Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #1934 > unrolled thread

Undo/Redo

Started byBarak Shoshany <baraksh@gmail.com>
First post2011-04-30 09:53 +0000
Last post2011-05-03 09:46 +0000
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica


Contents

  Undo/Redo Barak Shoshany <baraksh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 09:53 +0000
    Re: Undo/Redo "Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 09:46 +0000

#1934 — Undo/Redo

FromBarak Shoshany <baraksh@gmail.com>
Date2011-04-30 09:53 +0000
SubjectUndo/Redo
Message-ID<ipgm7m$8t2$1@smc.vnet.net>
This seems to be a recurring subject in this group.

Mathematica is now at version 8 and there's still no multiple undo and
redo functionality. I don't understand how such an amazing piece of
software can lack such a trivial feature. Why isn't Woflram doing
anything about it? Heck, I'll even write the code for undo/redo myself
for them for free if they let me. Is there someone at Wolfram I can
complain on the matter? Perhaps an internet petition is in order? What
do you think?

Barak

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#2052

From"Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries@gmail.com>
Date2011-05-03 09:46 +0000
Message-ID<ipoiti$g5s$1@smc.vnet.net>
In reply to#1934
I  would second the motion that the most simple multiple undo should
do. Just input text undo, no computational state undo required at all.

Cheers -- Sjoerd

On Apr 30, 11:53 am, Barak Shoshany <bara...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This seems to be a recurring subject in this group.
>
> Mathematica is now at version 8 and there's still no multiple undo and
> redo functionality. I don't understand how such an amazing piece of
> software can lack such a trivial feature. Why isn't Woflram doing
> anything about it? Heck, I'll even write the code for undo/redo myself
> for them for free if they let me. Is there someone at Wolfram I can
> complain on the matter? Perhaps an internet petition is in order? What
> do you think?
>
> Barak

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica


csiph-web