Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #5630 > unrolled thread

stack overflow gone to sh*t

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

Contents

  stack overflow gone to sh*t fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-17 02:10 -0700
    Re: stack overflow gone to sh*t compactcpp@gmail.com - 2015-08-17 18:23 -0700
      Re: stack overflow gone to sh*t fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-18 00:34 -0700
    Re: stack overflow gone to sh*t JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-08-20 03:19 +0700
      Re: stack overflow gone to sh*t fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-08-19 13:33 -0700
        Re: stack overflow gone to sh*t JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2015-08-20 11:57 +0700

#5630 — stack overflow gone to sh*t

dont know if someona has mentioned it
SO now i full of lamers who downwote
many good questions, gave absolutely idiotic
anti answers, also close comment questions 
as duplicate when even dont reading them
a bit -- it is all in the atmosphere of 
many official quazi-wise rules of forum usage
(more text abaut rules - where feeds a crowd of donkeys - indeed it is a pice of 
kindergarten lamas)... (many could say thats
the world not only forums)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#5633

On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:10:08 PM UTC-10, fir wrote:
> dont know if someona has mentioned it
> SO now i full of lamers who downwote
> many good questions, gave absolutely idiotic
> anti answers, also close comment questions 
> as duplicate when even dont reading them
> a bit -- it is all in the atmosphere of 
> many official quazi-wise rules of forum usage
> (more text abaut rules - where feeds a crowd of donkeys - indeed it is a pice of 
> kindergarten lamas)... (many could say thats
> the world not only forums)

I'd have to disagree, as good content still exists on SO and as a niche community that wants to stay as one, it's gonna piss people off. Yeah, they're rude but they do what they say, so...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5634

W dniu wtorek, 18 sierpnia 2015 03:23:15 UTC+2 użytkownik compa...@gmail.com napisał:
> On Sunday, August 16, 2015 at 11:10:08 PM UTC-10, fir wrote:
> > dont know if someona has mentioned it
> > SO now i full of lamers who downwote
> > many good questions, gave absolutely idiotic
> > anti answers, also close comment questions 
> > as duplicate when even dont reading them
> > a bit -- it is all in the atmosphere of 
> > many official quazi-wise rules of forum usage
> > (more text abaut rules - where feeds a crowd of donkeys - indeed it is a pice of 
> > kindergarten lamas)... (many could say thats
> > the world not only forums)
> 
> I'd have to disagree, as good content still exists on SO and as a niche community that wants to stay as one, it's gonna piss people off. Yeah, they're rude but they do what they say, so...

ye, but as a niche... there is a niche of good content and a crowd of lame idiots - if they regulate moderate this sh8T they should moderate those lame idiots not give it to be 
moderated by those lame idiots (who really 
play as an idiots there).. well its their problem.. if i get insulted this way by some moderation of such forum of idiots im stopped
mix with them, so its their fault

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5636

On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:10:05 -0700 (PDT), fir wrote:
> dont know if someona has mentioned it
> SO now i full of lamers who downwote
> many good questions, gave absolutely idiotic
> anti answers, also close comment questions 
> as duplicate when even dont reading them
> a bit -- it is all in the atmosphere of 
> many official quazi-wise rules of forum usage
> (more text abaut rules - where feeds a crowd of donkeys - indeed it is a pice of 
> kindergarten lamas)... (many could say thats
> the world not only forums)

SO is not for amateurs. Period.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5637

W dniu środa, 19 sierpnia 2015 22:19:13 UTC+2 użytkownik JJ napisał:
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 02:10:05 -0700 (PDT), fir wrote:
> > dont know if someona has mentioned it
> > SO now i full of lamers who downwote
> > many good questions, gave absolutely idiotic
> > anti answers, also close comment questions 
> > as duplicate when even dont reading them
> > a bit -- it is all in the atmosphere of 
> > many official quazi-wise rules of forum usage
> > (more text abaut rules - where feeds a crowd of donkeys - indeed it is a pice of 
> > kindergarten lamas)... (many could say thats
> > the world not only forums)
> 
> SO is not for amateurs. Period.

swo why they occupy it wit such a crowd

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#5638

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:33:54 -0700 (PDT), fir wrote:
>> 
>> SO is not for amateurs. Period.
> 
> swo why they occupy it wit such a crowd

Newbies, obviously.

SO's rules kind of backfired.
Even amateurs can gain power, eventually.
From small votes of many posts, over time.
In the end, we got low standard power users which can gradually lower the
whole site's standard.

If you can't find a good answer, either you have searched the wrong
question, or there isn't any good answer yet.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming

csiph-web