Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #6131 > unrolled thread

Re: About C++...

Started byRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
First post2015-12-31 19:20 +0000
Last post2015-12-31 19:20 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: About C++... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-12-31 19:20 +0000

#6131 — Re: About C++...

FromRichard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk>
Date2015-12-31 19:20 +0000
SubjectRe: About C++...
Message-ID<n63v19$vm2$1@dont-email.me>
On 31/12/15 19:12, Ramine wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> Sorry Richard Heathfiled of comp.programming,
> i can not use C++ or C for realtime safety critical systems,

If you can't even spell people's names correctly, you might want to 
consider whether your attention to detail is sufficient for you to be 
writing realtime safety-critical systems in /any/ language.

> because C++ and C have to make it both ways , the way
> of C++ and the way of Ada with its runtime checks.
>
> Sorry Richard Heathfield, because of the lack of those
> runtime checks of Ada, C++ and C have become dangerous
> and not suitable for realtime safety critical systems.

It doesn't follow. The C and C++ rules are clear and obvious, and all 
you have to do is stick to them. I'm sure the same applies to Pascal and 
Ada.

> My point is crystal clear.

Your point is without merit, and of no value that I can ascertain.

-- 
Richard Heathfield
Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line 4 vacant - apply within

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming


csiph-web