Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.programming > #1694
| From | Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.programming |
| Subject | Re: Marzullo's Algorithm |
| Date | 2012-06-01 15:38 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrn3vfsjshoet.3tb.ike@iceland.freeshell.org> (permalink) |
| References | <5ff73423-5932-4e1b-9a22-7bef7b09e04d@googlegroups.com> |
On 2012-06-01, bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> wrote: > Let's say I have one computer that is synchronized to an atomic clock. > > Then I have, say 5 other computers, that need the correct time and > will attempt to get it by talking to the timekeeper computer. Those > 5 computers are all connected to the timekeeper by Wifi, so there can > be a bit of latency (although the latency tends to vary). > > What is the best way to get the 5 computers synced to the timekeeper? Have you looked at NTP (http://www.ntp.org) ?
Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Marzullo's Algorithm bob <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-06-01 08:25 -0700
Re: Marzullo's Algorithm Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-06-01 15:38 +0000
Re: Marzullo's Algorithm Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2012-06-01 10:58 -0500
Re: Marzullo's Algorithm "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2012-06-01 18:29 +0200
csiph-web