Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #1454 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-04-04 10:30 +0000 |
| Last post | 2011-04-04 10:30 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Re: why extending numbers by zeros instead of dropping precision is a good idea Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 10:30 +0000
| From | Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-04-04 10:30 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: why extending numbers by zeros instead of dropping precision is a good idea |
| Message-ID | <inc6jd$sl$1@smc.vnet.net> |
On Mar 31, 3:06 am, Richard Fateman <fate...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > It is occasionally stated that subtracting nearly equal quantities from > each other is a bad idea and somehow unstable or results in noise. (JT > Sardus said it on 3/29/2011, for example.) > > This is not always true; in fact it may be true hardly ever. Hardly ever? What a silly assertion. This has been a major concern since the dawn of automatic numerical analysis. > > It is, for example, the essence of Newton iteration. Convergence on a fixed point is a special case. Negative feedback attenuates error (your homework today is to study how the delta-sigma method can extract 24 bit accuracy from a 1 bit digitizer). But many numerical methods lack negative feedback.
Back to top | Article view | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
csiph-web