Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.software-eng

comp.software-eng

3579 articles (numbers 24 – 3985) — threaded view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date [asc]
Experts would agree that my reviewers are incorrect olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-05-24 09:40 -0500
Network Security Engineer _ Denver, Colorado_12 month plus C2C Satish Chaturvedi <satish.crotoneits@gmail.com> 2022-05-24 08:59 -0700
Re: Refuting the HP proofs (adapted for software engineers) Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> 2022-06-04 00:35 +0100
Re: Refuting the HP proofs (adapted for software engineers) Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc.corp> 2022-06-04 00:36 +0100
Re: Refuting the HP proofs (adapted for software engineers)[ Andy Walker ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-06-03 18:56 -0500
Competent software engineers will agree that H(P,P)==0 is correct olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-06-06 10:24 -0500
Press Release - AEiC 2022, Ada-Europe Reliable Softw. Technol. dirk@orka.cs.kuleuven.be. (Dirk Craeynest) 2022-06-12 21:00 +0000
Conquering the last rebuttal to H(P,P)==0 refutation of the halting problem proofs olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-06-27 06:11 -0500
Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-02 10:34 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-02 17:26 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-02 11:42 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-02 12:15 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-02 18:26 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-02 12:30 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-02 19:28 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-02 13:41 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-02 19:44 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-02 16:26 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-02 23:05 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-02 17:13 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-03 15:27 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-03 09:57 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-03 16:21 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-03 10:30 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-03 16:45 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-03 10:48 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-03 16:51 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-03 11:05 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-03 17:07 +0100
Re: Should any program that calls a halt decider be considered pathological? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-03 11:45 -0500
Re: Should any program that calls a halt decider be considered pathological? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-03 17:55 +0100
Re: Should any program that calls a halt decider be considered pathological? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-03 12:07 -0500
Re: Should any program that calls a halt decider be considered pathological? Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-03 18:12 +0100
Re: Should any program that calls a halt decider be considered pathological? olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-03 12:17 -0500
Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 09:45 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 11:54 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 11:57 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-04 18:25 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 12:33 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-04 18:39 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 12:51 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-04 18:54 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 13:00 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-04 19:38 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 14:09 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 Mr Flibble <flibble@reddwarf.jmc> 2022-07-04 20:13 +0100
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 14:17 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 14:21 -0500
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering V2 Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2022-07-04 15:40 -0400
Re: Halting problem proofs refuted on the basis of software engineering [ Curry–Howard correspondence ] olcott <NoOne@NoWhere.com> 2022-07-04 18:08 -0500

« Previous 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 ... 72 Next »

csiph-web