Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #2648 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-12-24 17:54 -0500 |
| Last post | 2012-12-26 16:09 +0000 |
| Articles | 8 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
fortran "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-12-24 17:54 -0500
Re: fortran Sjouke Burry <s@b> - 2012-12-24 23:37 +0000
Re: fortran "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-12-24 19:01 -0500
Re: fortran Sjouke Burry <s@b> - 2012-12-25 00:38 +0000
Re: fortran "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2012-12-24 22:25 -0600
Re: fortran "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-12-25 15:07 -0500
Re: fortran reference Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> - 2012-12-24 23:52 -0800
Re: fortran rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-12-26 16:09 +0000
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-24 17:54 -0500 |
| Subject | fortran |
| Message-ID | <kbameg$2ci$1@dont-email.me> |
What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any. Bill
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sjouke Burry <s@b> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-24 23:37 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA13461FAB9FFsjoukeburrysoesterbe@213.75.12.10> |
| In reply to | #2648 |
"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote in news:kbameg$2ci$1@dont- email.me: > What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any. > > Bill > > > My crystal globe is a bit fuzzy at the moment. What is kandr2??? I dont recognize it as a legal keyword/function. Google wont show a man page for it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-24 19:01 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kbaqdl$li4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2649 |
Sjouke Burry wrote: > "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote in > news:kbameg$2ci$1@dont- email.me: > >> What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any. >> >> Bill >> >> >> > > My crystal globe is a bit fuzzy at the moment. > What is kandr2??? > I dont recognize it as a legal keyword/function. > Google wont show a man page for it. http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton/kandr2/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sjouke Burry <s@b> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-25 00:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <XnsA13410E2F22D3sjoukeburrysoesterbe@213.75.12.10> |
| In reply to | #2650 |
"Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote in news:kbaqdl$li4$1@dont- email.me: > Sjouke Burry wrote: >> "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote in >> news:kbameg$2ci$1@dont- email.me: >> >>> What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any. >>> >>> Bill >>> >>> >>> >> >> My crystal globe is a bit fuzzy at the moment. >> What is kandr2??? >> I dont recognize it as a legal keyword/function. >> Google wont show a man page for it. > > http://users.powernet.co.uk/eton/kandr2/ > > > Well, in my case I use "Microsoft Fortran Reference" and "Microsoft Fortran Environment and Tools" Both containing lots of examples and explanations. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-24 22:25 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ajso5dFu0plU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #2648 |
"Bill Cunningham" wrote: > What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any. I don't think there is one. I taught Fortran for one quarter several years ago and had a devil of a time selecting a text book for the course. I had a lot of free samples to choose from and even so I remember that I didn't like the one I ended up with. First of all there are a lot variants of Fortran. Second of all, K&R is just superb by any standard..
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-25 15:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <kbd12j$q5g$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2655 |
osmium wrote:
> "Bill Cunningham" wrote:
>
>> What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any.
>
> I don't think there is one. I taught Fortran for one quarter several
> years ago and had a devil of a time selecting a text book for the
> course. I had a lot of free samples to choose from and even so I
> remember that I didn't like the one I ended up with.
>
> First of all there are a lot variants of Fortran.
Yes I see.
Second of all, K&R
> is just superb by any standard.
Amen.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robin Vowels <robin.vowels@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-24 23:52 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: fortran reference |
| Message-ID | <7dfbcae4-5d2e-43dd-be51-137ab617ae34@d2g2000pbd.googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #2648 |
On Dec 25, 9:54 am, "Bill Cunningham" <nos...@nspam.invalid> wrote: > What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any. IMHO the best is Fortran 90 Reference, by Brainerd et al. There is a later edition, but I like that one.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-26 16:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q38md85p608i8fh9meb1ncugdelt4cmch3@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #2648 |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:54:10 -0500, "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> wrote: > What's the fortran equivalent to C's kandr2? If there is any. > >Bill > Your "kandr2" is more usually referred to as "K&R2" or simply "K&R". There is no direct Fortran equivalent. There are various Fortran standards, but I suspect those are not what you are looking for. rossum (Who used to program in FORTRAN IV) ((but preferred working in Algol-60))
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web