Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #7809 > unrolled thread
| Started by | rami18 <coco@coco.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-05-31 14:38 -0400 |
| Last post | 2017-05-31 14:38 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
About Greatness.. rami18 <coco@coco.com> - 2017-05-31 14:38 -0400
| From | rami18 <coco@coco.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-31 14:38 -0400 |
| Subject | About Greatness.. |
| Message-ID | <ogn2cc$4tp$5@dont-email.me> |
Hello........... About Greatness.. Donald Trump wants America to be great again.. Neo-nazis want to be greatness too.. But this is not in accordance with Liberty or with Happiness. Because Greatness must be constrained today by optimization.. So you have to be capable of being Diplomacy.. What do you think is Diplomacy ? Do you think it is hating and hating like neo-nazis ? That's an inferior thinking.. Diplomacy must know how to be respect to higher consumer confidence index and to attract consumers and to be more security and reliability and corrrectness, so you have to know how to soften your manners of addressing others, you have to choose correct words that fulfill the above requirements.. This is the weakness also of nationalism that doesn't know how to manage correctly with efficient morality.. Because Liberty is a generalization, like a general mathematical proof, and since it is a generalization , so it is constrained by the guidance of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral, so you have to know how to manage yourself and how to manage the world. Please read also the following to know about my thoughts: About identity What is identity ? This is a really a good question.. You can say that you are a white europeans.. And you can say that i am a white arab that lives in Montreal Canada.. But that's lacking optimization.. Because i am not defined by just being a white arab.. I am also the content of a book on computer programming.. I am also a content of a book on operational research.. I am more professionalism that knows more, because i am also a computer programmer.. And i know more how to infer more efficient morality from Liberty.. And since Liberty is a generalization, like we generalize proofs in science.. So Liberty do include efficient morality, because without efficient morality , we can hurt ourselves and this can not be called Liberty.. And Liberty is efficient morality, and efficient morality is professionalism that knows better how to survive, it's professionalism that is more rationality and logic and more optimization, optimization is the back-bones of our civilization, because it's related to better surviving that is the goal of philosophy that is happiness, and since the goal of philosophy is happiness and it's a guidance of morality, this Happiness is also a generalization, so this generalization looks like the generalization that we call Liberty, Happiness and Liberty are magical words, in the sense that they include the necessary requirements of an efficient morality. But efficient morality can not ignore optimization that says says for example that respect and compassion and love higher the consumer confidence index, and the lack of respect and compassion and compassion does cause problems to the consumer confidence index, this is the basic rule also to how we must be also a decent economic investment in the third world countries , because a decent economic investment in third world countries attracts more consumers and higher the consumer confidence index, because we are an interconnected world today... So as you have noticed this is how i am inferring my identity, my identity is also defending the Statue of Liberty that say that Liberty is an efficient morality, and since i know more what is efficient morality, i am inclined to respect more my fellow americains and my fellow white europeans. Please reread also the following to understand more my thoughts: Yet about Liberty To define Liberty is like a generalization, it is like science.. We can not define Liberty by being fraternity or/and being equality That the magical word of Liberty. USA is represented with the Statue of Liberty that symbolizes Liberty. I give you an example: The neo-nazism wants to define white europeans civilization too extremelly, it's like too extreme justice of communism, but this is not optimization, because optimization has to take into account empirical moral that says that "tolerance" can become an heuristic that optimizes the economic system and the social system.. so being more tolerance over immigration as of accepting arabs immigrants as immigrants even if arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, this is the new optimization of today, so if we don't use this heuristic of "tolerance" this can not be called Liberty in USA. Please read my following to know more about Liberty that is an efficient morality , because Liberty must take into account the guidance of moral that is the goal of philosophy that is happiness and it must take into account a priori pure moral and it must take into account empirical moral to be an efficient morality. A more correct schema.. Hope you have read my previous post to understand better my thoughts.. Now i will ask you a question.. How to be more confident ? To be more confident you have to be more professionalism.. And more professionalism is constrained by rationality and logic.. So an important step is to define professionalism.. Professionalism can not be defined with the old conception.. Because professionalism of today is optimization that knows better how to survive.. We have to reject the old conception of Hitler and of the old communism because it was less optimization that lacks optimization of today.. You have to abstract the political philosophy.. Foe example when i say: Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice that's not sufficient.. Because responsability is influenced by the variable of "tolerance" and "tolerance" can become an heuristic that optimizes the system, so if we are more "tolerance" we can attract consumers and higher the consumer confidence index and we can penetrate more the economic