Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #7345 > unrolled thread

How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies?

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

Contents

  How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 18:48 +0800
    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "David B." <DavidB@nomail.afraid.invalid> - 2017-01-30 11:45 +0000
      Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 21:21 +0800
        Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 21:23 +0800
        Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-30 14:39 +0100
          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 21:42 +0800
          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-30 13:49 +0000
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 21:58 +0800
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-30 15:34 +0100
              [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 22:41 +0800
                Re: [OT] David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-30 16:03 +0100
                  Re: [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 23:33 +0800
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2017-01-30 16:34 +0000
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:44 +0800
          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2017-01-30 09:11 -0500
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 22:18 +0800
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-01-31 02:31 +0000
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 23:09 +0800
                  Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-03 11:50 +0000
                    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 20:14 +0800
                      Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-04 11:05 +0000
                        Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 19:55 +0800
                          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-04 12:43 +0000
                            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 20:54 +0800
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-01-30 12:35 -0200
              [OT] "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 22:43 +0800
              Re: US education "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 22:48 +0800
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-30 16:01 +0100
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-01-30 10:09 -0500
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-30 16:12 +0100
                  Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-01-30 10:27 -0500
                  Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-30 15:29 +0000
                    rjh@cpax.org.uk burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-01-30 10:31 -0500
                      Re: rjh@cpax.org.uk Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-30 15:33 +0000
                        Re: rjh@cpax.org.uk burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-01-30 10:35 -0500
                    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-31 13:03 +0100
          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-01-30 09:23 -0500
            Re: What exactly is Muslim? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 22:49 +0800
              Re: What exactly is Muslim? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-01-31 02:31 +0000
                Re: What exactly is Muslim? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-31 07:53 +0000
                  Re: What exactly is Muslim? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-31 08:01 +0000
                  Re: What exactly is Muslim? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-01-31 12:24 +0000
                    Re: What exactly is Muslim? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-31 13:34 +0000
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-30 16:09 +0100
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-30 15:26 +0000
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-01-30 10:27 -0500
              Re: Do Muslim and Islamic practice incest? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 23:49 +0800
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-01-30 15:32 +0000
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-30 23:57 +0800
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-01-31 13:07 +0100
          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Kaz Kylheku <221-501-9011@kylheku.com> - 2017-01-30 16:32 +0000
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 00:35 +0800
          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-01-31 02:31 +0000
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2017-01-31 10:01 +0000
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-01-31 12:24 +0000
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2017-01-31 12:36 +0000
                  Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-03 11:50 +0000
                    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-03 12:09 +0000
                      Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-04 02:39 +0000
                        Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2017-02-04 02:47 +0000
                          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2017-02-04 11:05 +0000
                    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> - 2017-02-03 14:11 +0000
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-01-31 08:13 -0500
    How many Jew programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-30 15:25 -0600
    How many Jew programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2017-01-30 15:26 -0600
    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 04:37 -0600
      Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-01-31 23:15 +0800
        Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-02-01 04:18 -0600
          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-01 19:37 +0800
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-01 14:13 +0100
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-01 21:26 +0800
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-01 16:39 +0100
                  Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 01:04 +0800
                    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2017-02-02 11:32 +0100
                      Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 19:18 +0800
                        Re: [OT]How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-02-02 12:51 -0200
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 03:37 -0600
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-02-02 11:32 -0200
                Re: [OT]How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? Shadow <Sh@dow.br> - 2017-02-02 12:45 -0200
                  Re: [OT]How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? burfordTjustice <burfordTjustice@tues.uk> - 2017-02-02 14:57 -0500
                    Re: [OT] They are all Indians... one face, one voice? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 23:01 +0800
            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 03:37 -0600
              Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 18:25 +0800
                Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 04:56 -0600
                  Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-02 19:20 +0800
                    Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 04:18 -0600
                      Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-03 18:51 +0800
                        Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 04:01 -0600
                          Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 18:25 +0800
                            Re: How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies? "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2017-02-04 17:33 -0600

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

#7443

Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> news:o73f98$1n7$1@dont-email.me 
Sat, 04 Feb 2017 02:47:44 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote:

> On 04/02/17 02:39, Diesel wrote:
>> Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> news:o71rre$csl$1@dont-email.me
>> Fri, 03 Feb 2017 12:09:58 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If you're going to post in a programming newsgroup, you'll need to
>>> cultivate a little more precision if you want to be taken
>>> seriously.
>>
>> Heh, The saying is true. You're bound to find a smartass no matter
>> which newsgroup(s) you may post in.
> 
> Given the alternative, I'll settle for "smartass".
> 

:) Likewise. 


