Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #6151 > unrolled thread

Eight is the best

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

Contents

  Eight is the best fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 15:46 -0800
    Re: Eight is the best JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-01-01 07:33 +0700
      Re: Eight is the best fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-12-31 18:39 -0800
        Re: Eight is the best David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-01-04 10:48 +0100
          Re: Eight is the best fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 07:49 -0800
            Re: Eight is the best David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2016-01-04 23:45 +0100
              Re: Eight is the best Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2016-01-04 23:02 +0000

#6151 — Eight is the best

Hallo,

here is my implementation of addition 

2+2 = 8

thank YOu
Ram

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#6153

On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:46:05 -0800 (PST), fir wrote:
> Hallo,
> 
> here is my implementation of addition 
> 
> 2+2 = 8
> 
> thank YOu
> Ram

2 + 2 is 100.

I thought you're really are a professor.
But you're just profesor..., whatever that mean.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6155

W dniu piątek, 1 stycznia 2016 01:33:22 UTC+1 użytkownik JJ napisał:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:46:05 -0800 (PST), fir wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > 
> > here is my implementation of addition 
> > 
> > 2+2 = 8
> > 
> > thank YOu
> > Ram
> 
> 2 + 2 is 100.
> 
> I thought you're really are a professor.
> But you're just profesor..., whatever that mean.

that was a parody of a thing ram abuser is mass making here (some people might get if filered out so dont see the oryginals)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6185

On 01/01/16 03:39, fir wrote:
> W dniu piątek, 1 stycznia 2016 01:33:22 UTC+1 użytkownik JJ napisał:
>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:46:05 -0800 (PST), fir wrote:
>>> Hallo,
>>> 
>>> here is my implementation of addition
>>> 
>>> 2+2 = 8
>>> 
>>> thank YOu Ram
>> 
>> 2 + 2 is 100.
>> 
>> I thought you're really are a professor. But you're just
>> profesor..., whatever that mean.
> 
> that was a parody of a thing ram abuser is mass making here (some
> people might get if filered out so dont see the oryginals)
> 

It was quite clear that you were parodying Ramine, who is known for
making lots of badly written and incomprehensible posts, starting new
threads randomly, writing off-topic to the wrong newsgroup, and replying
only to himself as few others care about his nonsense.

But did you know there is another poster on groups like this one and
c.l.c., who has a similar reputation?  The details are slightly
different - this other poster is much less willing to try to write
correct English, and is apt to be rude and insulting to people who try
to help him, but sometimes reads other peoples posts and does not start
quite as many pointless new threads.  I would, however, say that this
other poster has written a few more interesting posts - but his
communication and social skills are at least as bad as Ramine's.

Now, any guesses as to who this mystery poster is?

My hope is that having experienced how annoying Ramine is, that the
mystery other poster will realise that he too is often annoying in the
same way - and that this insight will lead to him being more thoughtful
in his future posts.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6187

W dniu poniedziałek, 4 stycznia 2016 10:48:19 UTC+1 użytkownik David Brown napisał:
> On 01/01/16 03:39, fir wrote:
> > W dniu piątek, 1 stycznia 2016 01:33:22 UTC+1 użytkownik JJ napisał:
> >> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:46:05 -0800 (PST), fir wrote:
> >>> Hallo,
> >>> 
> >>> here is my implementation of addition
> >>> 
> >>> 2+2 = 8
> >>> 
> >>> thank YOu Ram
> >> 
> >> 2 + 2 is 100.
> >> 
> >> I thought you're really are a professor. But you're just
> >> profesor..., whatever that mean.
> > 
> > that was a parody of a thing ram abuser is mass making here (some
> > people might get if filered out so dont see the oryginals)
> > 
> 
> It was quite clear that you were parodying Ramine, who is known for
> making lots of badly written and incomprehensible posts, starting new
> threads randomly, writing off-topic to the wrong newsgroup, and replying
> only to himself as few others care about his nonsense.
> 
> But did you know there is another poster on groups like this one and
> c.l.c., who has a similar reputation?  The details are slightly
> different - this other poster is much less willing to try to write
> correct English, and is apt to be rude and insulting to people who try
> to help him, but sometimes reads other peoples posts and does not start
> quite as many pointless new threads.  I would, however, say that this
> other poster has written a few more interesting posts - but his
> communication and social skills are at least as bad as Ramine's.
> 
> Now, any guesses as to who this mystery poster is?
> 
> My hope is that having experienced how annoying Ramine is, that the
> mystery other poster will realise that he too is often annoying in the
> same way - and that this insight will lead to him being more thoughtful
> in his future posts.

