Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #3040 > unrolled thread
| Started by | aminer <aminer@toto.ca> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-02-18 17:53 -0800 |
| Last post | 2013-02-18 17:53 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Parallel archiver using my ParallelZlib is here... aminer <aminer@toto.ca> - 2013-02-18 17:53 -0800
| From | aminer <aminer@toto.ca> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-02-18 17:53 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: Parallel archiver using my ParallelZlib is here... |
| Message-ID | <kfubbc$vir$10@dont-email.me> |
On 2/18/2013 8:56 AM, bob wrote On Friday, February 15: >How much faster does it operate when you go from using > 1 thread to using 2 threads? My parallel archiver is using Parallel Zlib so it's fast, so since Parrallel Zlib is fast , the P (parallel part) of the Amdahl equation is much smaller than with Parallel Bzip, so since it's using a lot the memory and the harddisk also, it gives 2.5x speed with 4 threads on 4 cores. And thats not so bad since we are speeding up the things 2.5x times, ParallelBzip is mush slower, so the P part is much bigger than with Parallel Zlib , and it gives over 3.4x speed with Parallel Bzip. Thank's, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web