market of others, this is inferred from empirical moral and this is the preferred way of social Liberalism that wants to play this card.. and this inform us that morality is not just saying that Justice must constrain happiness and responsability must constrain justice, because that lacks empirical moral.. and you have to know how to decompose morality to be able to understand morality, morality is also the guidance of moral, so morality must be guided by the soft way of enforcing the quality of morality, like i have explained it in my previous post, and by enforcing the hard way the laws of morality.. and morality is also a priori pure moral inferred from reason,and morality is also empirical moral, such as saying that "tolerance" over responsability and over justice can become an heuristic that optimizes and better the economic system and the social system, or like saying that "tolerance" over immigration can become an heuristic that optimizes and better the economic system and the social system. Please reread my thoughts to understand more: What is the factors that create quality ? There is among them correctness and reliablity and also efficiency.. So you have to understand what is correctness and reliability and efficiency of the system or the political philosophy.. Efficiency is not saying since jews make more money, so jews are bad. Efficiency and reliability and correctness of the system must be abstracted like when we are abstracting the software with UML and IDAR.. And your abstraction must shows the essentials.. So when you are doing political philosophy that's the same.. You have to decompose correctly and abstract correctly and be efficient in your thinking.. Like when i say: How to provoke and bring quality to the political system and the system ? If you are blind you will say that it is futility.. But when you are smart you will say that it is an important question that must be answered.. How do you think we can bring quality to morality ? Remember with me the soft way and the hard way to bring quality to morality that i have discussed previously.. Without this perception and conception you will be like a blind person.. Blindness is not good for quality. So please read my following thoughts to be able to see what i am seing.. I am a white arab... I am a computer programmer and i have a diploma in Microelectronics and informatics.. What is the most important goal of my political philosophy? In my opinion the most important aim of my political philosophy is that as I have just explained that the idea in the Platonic sense has a very important characteristic, it is that one can perfect it and bring it to be more and more perfect or even perfect, then in my opinion the aim of my political philosophy it is to perfect ideas and to make them follow by the people, not only that, but these architectural and efficient and correct ideas of my political philosophy should be regarded as automata that should be executed to arrive at there efficient goals, now a question arises from it: how to encourage the people to execute these architectural ideas as executing automata to perfect more our world ? One of the ways to do this is what I have done in my political philosophy is to show that rationality and science and microprocessors and valuable advices etc. etc. are also as time machines that permit to travel in the future , that is the architectural ideas of my political philosophy and this architectural ideas of my political philosophy leads the people to perceive the world differently by giving for example more importance and high priority to science and efficient technics and technology, the other method is also to reinforce more these architectural ideas of my politicial philosophy to be able to enhance and perfect, as we are enforcing laws.. Please reread i have corrected more my typos to understand more my political philosophy: Can we travel back in time? Here is my thoughts that i have just wrote: It is a very interesting question that demands rationality and logical thinking to answer it ... To answer it, i start from a mathematical subject which is the mathematical arithmetic series. An arithmetic series has as its main characteristic that the difference between its terms is constant ... and that its sum gives (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), a_n being the last term ... now you have to be smart and notice with me that just before the final step of the final calculation that resulted as a general equation of the arithmetic series, the calculation of the arithmetic series required of us a much bigger time to solve the series .. But as soon as the result (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2 has been reached, the time for the resolution of the arithmetic series has greatly diminished, therefore the time preceding the resolution has compressed a lot and allowed us to travel in the the future quickly, the resolution of the arithmetic series which gave: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it's like a wormhole in the universe permit us to time travel in the future more quickly, but understand with me that the time travel in the future that allows you to make the equation of (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is relative to the time taken previously by the arithmetic series just before the discovery of the equation (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), and thus that the universe is computable and that ultimately it allowed a time travel and thanks to mathematics that is something extra-ordinary in itself. Now I will be more logical and ask myself the following question: Is there any contradiction in my evidence since a car is not a machine to allow time travel in the future to the simple reason that the regions where we will travel and arrive faster with a car will not have aged in time that corresponds to the future time in which one arrives by the feet? I answer this in a more logical way: Notice that when I said that the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2) is a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future, because it is an equation that also predicts the result more