-- 
Sarcasm, because beating the living shit out of deserving people is 
illegal.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7432

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 11:50:56 -0000 (UTC), Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote:

>"p-0''0-h the cat (coder)" <super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid>
>news:u3119cpv7v8brqa459r923nelg8om7uhko@4ax.com Tue, 31 Jan 2017
>12:36:33 GMT in alt.comp.freeware, wrote: 
>
>> You know nothing about business period. 
>
>Have you ever set foot in this country? This is a capitalist country, 
>asshat. It's all about the $$$ and resources to get more $$$. If that 
>means getting visas and hiring foreigners to save $$$ on payroll 
>which means more $$$ for the company, they won't even bat an eye 
>before they start the visa process.

Dear boy, forgive me for lecturing someone from the home of capitalism
although I might add a small caveat to that assertion and point out most
humbly to your greatness that your forefathers were still scratching
dirt thousands even mere hundreds of years ago while the rest of the
planet was engaging in capitalistic endeavour and global trade.

Of course, your humble servants look forward to the next few years when
you teach us the art of the deal, how to eradicate the horrors of
socialism, make friends and influence people.

Don't do drugs.

Anyway, tech businesses thrive when they produce products that people
want and ones that others don't do or don't do as well. If you think you
can put a company in a position like that by waving a cheque book at the
cheapest bunch of programmers you can find then you are an idiot.

Great products are made by great people. 

Next time you look beyond Poundsaver in your high street try to consider
buying a product on merit and not on price. You may experience a flash
or something similar. Don't be afraid. That'll be enlightenment.

Sent from my iFurryUnderbelly.

-- 
p-0.0-h the cat

Internet Terrorist, Mass sock puppeteer, Agent provocateur, Gutter rat,
Devil incarnate, Linux user#666, BaStarD hacker, Resident evil, Monkey Boy,
Certifiable criminal, Spineless cowardly scum, textbook Psychopath, 
the SCOURGE, l33t p00h d3 tr0ll, p00h == lam3r, p00h == tr0ll, troll infâme, 
the OVERCAT [The BEARPAIR are dead, and we are its murderers], lowlife troll,
shyster [pending approval by STATE_TERROR], cripple, sociopath, kook, 
smug prick, smartarse, arsehole, moron, idiot, imbecile, snittish scumbag, 
liar, total ******* retard, shill, pooh-seur, scouringerer, jumped up chav,
lycanthropic schizotypal lesbian, the most complete ignoid, joker, and furball.

NewsGroups Numbrer One Terrorist

Honorary SHYSTER and FRAUD awarded for services to Haberdashery.
By Appointment to God Frank-Lin.

Signature integrity check
md5 Checksum: be0b2a8c486d83ce7db9a459b26c4896

I mark any message from »Q« the troll as stinky

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7396

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:24:55 -0000 (UTC)
Diesel <me@privacy.net> wrote:

> You clearly don't know how corporations like to do 
> things here in the USA.

nor do you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7382 — How many Jew programmers are working for Google and US tech companies?

www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7383 — How many Jew programmers are working for Google and US tech companies?