weel it must be heathfield (or maybe thompson?)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6194

On 04/01/16 16:49, fir wrote:
> W dniu poniedziałek, 4 stycznia 2016 10:48:19 UTC+1 użytkownik David Brown napisał:
>> On 01/01/16 03:39, fir wrote:
>>> W dniu piątek, 1 stycznia 2016 01:33:22 UTC+1 użytkownik JJ napisał:
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 15:46:05 -0800 (PST), fir wrote:
>>>>> Hallo,
>>>>>
>>>>> here is my implementation of addition
>>>>>
>>>>> 2+2 = 8
>>>>>
>>>>> thank YOu Ram
>>>>
>>>> 2 + 2 is 100.
>>>>
>>>> I thought you're really are a professor. But you're just
>>>> profesor..., whatever that mean.
>>>
>>> that was a parody of a thing ram abuser is mass making here (some
>>> people might get if filered out so dont see the oryginals)
>>>
>>
>> It was quite clear that you were parodying Ramine, who is known for
>> making lots of badly written and incomprehensible posts, starting new
>> threads randomly, writing off-topic to the wrong newsgroup, and replying
>> only to himself as few others care about his nonsense.
>>
>> But did you know there is another poster on groups like this one and
>> c.l.c., who has a similar reputation?  The details are slightly
>> different - this other poster is much less willing to try to write
>> correct English, and is apt to be rude and insulting to people who try
>> to help him, but sometimes reads other peoples posts and does not start
>> quite as many pointless new threads.  I would, however, say that this
>> other poster has written a few more interesting posts - but his
>> communication and social skills are at least as bad as Ramine's.
>>
>> Now, any guesses as to who this mystery poster is?
>>
>> My hope is that having experienced how annoying Ramine is, that the
>> mystery other poster will realise that he too is often annoying in the
>> same way - and that this insight will lead to him being more thoughtful
>> in his future posts.
>
> weel it must be heathfield (or maybe thompson?)
>

I'm sure Richard appreciates the joke :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#6196

On 04/01/16 22:45, David Brown wrote:
> On 04/01/16 16:49, fir wrote:
>> W dniu poniedziałek, 4 stycznia 2016 10:48:19 UTC+1 użytkownik David
>> Brown napisał:
<snip>>>>
>>> But did you know there is another poster on groups like this one and
>>> c.l.c., who has a similar reputation?  The details are slightly
>>> different - this other poster is much less willing to try to write
>>> correct English, and is apt to be rude and insulting to people who try
>>> to help him, but sometimes reads other peoples posts and does not start
>>> quite as many pointless new threads.  I would, however, say that this
>>> other poster has written a few more interesting posts - but his
>>> communication and social skills are at least as bad as Ramine's.
>>>
>>> Now, any guesses as to who this mystery poster is?
>>>
>>> My hope is that having experienced how annoying Ramine is, that the
>>> mystery other poster will realise that he too is often annoying in the
>>> same way - and that this insight will lead to him being more thoughtful
>>> in his future posts.
>>
>> weel it must be heathfield (or maybe thompson?)
>>
>
> I'm sure Richard appreciates the joke :-)

The unintended irony was worth a wry smile, yes.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming

csiph-web