quickly to which one arrives by paper without this equation, so the time has no hold on the theoretical result that is predicted faster so that there is no contradiction when it comes to theoretical prediction. Also when you use this invention That is this mathematical equation of the arithmetic series: (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), it is that you are living the future of the one who has not yet invented or used this equation and who will arrive there in its future, therefore it is for this reason that this equation is also a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future and it has a predictive characteristic. So there is no contradiction and therefore we can consider a car as a time traveling machine to travel in the future, like the microprocessor, and like several other mathematical inventions as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series. Here is one of my conclusion: If you are traveling from Montreal to Paris by airplane, and that another person swims and walk by foot to Paris, and assume that the person who moves by swiming and walking wants to see Paris and answer some questions, And if you travel to Paris by plane and you answer these questions more quickly since you are going to see Paris more quickly than the person swimming and and walking , so that has a predictive character as the mathematical equation of the arithmetic series (a_n * (a_n + 1)) / 2), since you will be able to send an email quickly to the person who wants to to swim and walk to Paris and give him the answers he's looking for, so you'll be able to see the answers of his future, and this predictive characteristic can be considered as a time travel machine that permits to travel in the future, so the aircraft and the car are like time travel machines that permit to travel in the future ... as well as the processors and other mathematical inventions and others... Rationality and logic also have a predictive characteristic, so you must also reason better in a more scientific manner and take into account the scientific and empirical evidence to be ahead of others, like a time machine that permits to travel in the future.. If a first person receives a valuable advice and this advice of value allows him to better control his future and to succeed in his life in the future by executing this valuable advice and also it allows him to predict his future, and besides, imagine that a second person will receive in its future this valuable advice, then the first person will be able to guess with CERTITUDE the future of the second person which will be the consequence of the execution of this valuable advice , and not only the first person will have lived the future of the second person before the second person, since the two will have lived the same event by the execution of this valuable advice, then in my opinion we must reason as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic and notice that since the first person will guess with CERTITUDE The future of the second person and will also live the future event of the second person, then those two theoretical and empirical evidences confirms that the first person has lived the future event of the second person, so this valuable advice could be called by mathematical approximation a time machine that permits to travel in the future, I say "approximation", because we by analogy are as in fuzzy logic rather than in boolean logic, in addition to that, that the fact that the first person guesses with CERTITUDE the future of the second person, this informs in a logical manner that this certainty change our way of perceiving, for this certainty, even if it is not travel in the future, it is by approximation as a journey into the future, for a journey into the future will lead to the same certainty, and as a result the same certainties permit us to affirm by approximation that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future. Then you understand that I am also a Platonist, Because you noticed that I can define this time travel in the future as a platonic event, so when i said that a valuable advice is a time machine that permits to travel in the future, you understand that it makes us live platonically the future of others, and since I am a also Platonist, I affirm that a valuable advice is a time travel machine that permits us to travel in the future of others since time has no hold on the ideas, and that the same idea through time inside two persons, is the same idea, therefore my proof is made that the valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future. When you imagine a circle, I asserts that not only can you imagine the circle in material or matter but also in immaterial, as was my proof that I have just given you , this immaterial essence of the idea is reified by our reason, and that is the reason that gives it existence. So this in my opinion is sufficient proof that the idea exists because we feel it by our reason and it pays homage to our beloved philosopher Plato. It is this reification of the immaterial essence of the idea by reason which gives the necessary and even sufficient approximation to call even a valuable advice a time machine that permits to travel in the future. Then since the idea exists and since a sensation also exists, then one can not also distinguish an idea from the generated sensation by the execution as an automaton of a valuable advice at a time t1 and a time t1 + t2, and since an idea does not age then we can affirm that valuable advice is a time machine that permits us to travel in the future, and the valuable advice has a predictive characteristic, because the approximation is sufficient since we are not in boolean logic but in fuzzy logic. Getting more technical that's also mean getting more efficient with rationality and logic, because i am a rational type of person.. You have to understand the game of politics.. The game of politics is not saying that jews are getting rich so jews are bad, this is the neo-nazism way of thinking.. But this thinking is inferior.. Because when you think about morality, you have to decompose morality into the guidance of morality and the