Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #154 > unrolled thread

Re: Is binary a "language"?

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Is binary a "language"? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-03-30 11:59 -0700

#154 — Re: Is binary a "language"?

Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> writes:
> Todd Carnes wrote:
> ) If you accept the definition of "language" as "a particular kind of
> ) system for encoding and decoding information", which is one of the
> ) definitions given at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language, then
> ) "binary" DOES qualify as a language.
>
> No it doesn't.  Not by itself.  You also need a system to assign
> informational meanings to the encoding.  That system is the language.
>
> In other words: You can't encode information with binary *alone*, you
> also need some kind of definition/system that tells you what the binary
> endocing *means*.

Like XML?

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming

csiph-web