Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #2093 > unrolled thread

Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

Contents

  Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-23 09:27 -0500
    Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-23 17:43 +0200
      Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2012-08-24 06:17 -0400
        Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-24 19:24 +0200
          Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-08-24 19:47 +0100
            Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Gerald Breuer <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-24 22:36 +0200
              Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2012-08-25 14:15 -0400
                Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Vincenzo Mercuri <vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it> - 2012-08-25 21:10 +0200
                  Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Toby Douglass <a@b.com> - 2012-09-10 09:43 +0200
                Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-08-26 09:11 -0700
                  Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 13:12 -0500
                    Re: Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated "aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> - 2012-08-26 13:13 -0500

#2093 — Parallelsort and parallelquicksort have been updated

Hello,

ParallelSort library and ParallelQuicksort have been updated.

I have changed them and now it's thread safe to call the sort method from 
mutiple threads.


You can download parallelsort library and parallelquicksort from:

http://pages.videotron.com/amine


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#2094

Sorry, but don't spam for every minor change of your lib.
And learn a decent language. Almost no one is interested
in Pascal-libs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2096

Gerald Breuer wrote:

> Sorry, but don't spam for every minor change of your lib.
> And learn a decent language. Almost no one is interested
> in Pascal-libs.

Pascal can do things that C cannot.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2097

Am 24.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Walter Banks:

>> Sorry, but don't spam for every minor change of your lib.
>> And learn a decent language. Almost no one is interested
>> in Pascal-libs.

> Pascal can do things that C cannot.

Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2098

"Gerald Breuer" <Gerald.Breuer@googlemail.com> wrote in message 
news:k18dbi$d79$1@speranza.aioe.org...
> Am 24.08.2012 12:17, schrieb Walter Banks:
>
>>> Sorry, but don't spam for every minor change of your lib.
>>> And learn a decent language. Almost no one is interested
>>> in Pascal-libs.
>
>> Pascal can do things that C cannot.
>
> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.

Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use flawed tools 
just because everyone else does, then let them.

-- 
Bartc  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2099

Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC:

>> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.

> Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use
> flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them.

That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the
flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like
templates.
If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them
in a language that this people use.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2102

On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:36:03 +0200, Gerald Breuer wrote:

>Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC:
>
>>> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.
>
>> Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use
>> flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them.
>
>That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the
>flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like
>templates.
>If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them
>in a language that this people use.

If he wants others to use his algorithms in Pascal, he is doing
exactly the right thing; generously, in fact.

Are you asking for a refund?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2103

On 25/08/2012 20:15, Wally W. wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:36:03 +0200, Gerald Breuer wrote:
>
>> Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC:
>>
>>>> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.
>>
>>> Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use
>>> flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them.
>>
>> That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the
>> flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like
>> templates.
>> If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them
>> in a language that this people use.
>
> If he wants others to use his algorithms in Pascal, he is doing
> exactly the right thing; generously, in fact.
>
> Are you asking for a refund?
>

I think that Gerald only meant to say one thing: "aminer, stop spamming
this newsgroup!". And I believe he's not entirely wrong in that.

-- 
Vincenzo Mercuri

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2185

In article <pP2dnVl_XJS3vqTNnZ2dnUVZ8lCdnZ2d@giganews.com>, 
vincenzo.mercuri@yahoo.it says...
> I think that Gerald only meant to say one thing: "aminer, stop 
spamming
> this newsgroup!". And I believe he's not entirely wrong in that.

Killfile?

I too dislike that many posts.  I'd be perfectly happy to see the odd 
release email, but it's far more than that and goes over my tolerance.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2113

On 8/25/2012 11:15 AM, Wally W. wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:36:03 +0200, Gerald Breuer wrote:
>
>> Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC:
>>
>>>> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.
>>
>>> Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use
>>> flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them.
>>
>> That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the
>> flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like
>> templates.
>> If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them
>> in a language that this people use.
>
> If he wants others to use his algorithms in Pascal, he is doing
> exactly the right thing; generously, in fact.

I would agree if he were posting to a Pascal newsgroup, especially if it
were one that is designated for software announcements.

I don't understand why this particular library is considered so
important and widely used that its updates need to be announced in
comp.programming.

Patricia

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2117

Patricia wrote
> I don't understand why this particular library is considered so
> important and widely used that its updates need to be announced in
> comp.programming.

Patricia, as you have noticed no one is writing any more on
this newsgroup and i think it's not so horrible to post thos few 
annoucements
here, cause as you have noticed it's just a few annoucemts and that's all.

And remember that all my parallel libraries are free,
so It's all about generousity Patricia..




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdne.






"Patricia Shanahan" <pats@acm.org> wrote in message 
news:tuKdnatIEKAi16fNnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink.com...
> On 8/25/2012 11:15 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:36:03 +0200, Gerald Breuer wrote:
>>
>>> Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC:
>>>
>>>>> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.
>>>
>>>> Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use
>>>> flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them.
>>>
>>> That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the
>>> flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like
>>> templates.
>>> If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them
>>> in a language that this people use.
>>
>> If he wants others to use his algorithms in Pascal, he is doing
>> exactly the right thing; generously, in fact.
>
> I would agree if he were posting to a Pascal newsgroup, especially if it
> were one that is designated for software announcements.
>
> I don't understand why this particular library is considered so
> important and widely used that its updates need to be announced in
> comp.programming.
>
> Patricia
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#2118

I wrote:
> Patricia, as you have noticed no one is writing any more on
> this newsgroup


I mean almost no one.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.



"aminer" <aminer@videotron.ca> wrote in message 
news:k1dleu$5o5$2@dont-email.me...
>
> Patricia wrote
>> I don't understand why this particular library is considered so
>> important and widely used that its updates need to be announced in
>> comp.programming.
>
> Patricia, as you have noticed no one is writing any more on
> this newsgroup and i think it's not so horrible to post thos few 
> annoucements
> here, cause as you have noticed it's just a few annoucemts and that's all.
>
> And remember that all my parallel libraries are free,
> so It's all about generousity Patricia..
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdne.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Patricia Shanahan" <pats@acm.org> wrote in message 
> news:tuKdnatIEKAi16fNnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@earthlink.com...
>> On 8/25/2012 11:15 AM, Wally W. wrote:
>>> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:36:03 +0200, Gerald Breuer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 24.08.2012 20:47, schrieb BartC:
>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe, but Pascal is about 1% on the TIOBE-Index.
>>>>
>>>>> Who cares? If most people want to behave like sheep and use
>>>>> flawed tools just because everyone else does, then let them.
>>>>
>>>> That's subjective what's flawed or not. And I can live f.e. with the
>>>> flaws of C++ for the countervalue of powerful language features like
>>>> templates.
>>>> If aminer wants others to use his algorithms he should provide them
>>>> in a language that this people use.
>>>
>>> If he wants others to use his algorithms in Pascal, he is doing
>>> exactly the right thing; generously, in fact.
>>
>> I would agree if he were posting to a Pascal newsgroup, especially if it
>> were one that is designated for software announcements.
>>
>> I don't understand why this particular library is considered so
>> important and widely used that its updates need to be announced in
>> comp.programming.
>>
>> Patricia
>>
>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming

csiph-web