"It's permissible to discuss the power of every other group, from the
Black Muslims to the Christian Right, but the much greater power of
the Jewish Establishment is off-limits. That, in fact, is the chief
measure of its power: its ability to impose its own taboos while
tearing down the taboos of others - you might almost say its
prerogative of offending. You can read articles in Jewish-controlled
publications from the [New York] Times to Commentary blaming
Christianity for the Holocaust or accusing Pope Pius XII of
indifference to it, but don't look for articles in any major
publication that wants to stay in business examining the Jewish role
in Communism and liberalism, however temperately."

http://www.sobran.com/establishment.shtml
"The Jewish Establishment
(Reprinted from SOBRAN'S, September 1995, pages 4-5)
In the early 1930s, Walter Duranty of the New York Times was in
Moscow, covering Joe Stalin the way Joe Stalin wanted to be covered.
To maintain favor and access, he expressly denied that there was
famine in Ukraine even while millions of Ukrainian Christians were
being starved into submission. For his work Duranty won the Pulitzer
Prize for journalism.

To this day, the Times remains the most magisterial and respectable of
American newspapers.

Now imagine that a major newspaper had had a correspondent in Berlin
during roughly the same period who hobnobbed with Hitler, portrayed
him in a flattering light, and denied that Jews were being mistreated
- thereby not only concealing, but materially assisting the regime's
persecution. Would that paper's respectability have been unimpaired
several decades later?

There you have an epitome of what is lamely called 'media bias.' The
Western supporters of Stalin haven't just been excused; they have
received the halo of victimhood for the campaign, in what liberals
call the 'McCarthy era,' to get them out of the government, the
education  system, and respectable society itself.

Not only persecution of Jews but any critical mention of Jewish power
in the media and politics is roundly condemned as 'anti-Semitism.' But
there isn't even a term of opprobrium for participation in the mass
murders of Christians. Liberals still don't censure the Communist
attempt to extirpate Christianity from Soviet Russia and its empire,
and for good reason - liberals themselves, particularly Jewish
liberals, are still trying to uproot Christianity from America.

Power openly acquired, openly exercised, and openly discussed is one
thing. You may think organized labor or the Social Security lobby
abuses its power, but you don't jeopardize your career by saying so. 
The Jewish establishment, it hardly needs saying, is predominantly
secularist and systematically anti-Christian.  In fact, it is unified
far more by its hostility to Christianity than by its support of
Israel, on which it is somewhat divided. The more left-wing Jews are
faintly critical of Israel, though never questioning its 'right to
exist' - that is, its right to exist on terms forbidden to any
Christian country; that is, its right to deny rights to non-Jews.
A state that treated Jews as Israel treats gentiles would be condemned
outright as Nazi-like. But Israel is called 'democratic,' even
'pluralistic.'

Explicitly 'Jewish' organizations like the American Jewish Committee
and the Anti-Defamation League enforce a dual standard. What is
permitted to Israel is forbidden to America. This is not just
thoughtless inconsistency.  These organizations consciously support
one set of principles here - equal rights for all, ethnic neutrality,
separation of church and state - and their precise opposites in
Israel, where Jewish ancestry and religion enjoy privilege. They
'pass' as Jeffersonians when it serves their purpose, espousing rules
that win the assent of most Americans. At the same time, they are bent
on sacrificing the national interest of the United States to the
interests of Israel, under the pretense that both countries' interests
are 'identical. (There is, of course, no countervailing American lobby
in Israel.)

The single most powerful Jewish lobbying group is the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which, as its former director Thomas
Dine openly boasted, controls Congress. At a time when even Medicare
may face budget cuts, aid to Israel remains untouchable. If the
Israelis were to begin 'ethnic cleansing' against Arabs in Israel and
the occupied lands, it is inconceivable that any American political
figure would demand the kind of military strike now being urged
against the Serbs in ex-Yugoslavia. 

Jewish-owned publications like the Wall Street Journal, The New
Republic, The Atlantic Monthly, U.S. News & World Report, the New York
Post, and New York's Daily News emit relentless pro-Israel propaganda;
so do such pundits as William Safire, A.M. Rosenthal, Charles
Krauthammer, Jeane Kirkpatrick, and George Will, to name a few.
That Israel's journalistic partisans include so many gentiles - lapsed
goyim, you might say - is one more sign of the Jewish establishment's
power. So is the fact that this fact isn't mentioned in public (though
it is hardly unnoticed in private.)

So is the fear of being called 'anti-Semitic.' Nobody worries about
being called 'anti-Italian' or 'anti-French' or 'anti-Christian';
these aren't words that launch avalanches of vituperation and make
people afraid to do business with you.