a priori pure moral and empirical moral.. I have defined the guidance of morality as being the goal of philosophy that is happiness that guides also morality, this guidance is inherent to our essence. And a priori pure moral is inferred from reason and empirical moral is inferred from empirical world. So morality is not too much ideal justice as in communism using the tool of the violence of Class Struggle because of compassion that wants to reduce too much social Darwinism, this causes extremism and violence, or morality is not too extreme definition of what is white europeans civilization, as in neo-nazism, and that lacks the optimization with the heuristic of "tolerance" towards immigration that optimizes the economic system and the social system , this is an inferior thinking. You can make more money with more money, but allowing making more money is also a mechanism like an heuristic that provoke and bring more quality, this is also inferred from empirical moral, it's like the heuristic of "tolerance" that optimizes the system, we allow also to make more money to not being laziness and to be more productive and to be more efficient and to be more creativity and to be more inventivity.. so this heuristic is the base of capitalism also, this is why we can not say that capitalism is bad, but capitalism and the system is also constrained by other mechanisms like the mechanism of not neglecting compassion and respect and love to not cause violence and extremism in the system, now the interpretation of how much compassion and respect and love will not be leaved to the reader, because the degree of compassion and love and respect needed in the system must be interpreted as avoiding extremism that can causes hate and violence and desorder, so the degree of compassion and love and respect must be approximated by a political party such as social democracy or social Liberalism that knows how to be decent compassion and decent respect and decent love, the other important mechanism is "democracy" and the power of the people , this power of the people can provoke and bring quality but it's also constrained by the mechanism and the counter-power of the financial and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and this creates also a world stability because we have to optimize our economic systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance and responsable democracy, the other mechanism is also the consumer confidence index that is a power that provoke and bring quality to the system, because we have to know how to be respect and compassion and love to higher consumer confidence index locally and internationally, the other mechanism about morality is the soft way and the hard way to provoke and bring quality to morality, You have to know how to provoke and bring quality to morality of the system, there is the soft way and the hard way.. all is not laws, you have to know how to provoke and bring quality using the soft way, like i was doing in my previous post called: "What is the most important goal of my political philosophy?" and you have to know how to design and implement laws by being more efficient at inferring them from the guidance of moral and a priori pure moral and empirical moral more, this is the essence of efficiency, you have to be capable and smarter in doing it, that's a necessary requirement to survive better and that fact is the soft way that provoke and bring more quality and the hard way is to know how to enforce the necessary laws, so be smart, because it's the essence of rationality and logic. Also there is the mechanism and heuristic of "tolerance" over immigration that provoke and bring more quality, as i have said that Nationalism of Donald Trump lack the heuristic of flexibility using tolerance that get you more optimized, but social Liberalism of democrates uses the flexibility of tolerance to optimize the economic system and the social system, nationalism is like extreme justice of communism that lack tolerance and that can hurt economic system and the social system. Because I have said about morality that: Justice has to constrain happiness.. And responsability has to constrain justice.. But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance , so if we are more tolerance on responsability we can higher the consumer confidence in you and we can attract more consumers and we can penetrate more the market of others, this is the game of social Liberalism. Social Liberalism of democrates wants also to play the card of tolerance to attract consumers and to higher consumer confidence index and to be able to penetrate more the market of others and to optimize better the social system, nationalism doesn't undertand it well. And i have explained also to you about the heuristic of "tolerance" that: Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following: If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries.. About America and the world.. Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs , but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist, you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize and to not cause problems to societies. Also you have to know how to apply the division of labour and how to apply Adam Smith's specialization Theory to be more optimized.. And the other mechanism that brings quality to the system is the following: About the crispations of extremist nationalism.. The old way of thinking like nazism and communism was full of violence.. So we have to enhance ourselves to avoid those problems.. The world has changed, and we are not at the time of Hitler in 1930, the crispations of extremist nationalism was also due to a need of being more domination in the secondary sector of economy, but this model is becoming more archaic, please read why: "The economic models developed by the development economists of the 1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. " by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank. Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english, because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco my country: http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web