Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #3481
| From | "Kevin J. McCann" <kjm@KevinMcCann.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? |
| Date | 2011-07-04 11:18 +0000 |
| Organization | Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <ius7hm$358$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ius5op$2g7$1@smc.vnet.net> |
BTW, you can skip the outer N[]: N[2,20]N[Sqrt[2],20] produces: 2.8284271247461900976 Kevin On 7/4/2011 6:47 AM, slawek wrote: > Let Mathematica (6.x, 7.x) compute quite a simple product > > In[1]:= N[N[2.0, 20] * N[Sqrt[2] , 20], 20] > > Out[1]= 2.82843 > > This is a bug. > > Why? > > Now we analyze it in details: > > 1. N[2.0,20] should give 2 with accuracy/precision/whatsever about 20 > decimal digits, i.e. 2.00000000000000000000 > > 2. Sqrt[2] should give... Sqrt[2] > > 3. N[Sqrt[2]] should give 1.4142135623730950488 (this is copy-paste from > Mathematica output to N[Sqrt[2]] ) > > 4. The product 2.00000000000000000000 * 1.4142135623730950488 is > 2.8284271247461900976 (again copy-paste) > > 5. BUT THE RESULT OF N[2.0, 20] * N[Sqrt[2] , 20] "truncated to 20 digits" > is Out[1]= 2.82843 > > Where are missing digits?! > > slawek > > > >
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "slawek" <slawek@host.pl> - 2011-07-04 10:47 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "Kevin J. McCann" <kjm@KevinMcCann.com> - 2011-07-04 11:14 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "slawek" <slawek@host.pl> - 2011-07-05 09:17 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "Kevin J. McCann" <Kevin.McCann@umbc.edu> - 2011-07-06 09:35 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "slawek" <slawek@host.pl> - 2011-07-07 11:40 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Daniel Lichtblau <danl@wolfram.com> - 2011-07-07 11:34 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "Oleksandr Rasputinov" <oleksandr_rasputinov@hmamail.com> - 2011-07-06 09:39 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-07 11:33 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> - 2011-07-08 08:51 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "slawek" <slawek@host.pl> - 2011-07-12 11:01 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "Oleksandr Rasputinov" <oleksandr_rasputinov@hmamail.com> - 2011-07-08 09:04 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-09 11:34 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "slawek" <slawek@host.pl> - 2011-07-12 11:02 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "Oleksandr Rasputinov" <oleksandr_rasputinov@hmamail.com> - 2011-07-09 11:37 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 07:11 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-14 09:23 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-15 01:19 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "W. Craig Carter" <ccarter@mit.edu> - 2011-07-15 01:25 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-15 08:12 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-16 09:45 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-16 09:40 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> - 2011-07-13 07:12 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> - 2011-07-15 01:23 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-15 08:10 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Noqsi <noqsiaerospace@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 09:41 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-17 10:02 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "slawek" <slawek@host.pl> - 2011-07-18 10:14 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl> - 2011-07-18 10:17 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-19 10:55 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "Kevin J. McCann" <kjm@KevinMcCann.com> - 2011-07-04 11:18 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-05 09:15 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? "slawek" <slawek@host.pl> - 2011-07-06 09:34 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Daniel Lichtblau <danl@wolfram.com> - 2011-07-07 11:35 +0000
Re: Numerical accuracy/precision - this is a bug or a feature? Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu> - 2011-07-08 08:53 +0000
csiph-web