Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #2561
| From | Ray Koopman <koopman@sfu.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: formation of lowering operator and raising operator |
| Date | 2011-05-21 10:47 +0000 |
| Organization | Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <ir8584$beq$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ir2vj9$gsd$1@smc.vnet.net> |
On May 19, 4:40 am, tarun dutta <tarundut...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i have a basis like" ket={0,1,2,3}"
> define lowering operator as "Ai "where i can vary from 0 to 4
In general, 0 <= i <= Length@ket ?
> I need to operate it on the ''ket' such as
> A3{0,1,2,3} will give the result as Sqrt[2]{0,1,1,3} ,here i=3;
That decremented the value in position i.
>
> similarly, A2{0,1,2,3} will give result as Sqrt[1]{0,0,2,3} here i=2
That, too, decremented the value in position i.
>
> In general Ai{0,1,2,....i,,,,3,,,}===sqrt[i]{0,1,2,...i-1,...3...}
But that decremented the value in position i+1.
Which position should be decremented, i or i+1 ?
If it's i+1 then what should happen when i = Length@ket ?
>
> one constraint if A0{0,1,2,3} will give==Sqrt[0]{0,1,2,3}
> since number can not be negative within the basis..
>
> In the same way if raising operator Bi operate on {0,1,2,3}
> as Bi{0,1,...i....,2,3} will give sqrt[ i+1]{0,1,2.....i+1,...2,3}
That incremented the value in position i+1.
Does i in Bi refer to the same position that i in Ai does?
What should B0 give?
>
> how will i construct it in mathematica?
> any help will be much appreciated..
> regards,
> tarun dutta
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
formation of lowering operator and raising operator tarun dutta <tarunduttaz@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 11:40 +0000 Re: formation of lowering operator and raising operator Peter Breitfeld <phbrf@t-online.de> - 2011-05-20 10:34 +0000 Re: formation of lowering operator and raising operator Ray Koopman <koopman@sfu.ca> - 2011-05-21 10:47 +0000
csiph-web