Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15706 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16955) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
Read again: I am an inventor of many software algorithms.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-17 23:02 -0400
 
I am an inventor of many software algorithms.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-17 22:59 -0400
 
Dr Kai-Fu Lee - The Future of Artificial Intelligence Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-17 22:00 -0400
 
My new algorithms of Scalable RWLocks using scalable counting networks version 4.1 are here Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-17 20:49 -0400
 
Scalable RWLocks version 4.1 are here.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-17 16:31 -0400
 
C CUDA Programming [Error: cudaErrorInvalidValue] Rohit Gavval <gavvalrohit21@gmail.com> 2017-10-17 08:29 -0700
 
My ThreadpoolX was updated.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-16 17:06 -0400
 
ThreadpoolX for Linux is here... Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-14 15:57 -0400
 
Scalable counting networks for Delphi and FreePascal.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-13 19:59 -0400
 
ThreadpoolX that scales very well is here.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-13 18:38 -0400
 
CPU Virtualization / CPU state Ilias Abrams <iliasabrams@gmail.com> 2017-10-12 15:50 -0700
 
Prof. Nick Bostrom - Artificial Intelligence Will be The Greatest Revolution in History Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-08 19:52 -0400
 
My scalable Threadpool is coming soon.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-08 18:39 -0400
 
Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? (12 replies — unroll) Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2017-09-26 22:42 +0300
   → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2017-09-30 03:50 -0700
     → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2017-10-01 03:37 +0700
       → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> 2017-10-01 13:32 -0700
         → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2017-10-02 00:26 +0300
           → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> 2017-10-02 09:23 -0700
             → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2017-10-03 05:50 +0700
           → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2017-10-06 03:46 +0100
   → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> 2017-10-05 05:05 +0200
     → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> 2017-10-06 02:31 +0700
       → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> 2017-10-07 18:42 +0200
   → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Leo <chris@chris-macleod.ca> 2017-10-05 08:43 -0400
     → Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2017-10-05 15:06 -0700
 
My second next software project is coming.. Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-06 17:30 -0400
 
Innovative control system paves the way for large scale universal quantum computing (4 replies — unroll) Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-01 15:02 -0400
   → Innovative control system paves the way for large scale universal quantum computing Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> 2017-10-01 13:35 -0700
     → Re: Innovative control system paves the way for large scale universal quantum computing Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-01 16:45 -0400
       → Re: Innovative control system paves the way for large scale universal quantum computing Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2017-10-06 09:02 +0100
         → Re: Innovative control system paves the way for large scale universal quantum computing fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2017-10-06 04:28 -0700
 
Here is the freewares of Paragon software Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-05 16:06 -0400
 
Paragon NTFS&HFS+ for Linux® 9.4 Express Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-05 15:21 -0400
 
Here is a good scientific news Intelli2 <intelli2@mama.com> 2017-10-05 10:47 -0400
 
Is Adjust allowed on assignment of to a class-wide argument? (1 reply — unroll) Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2017-09-29 19:40 +0300
   → Re: Is Adjust allowed on assignment of to a class-wide argument? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2017-09-29 19:41 +0300

← Newer ~Page 169 of ~300 (articles 8070–8105) Older →


csiph-web