Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3888 > unrolled thread
| Started by | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-10-09 17:20 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-10-09 17:20 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
About Amdahl equation aminer <aminer@toto.net> - 2013-10-09 17:20 -0700
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-10-09 17:20 -0700 |
| Subject | About Amdahl equation |
| Message-ID | <l34rs3$3hm$1@news.albasani.net> |
Hello, Please read this, they say: "Amdahl's law, also known as Amdahl's argument,[1] is used to find the maximum expected improvement to an overall system" read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amdahl%27s_law I think that's false, it's not the "maximum expected improvement to an overall system", and i have explained to you why in my previous post , what i have explained is that the Amdahl equation gives you the scalability that you will have in an IDEAL CONTENTION SCENARIO , but if you have less contention it will scale much better, and in a none contention scenario it will have a perfect scalability,so i have proved to you and explainaed to you in my previous post that the Amadhal equation doesn't give a correct picture. Hope you have understood my arguments and my ideas against the Amdahl equation. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web