Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #3501 > unrolled thread

Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2013-06-20 22:11 -0700

#3501 — Re: Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores

> "aminer"  wrote in message news:kq09he$vbk$2@dont-email.me... 

>Lockfree algorithms are good for small number of cores
>up to 16 cores , but they are not good for more cores
>than that, cause they higher the contention.

You are focusing on wrong areas. For instance,  have you ever thought 
of distributed lock/wait-free algorithms? For instance, even a distributed
rwlock based on atomic RMW cannot really even think about beating 
a RCU like system.

Calm down a little bit and ponder the thought Aminer...

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming

csiph-web