Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #4757 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-09-13 21:41 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-09-17 22:29 -0400 |
| Articles | 3 on this page of 23 — 8 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.programming
gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-13 21:41 -0400
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-14 09:14 +0200
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-14 15:31 -0400
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-14 21:38 +0200
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-14 22:05 +0100
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-15 09:40 +0200
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-15 11:51 +0100
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-15 13:49 +0100
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-15 17:16 +0200
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-09-15 22:23 +0100
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-16 10:44 +0200
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-09-16 00:18 +0000
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2014-09-15 06:18 -0500
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 14:23 -0400
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-09-15 21:08 +0200
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 19:32 -0400
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Richard Heathfield <invalid@see.sig.invalid> - 2014-09-15 21:07 +0100
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 21:48 -0400
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess Jongware <jongware@no-spam.plz> - 2014-09-15 10:57 +0200
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-15 14:06 +0100
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-15 21:50 -0400
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-09-17 09:54 +0100
Re: gcc-4.x.x and endianess "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-09-17 22:29 -0400
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-15 21:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lv850u$kgq$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #4774 |
"Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> wrote in message
news:k9-dnWgbP_BLeIvJnZ2dnUVZ8iednZ2d@bt.com...
> Bill Cunningham wrote:
>> I was wondering if anyone familiar with the gcc-4 series of GNU
>> compilers know if these compilers have any type of built in capability to
>> deal with endianess and MSB and LSB on various machines, and processors.
>
> What are you looking for over and above what:
> http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Byte-Order.html
> (htons() and friends) gives you ? htons() probably goes all the way back
> to day 1.
>
> The compiler also has builtin near equivalents like:
> __builtin_bswap32()
> which presumably are faster, but I don't know when they were added.
>
> -- chris
I know of the gnu.org page above. Unfortunately much of it is over my
head so I thought I would sk those who know more.
Bill
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-17 09:54 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <auqdne867dIA0YTJnZ2dnUVZ7qkAAAAA@bt.com> |
| In reply to | #4787 |
Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I know of the gnu.org page above. Unfortunately much of it is over my
> head so I thought I would sk those who know more.
Has this thread resolved your confusions ?
-- chris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-09-17 22:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <lvdg2a$b53$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #4791 |
"Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> wrote in message
news:auqdne867dIA0YTJnZ2dnUVZ7qkAAAAA@bt.com...
> Has this thread resolved your confusions ?
Not really. It was much talk about how bad C was. I will continue to
search though. I just need to know the compiler better and I thought someone
else might.
Bill
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | comp.programming
csiph-web