Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #1500
| From | Eric Brown <eric.c.brown@mac.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica |
| Subject | Re: ProgressIndicator and ParallelTable problem :( |
| Date | 2011-04-06 09:13 +0000 |
| Organization | Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <inhasb$2ad$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink) |
I used to be bothered by this, until I reasoned that it's not a well-defined task. Say there are ten tasks that need to be processed in a ParallelTable, and I have a quad-processor. Also, consider that each task might take a different amount of time. So, things start off fine, Task 1 is on Processor 1, Task 2 is on Processor 2, etc. 1 -> 1 2 -> 2 3 -> 3 4 -> 4 So what is the index for ProgressIndicator? I would say 4, but 1 would be just as valid. Now let 2,3, and 4 finish sooner than 1. Now, 1->1 5->2 6->3 7->4 So what is the index for ProgressIndicator? 7 or 1? I totally see what you want to do. I ended up cutting the problem into batches and monitoring progress on those instead. Eric
Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: ProgressIndicator and ParallelTable problem :( Eric Brown <eric.c.brown@mac.com> - 2011-04-06 09:13 +0000 Re: ProgressIndicator and ParallelTable problem :( psycho_dad <s.nesseris@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 12:06 +0000
csiph-web