Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #16873 > unrolled thread

Re: SIMD programming in pure rust

Started byJulio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
First post2026-01-08 20:39 +0100
Last post2026-03-06 19:38 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.programming

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: SIMD programming in pure rust Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2026-01-08 20:39 +0100
    Re: Re: SIMD programming in pure rust r4dnRd <r4dnRd@usenet_reborn.tui> - 2026-03-06 17:39 +0000
      Re: SIMD programming in pure rust Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> - 2026-03-06 19:38 +0100

#16873 — Re: SIMD programming in pure rust

FromJulio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Date2026-01-08 20:39 +0100
SubjectRe: SIMD programming in pure rust
Message-ID<10jp16f$1elvi$1@dont-email.me>
On 07/01/2026 21:48, r4dnRd wrote:
>> [in reply to r4dnRd <r4dnRd@usenet_reborn.tui>]
> 
>> I came across this article, this is a guy I know from some hacker events in Germany like CCC Congress etc
>> This is a way for CPU's to handle low level programming with out having to translate to ASM etc... or so I think.
>>
>> Introduction to SIMD programming in pure Rust
>>
>> https://kerkour.com/introduction-rust-simd
> 
> Thank you for this article, it is very useful as every article Silvain writes.
> 
> [...]
> 
> To access these CPU features in other languages like C you may need to write
> assembly and as usual rust saves you from that.

The mid-level C programmer just finds a suitable library.
Rust's approach on the other hand is a nice example of a
monolithic architecture and the feature bloat, which are
rather the typical outcome of the most common incompetence.

Julio

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#16877

Fromr4dnRd <r4dnRd@usenet_reborn.tui>
Date2026-03-06 17:39 +0000
Message-ID<10of3fp$3eluv$1@matrix.hispagatos.org>
In reply to#16873
> [in reply to r4dnRd <r4dnRd@usenet_reborn.tui>]

> On 07/01/2026 21:48, r4dnRd wrote:
> >> [in reply to r4dnRd <r4dnRd@usenet_reborn.tui>]
> > 
> >> I came across this article, this is a guy I know from some hacker events in Germany like CCC Congress etc
> >> This is a way for CPU's to handle low level programming with out having to translate to ASM etc... or so I think.
> >>
> >> Introduction to SIMD programming in pure Rust
> >>
> >> https://kerkour.com/introduction-rust-simd
> > 
> > Thank you for this article, it is very useful as every article Silvain writes.
> > 
> > [...]
> > 
> > To access these CPU features in other languages like C you may need to write
> > assembly and as usual rust saves you from that.
> 
> The mid-level C programmer just finds a suitable library.
> Rust's approach on the other hand is a nice example of a
> monolithic architecture and the feature bloat, which are
> rather the typical outcome of the most common incompetence.
> 
> Julio
> 

LOL The "better than you" rhetoric.

Sometimes people just write a piece of software to prove themselves
there was some ammount of understanding, to learn how things work or
for the simple pleasure of exploration. It is not always i write good
code for living or make it useful to someone else, nobody was born
taught or just sit and write their own network stack themselves ready
for production in one night (unless you have done it regularly).

The library is not to prove competence, is a document of exploration
something useful might come after that. Obviously it might not be
useful to build something with it but it is just a document you write
when exploring something.

I guess there is people who was born taught and competent :D

-- 
r4dnRd
Nevermind i he might be coding all night...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#16878

FromJulio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name>
Date2026-03-06 19:38 +0100
Message-ID<10of6uc$ellh$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#16877
On 06/03/2026 18:39, r4dnRd wrote:
>> [in reply to r4dnRd <r4dnRd@usenet_reborn.tui>]
> 
>> On 07/01/2026 21:48, r4dnRd wrote:
>>>> [in reply to r4dnRd <r4dnRd@usenet_reborn.tui>]
>>>
>>>> I came across this article, this is a guy I know from some hacker events in Germany like CCC Congress etc
>>>> This is a way for CPU's to handle low level programming with out having to translate to ASM etc... or so I think.
>>>>
>>>> Introduction to SIMD programming in pure Rust
>>>>
>>>> https://kerkour.com/introduction-rust-simd
>>>
>>> Thank you for this article, it is very useful as every article Silvain writes.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> To access these CPU features in other languages like C you may need to write
>>> assembly and as usual rust saves you from that.
>>
>> The mid-level C programmer just finds a suitable library.
>> Rust's approach on the other hand is a nice example of a
>> monolithic architecture and the feature bloat, which are
>> rather the typical outcome of the most common incompetence.
> 
> LOL The "better than you" rhetoric.

The irony being that you think you are the one who should say that.

The most common incompetence and/then the most common nonsense.

To put it charitably.

*PLONK*

-Julio

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.programming


csiph-web