Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #1934 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Barak Shoshany <baraksh@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-30 09:53 +0000 |
| Last post | 2011-05-03 09:46 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Undo/Redo Barak Shoshany <baraksh@gmail.com> - 2011-04-30 09:53 +0000
Re: Undo/Redo "Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 09:46 +0000
| From | Barak Shoshany <baraksh@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-30 09:53 +0000 |
| Subject | Undo/Redo |
| Message-ID | <ipgm7m$8t2$1@smc.vnet.net> |
This seems to be a recurring subject in this group. Mathematica is now at version 8 and there's still no multiple undo and redo functionality. I don't understand how such an amazing piece of software can lack such a trivial feature. Why isn't Woflram doing anything about it? Heck, I'll even write the code for undo/redo myself for them for free if they let me. Is there someone at Wolfram I can complain on the matter? Perhaps an internet petition is in order? What do you think? Barak
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-05-03 09:46 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ipoiti$g5s$1@smc.vnet.net> |
| In reply to | #1934 |
I would second the motion that the most simple multiple undo should do. Just input text undo, no computational state undo required at all. Cheers -- Sjoerd On Apr 30, 11:53 am, Barak Shoshany <bara...@gmail.com> wrote: > This seems to be a recurring subject in this group. > > Mathematica is now at version 8 and there's still no multiple undo and > redo functionality. I don't understand how such an amazing piece of > software can lack such a trivial feature. Why isn't Woflram doing > anything about it? Heck, I'll even write the code for undo/redo myself > for them for free if they let me. Is there someone at Wolfram I can > complain on the matter? Perhaps an internet petition is in order? What > do you think? > > Barak
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
csiph-web