Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.software.config-mgmt > #29
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++, comp.software.config-mgmt |
| Subject | Re: Incremental build systems, infamake |
| Date | 2011-07-25 23:41 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <99532pFkjuU9@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <994rjoFkjuU7@mid.individual.net> <041c04ac-e74a-4674-ba39-fe794b5c1d89@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com> <d6e7ed2c-b5c3-4b07-a565-b7e5159bb34a@u28g2000prm.googlegroups.com> <994uf9FkjuU8@mid.individual.net> <e480765a-ea92-493e-ac0f-dd8391d7a541@r28g2000prb.googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 07/25/11 10:25 PM, Joshua Maurice wrote: > On Jul 25, 3:22 am, Ian Collins<ian-n...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> On 07/25/11 10:04 PM, Joshua Maurice wrote: >> >>> It seems to be a solution very integrated with the Sun C compiler from >>> what my google-fu can uncover. Specifically, it does not seem >>> portable. Hell, it's not even really specified what it does and does >>> not do. I think the above quote is from the actual manual, and I'm not >>> going to find better offhand. >> >> It works with gcc as well, on Solaris and Linux. I use both compilers >> on both platforms. If I have to deploy elsewhere, I still develop on >> one of my preferred platforms, where I know incremental builds work. >> >>> So, I feel a little better, as I may not have been wasting my time >>> doing something that's already been done. Portability is a rather >>> stringent requirement for a build system for my company. It's also >>> woefully inadequate for my company as we do more than simple C >>> compilation. We do C++, Java, some custom code generation, an Eclipse >>> plugin build, and a few more odds and ends. >> >> So do I, excluding (spit) Java. > > Know if it's open source? No. It almost was, but no Oracle is in charge, I doubt it ever will be. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.software.config-mgmt | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 00:25 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-25 21:00 +1200
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 02:11 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-25 21:33 +1200
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 02:38 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-25 21:55 +1200
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 03:04 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-25 22:22 +1200
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 03:25 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-25 23:41 +1200
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-07-26 16:11 +0000
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-26 15:19 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-26 15:28 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-26 15:49 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-07-25 12:52 +0100
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-25 13:34 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-07-27 19:49 +0100
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Joshua Maurice <joshuamaurice@gmail.com> - 2011-07-29 03:58 -0700
Re: Incremental build systems, infamake Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-07-26 15:04 +0000
csiph-web