > [...] > See N2516, "Draft April 2020 meeting minutes". First there was a "Straw Poll: Do we want to make any changes to intmax_t? 12-5-0 (passes)". Then all proposals for changes to or replacements for intmax_t failed in the individual straw polls. Then there was a "Straw Poll: Should the committee pursue something along the lines of deprecating intmax_t as a type? 7-3-5 (passes)"
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Remove all standard library functions that depend on intmax_t Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-07 12:58 +0200
Re: Remove all standard library functions that depend on intmax_t Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-05-07 16:54 -0700
Re: Remove all standard library functions that depend on intmax_t Philipp Klaus Krause <pkk@spth.de> - 2020-05-08 21:42 +0200
csiph-web