Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #8078

Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)?

Newsgroups comp.programming
Date 2017-10-02 09:23 -0700
References <oqeaja$171f$1@gioia.aioe.org> <1fb9b885-0fae-4f0e-ab56-c49fa918b5d5@googlegroups.com> <myentrqcr7wd$.1wwvhcjgl4jff$.dlg@40tude.net> <df29ab79-7149-4cd2-a03d-75196247b04d@googlegroups.com> <oqrmh7$sd2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Message-ID <51c90cef-fa48-445b-a183-e436049c4b0e@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)?
From Chad <cdalten@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sunday, October 1, 2017 at 2:26:06 PM UTC-7, Victor Porton wrote:
> Chad wrote:
> 
> > I was always under the impression that GitHub and SourceForge were meant
> > for different things. So in other words, it is like comparing apple to
> > oranges.
> 
> Please elaborate. What is the difference of their purposes?
> 

I'm speaking from very very limited experience...

SourceForge seems to be for collaborative projects. GitHub is meant for "real time" changes. I don't know the correct term. For example, at my job, the only way to deploy a piece of software to the cloud is via GitHub.

And in some cases, what I've seen are people that can make patches to the code on the spot without having to recompile anything. After that, those changes get reflected right away on the client side but not on the server side. And these changes get controlled via GitHub. 

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2017-09-26 22:42 +0300
  Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2017-09-30 03:50 -0700
    Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2017-10-01 03:37 +0700
      Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2017-10-01 13:32 -0700
        Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> - 2017-10-02 00:26 +0300
          Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2017-10-02 09:23 -0700
            Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2017-10-03 05:50 +0700
          Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-10-06 03:46 +0100
  Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2017-10-05 05:05 +0200
    Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2017-10-06 02:31 +0700
      Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@gmail.com> - 2017-10-07 18:42 +0200
  Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Leo <chris@chris-macleod.ca> - 2017-10-05 08:43 -0400
    Re: Why GitHub (not SourceForge)? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2017-10-05 15:06 -0700

csiph-web