Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!news.stack.nl!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming?
Date	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	Stack Usenet News Service
Lines	43
Message-ID	<slrnkee4on.k1q.willem@turtle.stack.nl> (permalink)
References	<0c585773-a835-4a59-998d-547752a955b7@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	turtle.stack.nl
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	mud.stack.nl 1357320983 36317 2001:610:1108:5010::132 (4 Jan 2013 17:36:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@stack.nl
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	slrn/0.9.9p1 (FreeBSD)
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:2735

Show key headers only | View raw

rahul.online.9@gmail.com wrote:
) We started off with 0,1... machine languages ... c .... c++ .... php ....
)
) Why dint we proceed? - A very high level language
)
) A programming language that can be written with pictures and connections, much like how our mind visualizes a program
)
) By "very high level language", I will explain with the following scenario :
)
) If a programmer wants to create a website.
)
) He drags a box "web-site". (If he wanted a console app, he would have dragged console)
)
) He needs a form.
)
) He drags an places a form. (A form with a text field, submit and reset.  And he can drag and drop other elements or delete "reset" etc)
)
) He needs a payment gateway attached to form.  
)
) So there are 2 boxes now - 1 is form and 2 is payment gateway.

<snip> (We get the drift.)

One implementation of this is Uniface.  Been around for 20 years or so I
think.  It's actually quite good for rapid development, web-based and
otherwise.  It's just a bitch to do anything that doesn't fit in the mold.

There are dozens of other languages like that.

) Why has this kind of system not developed yet?

It has been, look above.  It's just that it has little makret share.

) Is it because this requires a lot of work?
) Or is there something very wrong with this kind of system?

SaSW, Willem
-- 
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
            made in the above text. For all I know I might be
            drugged or something..
            No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT

Thread

What is wrong in an even higher level programming? rahul.online.9@gmail.com - 2013-01-03 16:26 -0800
  Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-04 06:22 +0100
    Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? x <x@x.x> - 2013-01-04 08:53 +0100
    Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? rahul.online.9@gmail.com - 2013-01-04 02:57 -0800
      Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2013-01-04 18:13 +0100
    Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-01-04 12:04 +0000
  Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? rahul.online.9@gmail.com - 2013-01-04 02:15 -0800
  Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? Willem <willem@turtle.stack.nl> - 2013-01-04 17:36 +0000
  Re: What is wrong in an even higher level programming? rahul.online.9@gmail.com - 2013-01-06 11:24 -0800

csiph-web