Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #4955 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-11-25 14:51 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-11-25 14:51 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
About my scalable RWLocks... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-11-25 14:51 -0800
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-25 14:51 -0800 |
| Subject | About my scalable RWLocks... |
| Message-ID | <m5315s$gio$1@dont-email.me> |
Hello, So as you have noticed i have invented my scalable RWLocks that contain also scalable RWLocks's variants that are starvation-free and livelock-free.. the Seqlock doesn't fullfil this requirement for the scenarios that contain many more writes... so i think i will not port the Seqlock that was wrote in Java to Delphi and Freepascal, cause i feel that my scalable RWLocks are really good and scalable on read mostly scenarios and they are starvation-free and livelock-free even on scenario with many more writers , so i think that my scalable RWLocks can replace even RCU cause they are really scalable on read-mostly scenarios, and my scalable RWLocks can replace Seqlock cause Seqlock can livelock and can starve on scenario with many more writers... So i will advice you to use my scalable RWLocks cause they are really good: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/scalable-rwlock Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web