It's pointless to ask what 'anti-Semitic' means. It means trouble.
It's an attack signal. The practical function of the word is not to
define or distinguish things, but to conflate them indiscriminately -
to equate the soberest criticism of Israel or Jewish power with the
murderous hatred of Jews. And it works.  Oh, how it works.
When Joe McCarthy accused people of being Communists, the charge was
relatively precise. You knew what he meant.  The accusation could be
falsified. In fact the burden of proof was on the accuser: when
McCarthy couldn't make his loose charges stick, he was ruined. (Of
course, McCarthy was hated less for his 'loose' charges than for his
accurate ones. His real offense was stigmatizing the Left.)

The opposite applies to charges of 'anti-Semitism.' The word has no
precise definition. An 'anti-Semite' may or may not hate Jews. But he
is certainly hated by Jews.  There is no penalty for making the charge
loosely; the accused has no way of falsifying the charge, since it
isn't defined.

A famous example. When Abe Rosenthal accused Pat Buchanan of
'anti-Semitism,' everyone on both sides understood the ground rules.
There was a chance that Buchanan would be ruined, even if the charge
was baseless. And there was no chance that Rosenthal would be ruined -
even if the charge was baseless.

Such are the rules. I violate them, in a way, even by spelling them
out. 'Anti- Semitism' is therefore less a charge than a curse, an
imprecation that must be uttered formulaically. Being a 'bogus
predicate,' to use Gilbert Ryle's phrase, it has no real content, no
functional equivalent in plain nouns and verbs. Its power comes from
the knowledge of its potential targets, the gentiles, that powerful
people are willing to back it up with material penalties.

In other words, journalists are as afraid of Jewish power as
politicians are. This means that public discussion is cramped and
warped by unspoken fear - a fear journalists won't acknowledge,
because it embarrasses their pretense of being fearless critics of
power. When there are incentives to accuse but no penalties for
slander, the result is predictable.

What is true of 'anti-Semitism' is also true to a lesser degree of
other bogus predicates like 'racism,' 'sexism,' and 'homophobia.'
Other minorities have seen and adopted the successful model of the
Jewish establishment. And so our public tongue has become not only
Jewish-oriented but more generally minority-oriented in its
inhibitions.

The illusion that we enjoy free speech has been fostered by the
breaking of Christian taboos, which has become not only safe but
profitable. To violate minority taboos is 'offensive' and
'insensitive'; to violate Christian taboos - many of them shared by
religious Jews - is to be 'daring' and 'irreverent.' ('Irreverence,'
of course, has become good.)

Jewry, like Gaul, may be divided into three parts, each defined by its
borders vis-vis the gentile world. There are the Orthodox, who not
only insist on borders but wear them.  They often dress in attire that
sets them apart; they are even willing to look outlandish to gentiles
in order to affirm their identity and their distinctive way of life.
At the other extreme are Jews who have no borders, who may (or may
not) assimilate and intermarry, whose politics may range from left to
right, but who in any case accept the same set of rules for everyone.
I respect both types.

But the third type presents problems. These are the Jews who maintain
their borders furtively and deal disingenuously with gentiles. Raymond
Chandler once observed of them that they want to be Jews among
themselves but resent being seen as Jews by gentiles. They want to
pursue their own distinct interests while pretending that they have no
such interests, using the charge of 'anti-Semitism' as sword and
shield. As Chandler put it, they are like a man who refuses to give
his real name and address but insists on being invited to all the best
parties.

Unfortunately, it's this third type that wields most of the power and
skews the rules for gentiles. The columnist Richard Cohen cites an old
maxim: 'Dress British, think Yiddish.'


www.tomatobubble.com  www.ihr.org   http://nationalvanguard.org  

http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com    

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7390

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:48:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>Should we panic? Should we be scared? :)

     No.

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7399

On 1/31/2017 6:37 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:48:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>>
>> Should we panic? Should we be scared? :)
>
>      No.

