Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #9211 > unrolled thread

Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots?

Started by"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
First post2018-09-10 13:32 +0800
Last post2018-09-11 01:21 +0800
Articles 5 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

Contents

  Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 13:32 +0800
    Re: Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots? Jenny Telia <jny.telia@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 07:50 +0200
      Re: What is not a robot? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-09-10 18:56 +0800
      Re: Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2018-09-10 09:38 -0300
        Re: Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2018-09-11 01:21 +0800

#9211 — Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots?

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-10 13:32 +0800
SubjectAre self-driving cars also a kind of robots?
Message-ID<pn4vlv$bti$2@toylet.eternal-september.org>
Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots?

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#9212

FromJenny Telia <jny.telia@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-10 07:50 +0200
Message-ID<pn50n8$gl6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#9211
On 10/09/2018 07:32, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> 
> Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots?
> 

Yes, just like self-posting morons from Hong Kong. They are both 'a kind
of robot'. (Self-driving cars are marginally more intelligent, and
vastly more useful.)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9213 — Re: What is not a robot?

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-10 18:56 +0800
SubjectRe: What is not a robot?
Message-ID<pn5il3$otm$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#9212
On 9/10/2018 1:50 PM, Jenny Telia wrote:
> On 10/09/2018 07:32, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>
>> Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots?
>>
> 
> Yes, just like self-posting morons from Hong Kong. They are both 'a kind
> of robot'. (Self-driving cars are marginally more intelligent, and
> vastly more useful.)
> 

Excellent observation!

Maybe all living organism are just biological robots! :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9215

FromShadow <Sh@dow.br>
Date2018-09-10 09:38 -0300
Message-ID<oapcpdt63lmlcrq47tfmv62q6nm2u9ebjl@4ax.com>
In reply to#9212
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:50:30 +0200, Jenny Telia <jny.telia@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On 10/09/2018 07:32, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>> 
>> Are self-driving cars also a kind of robots?
>> 
>
>Yes, just like self-posting morons from Hong Kong. They are both 'a kind
>of robot'. (Self-driving cars are marginally more intelligent, and
>vastly more useful.)

	+1
	Self driving cars don't usually crash into completely off
topic places. The moron from chinkilinky does.
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9224

From"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>
Date2018-09-11 01:21 +0800
Message-ID<pn6978$jt3$1@toylet.eternal-september.org>
In reply to#9215
On 9/10/2018 8:38 PM, Shadow wrote:
> 
> 	+1
> 	Self driving cars don't usually crash into completely off
> topic places. The moron from chinkilinky does.

Are you sure about that? Human drivers are still crashing their cars in 
events called accidents.

How could A.I. programs, written by human, not err and have accidents? 
Do you wanna write the programs yourself? Can you promise if not 
guarantee its quality? ;)

Anyway, an interesting analogy you made! ;)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不賭錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 
(CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming

csiph-web