Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #6386 > unrolled thread

Re: My answer to fir

Started byRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
First post2016-03-16 21:58 +0000
Last post2016-03-16 21:58 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: My answer to fir Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-03-16 21:58 +0000

#6386 — Re: My answer to fir

FromRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Date2016-03-16 21:58 +0000
SubjectRe: My answer to fir
Message-ID<ncckok$pqj$1@dont-email.me>
On 16/03/16 23:13, Ramine wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> fir wrote:
>  >youre stupid spamer who spetialises in spamming and you ove me more
>  >and more money for cope'ing to hide this trash ram
>
>
> Sir, i am not spamming this newsgroup,

I would agree, but only just. Spamming is unsolicited bulk electronic 
communication, and you don't quite post enough for it to qualify as 
"bulk", although it doesn't seem to be for the want of trying.

I think fir's main reason for complaint is that you never engage in 
discussions. You just keep posting random crap, and then posting a 
follow-up every time you notice some trivial error of spelling or the 
like. If you tried engaging with people instead of preaching into the 
void all the time, you might get a more positive response.

> Thank you for your time.

You are not welcome to my time. Please stop wasting it.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming


csiph-web