You sure those Muslim programmers would just walk away like Jesus when 
being denied by Mr. Trump's Executive Order? What if they.... :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7400

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 23:15:42 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 1/31/2017 6:37 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:48:41 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
>>>
>>> Should we panic? Should we be scared? :)
>>
>>      No.
>
>You sure those Muslim programmers would just walk away like Jesus when 
>being denied by Mr. Trump's Executive Order? What if they.... :)

     There is nothing for the mentally sound to fear.

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7401

On 2/1/2017 6:18 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>
>> You sure those Muslim programmers would just walk away like Jesus when
>> being denied by Mr. Trump's Executive Order? What if they.... :)
>
>      There is nothing for the mentally sound to fear.

Unlike Jesus, there are always Muslims that would be angry when being 
denied and take drastic actions, very much like ISIS! :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7402

On 01/02/17 12:37, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 2/1/2017 6:18 PM, K Wills (Shill #3) wrote:
>>>
>>> You sure those Muslim programmers would just walk away like Jesus when
>>> being denied by Mr. Trump's Executive Order? What if they.... :)
>>
>>      There is nothing for the mentally sound to fear.
> 
> Unlike Jesus, there are always Muslims that would be angry when being
> denied and take drastic actions, very much like ISIS! :)
> 

The Jesus described in the Bible was a remarkably patient, peaceful and
forgiving man (unlike almost everyone else, real or mythical, in that
book).  He only got angry occasionally, according to the stories.

"Normal" people are more likely to get angry, and a certain proportion
take drastic action.

This is totally and utterly independent of religion or lack thereof.

Really, there is nothing in any of your posts that would not make equal
sense by replacing "Muslim" with "Christian", "Italian", "Red-head", or
"Two-legged human".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7403

On 2/1/2017 9:13 PM, David Brown wrote:
> The Jesus described in the Bible was a remarkably patient, peaceful and
> forgiving man (unlike almost everyone else, real or mythical, in that
> book).  He only got angry occasionally, according to the stories.
>
> "Normal" people are more likely to get angry, and a certain proportion
> take drastic action.

True! But the focus of Mr. Trump's E.O. is Muslim countries?

BTW, how do you tell whether an Indian or Arabian is a Muslim or not? I 
have no idea. :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7404

On 01/02/17 14:26, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 2/1/2017 9:13 PM, David Brown wrote:
>> The Jesus described in the Bible was a remarkably patient, peaceful and
>> forgiving man (unlike almost everyone else, real or mythical, in that
>> book).  He only got angry occasionally, according to the stories.
>>
>> "Normal" people are more likely to get angry, and a certain proportion
>> take drastic action.
> 
> True! But the focus of Mr. Trump's E.O. is Muslim countries?
> 

So what?  Are you saying it is okay for /you/ to be a religious bigot
and make ridiculous statements and questions, just because /Trump/ is a
bigot and makes ridiculous statements?

> BTW, how do you tell whether an Indian or Arabian is a Muslim or not? I
> have no idea. :)
> 

It is entirely up to an individual to choose their religion (or lack
thereof).  How do you tell if someone is of a particular religion?  The
polite thing to do is /ask/ them - and if they don't mind telling you,
they will.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7406

On 2/1/2017 11:39 PM, David Brown wrote:
> So what?  Are you saying it is okay for /you/ to be a religious bigot
> and make ridiculous statements and questions, just because /Trump/ is a
> bigot and makes ridiculous statements?

Well, it's curiosity. :)

> It is entirely up to an individual to choose their religion (or lack
> thereof).  How do you tell if someone is of a particular religion?  The
> polite thing to do is /ask/ them - and if they don't mind telling you,
> they will.

But it seems that all religions that were related to Middle-East were 
evil by design. And we should avoid them.

