Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.std.c > #1375

Re: Structure Packing.

Show key headers only | View raw

Eric Sosman wrote:

> > The current implementation allocates next fit for each structure element.
> >
> > As the day goes on I am getting convinced that it is a bad idea.
>
>      Perhaps structs are not the right tool for the job?  Instead of
>
>         struct {
>             unsigned char flag;
>             double value;
>         } data[1000];
>
> ... you might do better to write
>
>         unsigned char data_flag[1000];
>         double data_value[1000];
>
> ("Parallel arrays" were bread-and-butter for languages that didn't
> have struct-like things, but seem to have fallen into disuse.  The
> struct is a great help, but it is not the only way to skin cats.)

My job is to take what our customers write in their application
code and optimize within their expectations and the standards
documents.

This whole question started to show itself with a piece of customer
code that has a large struct array with about 25 % of the ram
space un-used. This specific customer is happy by moving two lines
and saving (as it turns out) all of his hole space.

This conversation a few days ago started me looking into
how far I could push the envelope from the compiler end.
to just make the problem go away.

From a customer point of view there isn't an easy way to
identify the solution to the problem without knowing a quite
a bit about both this specific hardware and the C compiler
constraints allocating struct space. There are several data
types involved. It is information a programmer should not
need to know at that level of detail for most routine applications

Having the compiler make an intelligent suggestion is a
workable solution. If there is any message in this thread it is
don't even consider messing with standards and conventions.

w..



w..

Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Structure Packing. John Kearney <dethrophes@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-06 17:27 -0700
  Re: Structure Packing. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-06 21:19 -0400
    Re: Structure Packing. Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-06-11 22:39 -0400
      Re: Structure Packing. Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-12 09:21 -0400
        Re: Structure Packing. Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-06-12 11:51 -0400
          Re: Structure Packing. Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2012-06-12 18:37 +0200
            Re: Structure Packing. Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-06-12 15:06 -0400
              Re: Structure Packing. Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-12 16:22 -0400
                Re: Structure Packing. Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-06-12 17:44 -0400
                Re: Structure Packing. Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2012-06-13 15:53 +0200
                Re: Structure Packing. Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-06-18 12:37 +0300
        Re: Structure Packing. Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-12 16:22 +0000
          Re: Structure Packing. Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-06-12 15:24 -0400
            Re: Structure Packing. Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-06-12 16:33 -0400
              Re: Structure Packing. Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-06-12 17:17 -0400
  Re: Structure Packing. Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-06 18:35 -0700
    Re: Structure Packing. John Kearney <dethrophes@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-06 21:58 -0700
      Re: Structure Packing. Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-06 23:54 -0700
        Re: Structure Packing. John Kearney <dethrophes@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-07 07:47 -0700
          Re: Structure Packing. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-06-07 12:39 -0400
    Re: Structure Packing. jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-06-07 11:14 +0200
      Re: Structure Packing. Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-06-07 09:46 -0700
        Re: Structure Packing. John Kearney <dethrophes@googlemail.com> - 2012-06-07 11:57 -0700

csiph-web