Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica > #1491

package construction

From Jack L Goldberg 1 <jackgold@umich.edu>
Newsgroups comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica
Subject package construction
Date 2011-04-05 10:45 +0000
Organization Steven M. Christensen and Associates, Inc and MathTensor, Inc.
Message-ID <inerrp$jae$1@smc.vnet.net> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Folks;

Something puzzles me. (Actually, a lot puzzles me but thats a story  
for my psychologist).  Considering the incredible sophistication of  
Mathematica, why is it so mysteriously hard for a beginner to write a package  
and store it properly so that it can by accessed as easily as built-n  
packages?

Has anyone put there mind to develop a template to make this stuff  
automatic. As a model, consider digital cameras, which have automatic  
mode for camera dummies like me, and a manual mode for the serious  
enthusiasts.  I envisage a template in which the pertinent questions  
are asked of the developer: Name of package, name of commands for  
users and the syntax of these commands, the private code and etc. Mathematica  
then takes this info, does all the routine stuff needed to have a  
package ready to go.

I suppose that this has not been done because it is far harder to do  
than I imagine it to be. But when I consider the sophistication of  
Resolve, I can't believe this is harder.

Jack

Back to comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

package construction Jack L Goldberg 1 <jackgold@umich.edu> - 2011-04-05 10:45 +0000
  Re: package construction "Sjoerd C. de Vries" <sjoerd.c.devries@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 09:12 +0000
    Re: package construction Alexey <lehin.p@gmail.com> - 2011-04-07 12:06 +0000
  Re: package construction "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-04-06 09:14 +0000

csiph-web