Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.programming > #13961

Re: Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about can we trust the smartests in how they measure what is beauty and Love..

Followups directed to: alt.usenet.kooks

Show all headers | View raw

On 2021-10-02, Amine Moulay Ramdane <aminer68@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about can we trust the
> smartests in how they measure what is beauty and Love..
>
> I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
> invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
>
> There is still a philosophical question of:
>
> Can we trust the smartests among us in how they measure what is beauty and
> Love ?
>
>
> More precision of my philosophy of what is beauty and more..
>
> Here is more precision of my definition of what is beauty, read it again:
>
> I think i am smart, and i think i can define beauty with my fluid
> intelligence as the following:
>
> More of my philosophy about universal Love and beauty..
>
> I think i am smart, and i think i am a wise type of person,
>
> Now i can ask the following philosophical questions:
>
> Does Love is subjective ?
>
> Does Beauty is subjective ?
>
> Here is my answer:
>
> proverb:
>
> Here is my new proverb:
>
>
> More of my philosophy about civilization and specialization of our today
> world..
>
> Here is my new proverb:
>
>
> I think i am smart and here is my new proverb:
>
> "The most important disadvantage of education today, it is that we are
> learning the students, but we are neglecting to efficiently learn to students
> how to learn."
>
> This is one of the basis of my philosophy below, and read about it in my
> following thoughts:
>
> I think i am smart, and i think you can be more confident with me, since i
> think i am not too specialized(Since you have to read my below proverb about
>
> You can read more about my education and my way of doing here:
>
> More of my philosophy about why morality is universal..
>
> I think i am a smart philosopher, and i will now explain why morality is
> universal:
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the superhuman of the philosopher Friedrich
> Nietzsche..
>

Nietzcßhe cracked... he was not *superhuman*....


>
> "It is the will to power that must be expressed, not the morals of the slaves
> or the weak."
>
> That means in french:
>
> "C'est la volonté de puissance qui doit s'exprimer, non pas la morale des
> esclaves ou des faibles.",
>
>
> More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and more..
>
> I have just looked at the following video about:
>
>
> I invite you to read this very interesting article about philosophy:
>
>
> And notice that it says the following:
>
> “The Stoics suggest that what’s most important in order to lead a good life
> is internal rather than external. It’s about developing the right character,
> the right state of mind,”
>
> I think i am a philosopher that is "smart", so i make you notice the logical
>
> And read my other thoughts of my philosophy here:
>
>
> Here is my answer:
>
> I think i am smart, and i will say that you have to know how to measure it,
>
>
> Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>

Look, realize first, that there is no such thing as
*google groups*, and to use *proper news reader*,
then we can talk about *being smart*...


-- 

7-77-777
Evil Sinner!
to weak you should be meek, and you should brainfuck stronger
https://github.com/rofl0r/chaos-pp

Back to comp.programming | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about can we trust the smartests in how they measure what is beauty and Love.. Branimir Maksimovic <branimir.maksimovic@icloud.com> - 2021-10-03 01:17 +0000

csiph-web