Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #1267 > unrolled thread

OT: structure of threads

Started byPeter Pein <petsie@dordos.net>
First post2011-03-30 09:13 +0000
Last post2011-03-31 08:57 +0000
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica


Contents

  OT: structure of threads Peter Pein <petsie@dordos.net> - 2011-03-30 09:13 +0000
    Re: OT: structure of threads Yves Klett <yves.klett@googlemail.com> - 2011-03-31 08:57 +0000

#1267 — OT: structure of threads

FromPeter Pein <petsie@dordos.net>
Date2011-03-30 09:13 +0000
SubjectOT: structure of threads
Message-ID<imus6v$i38$1@smc.vnet.net>
I observe that in this - as in some other groups - it is not easy to 
follow threads though "sorting by threads" is activated in my 
Thunderbird. Often I miss a later answer to a question and it is 
embarrassing to tell an answer which has been given but not read (by me) 
because there are dozens of other unsorted topics between the OP and my 
post.

Dear members, if your newsreader has an option "reply", please use it; 
and for new topics use "new message" or whatever your client has named 
this function.

I see some answers landing in a tree structure that makes following 
threads easy. But most are sorted by date.

Thanks for making reading, answering and helping easier,
Peter

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1309

FromYves Klett <yves.klett@googlemail.com>
Date2011-03-31 08:57 +0000
Message-ID<in1fl3$49p$1@smc.vnet.net>
In reply to#1267
Hi,

I am using the Thunderbird newsreader as well and get a lot of jumbled
threads. Not entirely sure if this is not bug of the news reader,
because on google groups the threads appear more orderly.

Regards,
Yves

Am 30.03.2011 11:13, schrieb Peter Pein:
> I observe that in this - as in some other groups - it is not easy to 
> follow threads though "sorting by threads" is activated in my 
> Thunderbird. Often I miss a later answer to a question and it is 
> embarrassing to tell an answer which has been given but not read (by me) 
> because there are dozens of other unsorted topics between the OP and my 
> post.
> 
> Dear members, if your newsreader has an option "reply", please use it; 
> and for new topics use "new message" or whatever your client has named 
> this function.
> 
> I see some answers landing in a tree structure that makes following 
> threads easy. But most are sorted by date.
> 
> Thanks for making reading, answering and helping easier,
> Peter
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica


csiph-web