Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #10206 > unrolled thread

Read more about Rust

Started byaminer68@gmail.com
First post2019-09-15 07:22 -0700
Last post2019-09-15 07:22 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming


Contents

  Read more about Rust aminer68@gmail.com - 2019-09-15 07:22 -0700

#10206 — Read more about Rust

Fromaminer68@gmail.com
Date2019-09-15 07:22 -0700
SubjectRead more about Rust
Message-ID<4a76c19b-ca3e-4aca-a7d1-736e311eba7e@googlegroups.com>
Hello,


Read more about Rust:


You will notice by reading the following that by taking 
a mutable referenced to a variable, you will notice that 
you can not after that read or write to the variable, and 
i think that this will lesser parallelism in scenarios that 
you have more parallelism, so it is like the Read-Write Lock pattern, 
so i think to higher parallelism in those scenarios you have to go 
to unsafe Rust and this is not good.
 
Read the following to notice it:

https://manishearth.github.io/blog/2015/05/17/the-problem-with-shared-mutability/


Also with Rust there is no deadlock detection.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming


csiph-web