Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming

comp.programming

15696 articles, 3351 threads (numbers 150 – 16945) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
[SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don’t come out well (47 replies — unroll) "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-11 00:32 +0800
   → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jason <jason_warren@ieee.DELETE.org> 2017-03-16 07:33 -0400
     → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-16 20:18 +0800
       → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> 2017-03-16 09:03 -0400
         → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-16 22:06 +0800
           → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> 2017-03-16 10:59 -0400
             → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-17 00:59 +0800
           → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> 2017-03-16 12:41 -0400
             → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-17 01:00 +0800
               → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-17 04:15 -0500
                 → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-17 21:53 +0800
                 → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-17 16:18 -0500
                 → Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-18 23:16 +0800
                 → Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-18 11:37 -0500
                 → Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-19 19:07 +0800
                 → Re: So no human could make a truly secured operating system? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-19 07:53 -0500
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-20 18:35 +0800
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-21 03:58 -0500
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> 2017-03-21 09:17 -0300
                 → Re: [OT] Who's really crazy? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-21 22:12 +0800
                 → Re: [OT] Who's really crazy? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
                 → Re: [OT] Are we in war? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 19:54 +0800
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 2017-03-21 08:12 -0700
                 → write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> 2017-03-21 12:09 -0400
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2017-03-21 16:33 +0000
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "James R. Kuyper" <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2017-03-21 13:21 -0400
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) 2017-03-21 17:25 +0000
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> 2017-03-21 14:19 -0400
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> 2017-03-21 14:18 -0400
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2017-03-21 19:26 +0000
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 03:48 -0500
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2017-03-22 10:44 +0100
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 20:11 -0500
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 19:56 +0800
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 20:11 -0500
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-28 02:13 +0800
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 22:25 +0800
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? Ken Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> 2017-03-22 11:30 -0400
                 → Re: [OT]write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 23:56 +0800
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> 2017-03-21 08:52 -0400
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-21 22:08 +0800
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 03:49 -0500
                 → Re: write your own operating system single-handed? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 19:57 +0800
             → Re: 33 years to write Windows 10? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-17 01:04 +0800
           → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl 2017-03-17 13:58 +0000
             → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-18 00:43 +0800
               → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> 2017-03-17 16:17 -0500
                 → Re: [SCMP] CIA grades anti-virus programmes; some don?t come out well "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> 2017-03-18 23:07 +0800
 
About my Diploma.. aminer68@gmail.com 2017-03-26 12:08 -0700
 
About my Diploma.. aminer68@gmail.com 2017-03-26 12:02 -0700
 
THE DIABETES DRUG THAT COULD BE AN ANTI-AGING MIRACLE aminer68@gmail.com 2017-03-25 16:05 -0700
 
Data storage goes from $1M to 2 cents per gigabyte aminer68@gmail.com 2017-03-25 12:43 -0700
 
Parallel Archiver and Parallel Compression Library were updated Ramine <toto1@toto1.net> 2017-03-25 15:08 -0400
 
Please download again my library (1 reply — unroll) aminer68@gmail.com 2017-03-24 12:11 -0700
   → Re: Please download again my library aminer68@gmail.com 2017-03-24 12:16 -0700
 
Plese download again my library aminer68@gmail.com 2017-03-24 12:11 -0700
 
My C++ synchronization objects library was updated.. (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <toto1@toto1.net> 2017-03-24 10:23 -0400
   → Re: My C++ synchronization objects library was updated.. Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> 2017-03-24 14:32 +0000
 
My Scalable Parallel C++ Conjugate Gradient Linear System Solver Library was updated to version 1.62 Ramine <toto1@toto1.net> 2017-03-24 10:29 -0400
 
on solving recurrences (7 replies — unroll) Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> 2017-03-21 16:13 -0300
   → Re: on solving recurrences Ed Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> 2017-03-22 06:35 -0700
     → Re: on solving recurrences Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> 2017-03-23 19:06 -0300
       → Re: on solving recurrences Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> 2017-03-23 19:16 -0300
         → Re: on solving recurrences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2017-03-24 09:53 +0100
   → Re: on solving recurrences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2017-03-22 14:58 +0100
     → Re: on solving recurrences Daniel Bastos <dbastos@toledo.com> 2017-03-23 19:11 -0300
       → Re: on solving recurrences David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2017-03-24 09:48 +0100
 
So stay tuned ! (1 reply — unroll) Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-19 14:56 -0400
   → Re: So stay tuned ! Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-19 15:03 -0400
 
My question about FreePascal... Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-19 14:33 -0400
 
I have just read this about the C++11 Memory Model Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-18 22:44 -0400
 
About C++ and Object Pascal.. (2 replies — unroll) Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-17 18:44 -0400
   → Re: About C++ and Object Pascal.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-17 18:52 -0400
   → Re: About C++ and Object Pascal.. Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru> 2017-03-19 01:06 +0200
 
troubles when coding roguelike (1 reply — unroll) fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2017-03-18 03:24 -0700
   → Re: troubles when coding roguelike fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> 2017-03-18 03:46 -0700
 
Here is how to understand C++ compilers.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-17 19:56 -0400
 
Read again about C++ Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-17 19:37 -0400
 
C++ compilers today follow a weak memory model Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-17 19:34 -0400
 
Another deficiency of C++ compilers.. Ramine <toto@toto.net> 2017-03-17 19:12 -0400

← Newer ~Page 178 of ~300 (articles 7572–7646) Older →


csiph-web