Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3077 > unrolled thread
| Started by | aminer <aminer@toto.ca> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-02-21 14:33 -0800 |
| Last post | 2013-02-21 14:33 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Parallel compression library version 2.26 aminer <aminer@toto.ca> - 2013-02-21 14:33 -0800
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-21 14:33 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Parallel compression library version 2.26 |
| Message-ID | <kg5sng$l7d$1@dont-email.me> |
Hello, I have added Parallel LZO into my Parallel compression library cause it's better than Parallel LZ on decompression speed, i have benchmarked it and it's around 20% better and both Parallel LZ and Parallel LZO are 2x faster on compresion than Parallel Gzip with zcLeve1 level compression. Why i have included Parallel LZ and Parallel LZO ? They are both very fast, faster than Parallel LZMA and Parallel Gzip and Parallel Bzip, but even that they don't compress as well as Parallel Gzip or Paralle Gzip or Parallel LZMA , with both of them you will be able to compress very fast bigger files as terabyte sized data etc. Thank's, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web