About Parallel For..

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.programming
Subject	About Parallel For..
Date	Wed, 10 Oct 2018 15:14:57 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	22
Message-ID	<ppltl1$tl3$5@dont-email.me> (permalink)
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Wed, 10 Oct 2018 22:14:57 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5166d391c4de4b9e0439a2f9dda30010"; logging-data="30371"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ii1UOl8WX6KD6wDI3mupX0JnKeMd68Qs="
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1
Cancel-Lock	sha1:f9gdMZb/G925u21Pco0HxFdM+bc=
Content-Language	en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host	news://news.eternal-september.org:119
Xref	csiph.com comp.programming:9311

Show key headers only | View raw

Hello,

Read this:

About Parallel For..

I have just read the following webpage about the implementation of 
Parallel For, here it is:

PARALLEL PROGRAMMING IN DELPHI PART I. PARALLEL FOR

https://vitaliburkov.wordpress.com/2011/10/15/parallel-programming-in-delphi/

And i think that Parallel For that is implemented in a library is not 
efficient, because i think that Parallel For has to be implemented in
a sophisticated manner by the compiler, but i think that sophisticated 
automatic parallelization by compilers has failed, so i think that i 
will not implement a Parallel For.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

About Parallel For.. Horizon68 <horizon@horizon.com> - 2018-10-10 15:14 -0700

csiph-web