Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #3040 > unrolled thread

Re: Parallel archiver using my ParallelZlib is here...

Started byaminer <aminer@toto.ca>
First post2013-02-18 17:53 -0800
Last post2013-02-18 17:53 -0800
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Parallel archiver using my ParallelZlib is here... aminer <aminer@toto.ca> - 2013-02-18 17:53 -0800

#3040 — Re: Parallel archiver using my ParallelZlib is here...

Fromaminer <aminer@toto.ca>
Date2013-02-18 17:53 -0800
SubjectRe: Parallel archiver using my ParallelZlib is here...
Message-ID<kfubbc$vir$10@dont-email.me>
On 2/18/2013 8:56 AM, bob wrote On Friday, February 15:
 >How much faster does it operate when you go from using
 > 1 thread to using 2 threads?


My parallel archiver is using Parallel Zlib so it's  fast, so since
Parrallel Zlib is fast , the P (parallel part) of the Amdahl equation is 
much smaller than with Parallel Bzip, so since it's using a lot the 
memory and the harddisk also, it gives 2.5x speed with 4 threads on 4 
cores. And thats not so bad since we are speeding up the things 2.5x 
times, ParallelBzip is mush slower, so the P part is much bigger than with
Parallel Zlib , and it gives over 3.4x speed with Parallel Bzip.



Thank's,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming


csiph-web