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7412

On 01/02/17 18:04, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
> On 2/1/2017 11:39 PM, David Brown wrote:
>> So what?  Are you saying it is okay for /you/ to be a religious bigot
>> and make ridiculous statements and questions, just because /Trump/ is a
>> bigot and makes ridiculous statements?
> 
> Well, it's curiosity. :)
> 
>> It is entirely up to an individual to choose their religion (or lack
>> thereof).  How do you tell if someone is of a particular religion?  The
>> polite thing to do is /ask/ them - and if they don't mind telling you,
>> they will.
> 
> But it seems that all religions that were related to Middle-East were
> evil by design. And we should avoid them.
> 

All religions that I know of have their good points and bad points.  Few
religions could really be said to be "evil" - it is people that are
evil, and some of them misuse religion as an excuse or motivation for evil.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7414

On 2/2/2017 6:32 PM, David Brown wrote:
> On 01/02/17 18:04, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>>
>> But it seems that all religions that were related to Middle-East were
>> evil by design. And we should avoid them.
>
> All religions that I know of have their good points and bad points.  Few
> religions could really be said to be "evil" - it is people that are
> evil, and some of them misuse religion as an excuse or motivation for evil.

The evil or dark side alone is enough for me to avoid them. Thanks. 
*ALL* religions or doctrines are NOW dangerous. :)

-- 
   @~@   Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!!
  / v \  Simplicity is Beauty!
/( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you!
   ^ ^   (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10)  Linux 2.6.39.3
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7419 — Re: [OT]How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies?

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:49:09 -0800 (PST), Uncle Monster
<unclemon@gmail.com> wrote:

>Christians evolved into a relatively civilized lot who went on to build the modern world. 

	Ever lived in a country they're colonizing ?
	If torture, rape and murder by violence or hunger/disease is
"relatively civilized", sure.
	Christians are almost doG-like.  Surprised they aren't born
with a halo.
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7409

On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 21:26:57 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
<toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote:

>On 2/1/2017 9:13 PM, David Brown wrote:
>> The Jesus described in the Bible was a remarkably patient, peaceful and
>> forgiving man (unlike almost everyone else, real or mythical, in that
>> book).  He only got angry occasionally, according to the stories.
>>
>> "Normal" people are more likely to get angry, and a certain proportion
>> take drastic action.
>
>True! But the focus of Mr. Trump's E.O. is Muslim countries?
>
>BTW, how do you tell whether an Indian or Arabian is a Muslim or not? I 
>have no idea. :)

     You can always ask. There wouldn't be any gain in lying about
religion, so the answer you would get would likely be honest.

-- 
Shill #3. 
Strategic Writer, Psychotronic World Dominator and FEMA camp
counselor.
https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3618/5747904676_1e202191d3_b.jpg
All hail the taco! http://www.taconati.org/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7417

On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 05:06:52 -0800 (PST), Uncle Monster
<unclemon@gmail.com> wrote:

>Correction, the travel ban is for 7 countries that are hotbeds of Islamofascist terrorism. Malaysia has the largest Muslim population and there is no travel ban from there or most other countries that have a majority Muslim population. Not all Muslims are terrorists but in this century, all terrorists have been Muslims. ?(?)?
>
>[8~{} Uncle Terrorist Monster 

	Saudi Arabia is not on the ban list, and it financed some of
the most atrocious "terrorist" attacks in the last 16 years ....
	Must be a reason for that.
	[]'s
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7418 — Re: [OT]How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies?

On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 13:44:53 +0000, "p-0''0-h the cat (coder)"
<super.pooh@fluffyunderbelly.invalid> wrote:

>Yeah, but not so long ago. 'Last century' US citizens supported
>terrorism in the UK. They helped spill blood on my streets. How many of
>those terrorists were Muslim?

	All of them. If they're not Muslims, they're NOT terrorists,
they are "freedom fighters". Or "in need of medical care", like the
guy that shot up the airport.
	You really need to catch up, Pooh. You are sounding so ....
what's the expression... ah .... pre-Trump.
	[]'s

	OT -- could we discretely move this thread away, it's almost
as annoying as some others.... May Pang Chang is GONE.
-- 
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy  - Google 2012

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#7425 — Re: [OT]How many Muslim programmers are working for Google and US tech companies?

On Thu, 02 Feb 2017 12:45:53 -0200
Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

> You are sounding so ....
> what's the expression... ah ....

Brazilian!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 4 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4] 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.programming

csiph-web