Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #2931

Re: Portfolio Optimization

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Priyan,

You don't need to do numerical optimization because there is an exact analytical solution.  Let me know if you'd like the script.

Gregory


> Hi!
> 
> I am trying to run a portfolio optimizer in Mathematica. That is, minimising
> the variance of a portfolio of assets.
> 
> (* Variance Covariance Matrix *)
> Covariants = {{0.000572843, 0.000223023, 0.000109176}, {0.000223023,
>    0.000387437, 0.0000987402}, {0.000109176, 0.0000987402,
>    0.007320276}}
> 
> (* Asset Weights Vector*)
> weights = Transpose[{{w1}, {w2}, {w3}}]
> 
> (* Optimize Portfolio Variance*)
> NMinimize[{weights.Covariants.Transpose[weights],
>   w1 + w2 + w3 == 1}, {w1, w2, w3}]
> 
> The output Mathematica throws is as follows:
> *NMinimize::nnum: "The function value {{0.00408844}} is not a number at
> {w1,w2,w3} = {-0.63531,0.918621,0.716689}. "*
> 
> However if I program the same optimization in Excel (using Solver to find
> optimal weights) I see the weights should be {0.309102831, 0.659653054,
> 0.031244115} as this gives a lower portoflio variance of 0.0003276.
> 
> Does anyone know why Mathematica is giving me the wrong answer? And, why is
> it saying the funcion value is not a number?
> 
> Thanks for your all your comments,
> Priyan.

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Portfolio Optimization Gregory Lypny <gregory.lypny@videotron.ca> - 2011-06-04 10:20 +0000

csiph-web