Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.programming > #8808

More precision, read again..

From Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com>
Newsgroups comp.programming
Subject More precision, read again..
Date 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <pdpiod$muf$4@dont-email.me> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Hello...

More precision, read again..

I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and 
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned , 
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch 
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this 
exception of ERangeError etc.

But C++ and C don't have range checking, so that's not good in C++ and C
because it is not good for safety-critical systems.

You can carefully read the following, it is very important:

https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

More precision, read again.. Sky89 <Sky89@sky68.com> - 2018-05-19 12:18 -0400

csiph-web